Wikipedia blocks 'disruptive' edits from US Congress

July 25, 2014
Wikipedia has blocked editing rights from some computers at the US House of Representatives in response to "disruptive" revisions of the online encyclopedia

Wikipedia has blocked editing rights from some computers at the US House of Representatives in response to "disruptive" revisions of the online encyclopedia.

A 10-day ban imposed Thursday blocked any editing from an IP address at the US Capitol, which is shared among a number of computers.

"You have been blocked from editing for a period of 10 days for persistent disruptive editing," a Wikipedia posting said.

The move came after unusual revisions were pointed out by Twitter account @congressedits, which describes itself as "a bot that tweets anonymous Wikipedia edits that are made from IP addresses in the US Congress."

The account was created by a software developer named Ed Summers.

Some of the changes, which were later undone, said that John F. Kennedy's assassin Lee Harvey Oswald acted "on behalf of Fidel Castro" and that the news blog Mediaite was "sexist" and "transphobic."

While Wikipedia allows users to contribute and edit entries, it also monitors for unverified or unsubstantiated comments.

A notice posted on one of the anonymous entries from Congress said: "Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia... Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed.

"Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism."

A spokeswoman at the Wikimedia Foundation, which operates Wikipedia, pointed out that the block only applies to a single IP address, not all computers located in Congress.

"The Wikipedia community is the arbiter of administrative decisions related to community editorial policies," spokeswoman Katherin Maher said in an email.

"In this case, the decision was made by a member of the English Wikipedia community, based on their assessment that the IP address in question was being used for disruptive editing. Wikipedia English has a behavioral guideline against disruptive editing."

Explore further: Wikipedia says it is losing contributors

Related Stories

Realtime map shows Wikipedia changes worldwide

May 14, 2013

( —The show of shows: A realtime map that you can watch, and watch, which displays where in the word people are editing articles for Wikipedia. We are almost tempted to issue a warning here that the map we are ...

Most Wikipedia health articles contain errors

May 28, 2014

(HealthDay)—Ninety percent of health articles on Wikipedia contain errors, according to a new study published in the May issue of the Journal of the American Osteopathic Association.

Recommended for you

Researchers find tweeting in cities lower than expected

February 20, 2018

Studying data from Twitter, University of Illinois researchers found that less people tweet per capita from larger cities than in smaller ones, indicating an unexpected trend that has implications in understanding urban pace ...

Augmented reality takes 3-D printing to next level

February 20, 2018

Cornell researchers are taking 3-D printing and 3-D modeling to a new level by using augmented reality (AR) to allow designers to design in physical space while a robotic arm rapidly prints the work.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

4.5 / 5 (2) Jul 25, 2014
Not going to name names?
Jul 25, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
5 / 5 (2) Jul 25, 2014
Not enough room here to do that. How many ill-informed and downright stupid politicians are there?

In the words of the internet, "over 9000"
1 / 5 (4) Jul 25, 2014
Surely y'all are familiar with the Million Monkey Theorem, here brought to life in the US Congress-critters with their millions of Crackberry keyboards. Their conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense; two agreeing is not consensus.
5 / 5 (3) Jul 25, 2014
Their conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense

Doug, don't talk about yourself like that.
5 / 5 (3) Jul 26, 2014
This single IP address, shared by a number of computers - in other words a bunch of machines NATted behind some sort of firewall. Could someone make a FOIA request to winnow out which machine (or machines) are the source?

Alll this activity should be in the open. Hard to imagine any good reason it should be kept secret from the electorate.
not rated yet Jul 26, 2014
this shows certain areas of government are desperate to control the past.
he who controls the past, controls the present.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.