Driving the green: New study suggests that electric-powered trucks will save money for businesses

Feb 01, 2012 by Peter Dizikes
New MIT research suggests that electric delivery trucks, like this one, can help both the environment and the business bottom line. Photo courtesy of Staples

A company looking to purchase an electric-powered delivery truck today will likely experience some sticker shock: Such a vehicle costs nearly $150,000, compared to about $50,000 for the same kind of truck with a standard internal-combustion engine.

But before long — perhaps surprisingly — it’s a purchase that should pay for itself. That’s the conclusion of a new MIT study showing that are not just environmentally friendly, but also have the potential to improve the bottom line for many kinds of businesses.

The study, conducted by researchers at MIT’s Center for Transportation and Logistics (CTL), finds that electric vehicles can cost 9 to 12 percent less to operate than trucks powered by diesel engines, when used to make deliveries on an everyday basis in big cities.

“There has to be a good business case if there is going to be more adoption of electric vehicles,” says Jarrod Goentzel, director of the Renewable Energy Delivery Project at CTL and one of four co-authors of the new study. “We think it’s already a viable economic model, and as battery costs continue to drop, the case will only get better.”

Another of the paper’s co-authors, Clayton Siegert, a 2009 graduate of the CTL’s master’s of engineering in logistics program and a member of the Renewable Energy Delivery Project, presented the results in January at the IEEE Power and Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference, in Washington. The paper will be published in a volume of the conference’s proceedings. It originated in a thesis project by two researchers who received the master’s of engineering in logistics from CTL in 2011, Andre De Los Rios and Kristen Nordstrom.

Electric vehicles: A staple of the truck fleet?

The CTL study was conducted using data collected by the international office supplier Staples, as well as ISO New England, the nonprofit firm that runs New England’s electric power grid. Using that data, the researchers modeled the costs for a fleet of 250 delivery trucks, and examined alternate scenarios in which the whole fleet used one of three kinds of motors: purely electric engines, hybrid gas-electric engines and conventional diesel engines.

Based on the Staples data, the researchers modeled what would happen if the trucks in the fleet were driven 70 miles a day for 253 work days per year, with diesel gasoline costing $4 per gallon. Trucks with internal-combustion engines averaged 10.14 miles per gallon, compared to 11.56 miles per gallon for hybrid trucks, while the electric-only trucks averaged 0.8 kilowatt-hours per mile. Staples currently has 53 all-electric trucks, manufactured by Missouri-based Smith Electric Vehicles, in use in several American cities.

The study added one new component to the projections often made by industry fleet managers: The researchers looked at what would happen if the fleets of trucks were part of a vehicle-to-grid (V2G) system in which their batteries could be plugged into the electricity grid for 12 hours overnight, as an additional resource for providing reliable electricity to consumers. In such a setup, truck owners would be paid by utility firms for the power services they provide. V2G systems are currently being tested by multiple utility companies.

After running the numbers for various scenarios in which trucks are parked at slightly different times overnight, the MIT team found that businesses could earn roughly $900 to $1,400 per truck per year in V2G revenues in current energy markets, representing a reduction of 7 to 11 percent in vehicle operating costs. Firms would also save money on fuel, and on maintenance, because electric trucks induce less wear and tear on brakes.

All told, the operational cost per mile — the basic metric all fleet managers use — would drop from 75 cents per mile to 68 cents per mile when V2G-enabled electric trucks are substituted for internal-combustion trucks. Moreover, as Goentzel notes, “almost all these costs scale down to the individual vehicle.” Firms do not need fleets as big as 250 trucks to realize savings.

Michael Payette, director of fleet equipment at Staples, suggests that the MIT analysis corresponds with his firm’s results so far — although “it is still early in our post-deployment analysis,” he notes. In reviewing the performance of electric trucks, Payette adds, there have been “no real surprises from a reliability perspective, but I was surprised by the drivers’ acceptance, to the point where they do not ever want to drive a diesel [truck] again.”

In cities, ‘almost any truck you see is a candidate’

As Goentzel acknowledges, one limitation of the concept is that it only applies to urban truck fleets; electric vehicles do not have the range to make many kinds of rural or interstate deliveries. On the other hand, he notes, opportunities abound to use midsize electric trucks in cities.

“If you’re in an urban environment, almost any truck you see is a candidate,” Goentzel says. “If there’s a commercial truck in a city, it’s likely to be part of a fleet, whether it’s a service vehicle for a cable company, an electric utility truck, a mail package-delivery truck or part of a government fleet.”

And if the V2G concept is brought to market, commercial fleets would likely be among the first vehicles to be used, partly for logistical reasons: They would provide power resources that could be connected to the grid at regular times in the same locations.

“The initial opportunities for V2G are likely to be for fleets, because they can be managed and controlled,” Goentzel says. Knowing that, say, Staples would have 250 plugged into the grid at certain overnight hours would help utilities smooth out the flow of electricity to consumers. That delivery would be harder to manage, he notes, if it depended on individual consumers plugging their autos into the grid at more random times. “There is some work to be done before the average person is able to plug in their car and get paid by the grid,” Goentzel acknowledges.

Explore further: Researchers achieve 'holy grail' of battery design: A stable lithium anode

Related Stories

When fueling up means plugging in

May 18, 2011

Want a Nissan Leaf? Join the 20,000 people on the waiting list to get one. The Chevy Volt got your eye? General Motors ramped up availability earlier this year to try and meet demand. With the latest generation ...

Future Aussie trucking: silent and green

Nov 10, 2011

RMIT University researchers have developed Australia’s first hydrogen fuel cell truck, demonstrating how vehicle design and new sustainable technologies can make freight transport clean, green and silent.

Recommended for you

Turning bio-waste into hydrogen

12 hours ago

Whilst hydrogen cars look set to be the next big thing in an increasingly carbon footprint-aware society, sustainable methods to produce hydrogen are still in their early stages. The HYTIME project is working on a novel production ...

Economical and agile offshore construction ship

Jul 25, 2014

Siemens is currently installing the power supply and propulsion systems into a new multi-purpose offshore construction ship for Toisa Ltd. The ship, which is being built by the Korean company Hyundai Heavy ...

User comments : 10

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

antialias_physorg
4 / 5 (4) Feb 01, 2012
But they really need to do something about the noise of these vehicles (specifically the lack thereof). Walked in the park a few moths back shortly after the city gardening service had switched over to electric trucks. I was completely startled when I turned around and found that this huge truck had been following me the past 50 meters or so waiting for a spot where it could get past - in utter silence.

Just reminded me how often we rely on auditory clues to get out of the way (e.g. when a bicycle approaches from behind). A low hum or somesuch needs to be added (especially blind people would be at a huge disadvantage).
ccr5Delta32
5 / 5 (2) Feb 01, 2012
It would be quite easy to install some loudspeakers with some engine sounds linked to the accelerator pedal. Maybe a sub-woofer under the seat .
What I don't get is the price difference mention above 1000,000 $ . Must be a typo if not it suggest an immensely lucrative business opportunity
Eikka
3 / 5 (4) Feb 01, 2012
Did they really take in the cost of replacing the battery early due to the increased wear?

Because with batteries that cost $500 per kWh and last for 1000 cycles, you are looking at a cost of 50 cents per kWh used to the owner of the battery. Even halving the price in the next ten years would still make it 25 cents plus electricity on top. Selling a kWh of electricity is roughly the same as driving a mile more in terms of cost and maintenance to the car, since most of the price of an EV is in the battery.

There are batteries that last longer and cost less, but they're heavier and therefore unsuitable for delivery truck use because it cuts dramatically from the load carrying capacity of a truck to have three tons of batteries at the back.

That's the reason why automotive grade lithium batteries aren't used in grid storage. They're simply too expensive, and the owner would have to sell electricity at a dollar per kWh to offset all the costs and make a profit.

wealthychef
3 / 5 (4) Feb 01, 2012
This is an effort to confirm an existing bias, not an honest study. They threw in V2G, which is not even commonly available, and ignored the issue of maintenance and repair. V2G itself sounds very suspect to me.
Eikka
2.3 / 5 (3) Feb 01, 2012
Let's calculate: a 70 mile range in a truck that uses .8 kWh/mi needs 85 kWh of batteries. This is because the batteries will drop in capacity over their useful life, and they are considered dead at 2/3 capacity, which should be our 70 miles of range.

The average capacity over the life of the battery is 70.5 kWh, which multiplied by a thousand charge cycles gives us 70,500 kWh over the life of it.

At a cost of $500 per kWh to buy the battery new, that comes out as 60.3 cents per kWh to use it. Suppose you buy in electricity at 11 c/kWh - you'd have to sell it out at 71.3 cents plus taxes just to break even.

Who's gonna buy it, and when are they going to buy it? In the peak hour at noon when electricity prices skyrocket, and your car is not sitting at the garage but working?
Eikka
3 / 5 (4) Feb 01, 2012
V2G itself sounds very suspect to me.


It contradicts with practical reality.

You charge the truck at night when the electricity is cheap, and because it is cheap you can't sell it back at a profit at that time.

During the day when electricity is expensive, your truck is not being charged up in the garage, it's driving around the city delivering stuff, so you can't sell the electricity.
DrSki
1 / 5 (3) Feb 01, 2012
AND add in that the V2G payments are supposed to be a part of the savings (? already factored into the equations for operating costs per mile?) due to the favorable rates at night (non-peak hours in NYC likely NOT the 12-hours needed (cited above) to recharge - even less 'savings' will ultimately be appreciated. Some of the newer battery technologies still years off from commercial production.

Let's hope the exploding 'Volt' batteries aren't being used!!!
dschlink
1 / 5 (2) Feb 01, 2012
Eikka, that has always been the largely-ignored problem with V2G. The power peaks are also the prime travel times. Vehicles would need much larger batteries to have much surplus power available in the evenings when power demand is high. Afternoon peaks, due to A/C loads, occur when the vehicles are on the road.
antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (1) Feb 01, 2012
Actually the power supply in the afternoons is larger (especially solar puts in most in the afternoons).

Currently only large companies benefit from this (because the locally computed prices go down). Average consumers don't benefit from this, since most people are at work and they also have tarrifs that don't take usage patterns over the day into account (you only get charged by the watt-hours you use, not by WHEN you use those watt-hours - unlike companies do).
BuddyEbsen
not rated yet Mar 01, 2012
The average capacity over the life of the battery is 70.5 kWh, which multiplied by a thousand charge cycles


No fear of making up facts to suit your arguments, is there? Please provide a citation for your crappy 1000 charge cycle battery commonly in use in new electric vehicles.

The only number I can find for the Chevy Volt is 2500 charge cycles. Care to try your math again?