This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:


trusted source


Top FIBers dashboard tracks superspreaders of low-credibility information online

Top FIBers dashboard tracks superspreaders of low-credibility information online
Top FIBers Dashboard. Credit: Indiana University

Social media superspreaders have the ability to rapidly disseminate information, regardless of its veracity. This means they can influence consequential conversations—for better or worse—related to elections, public health and social issues.

With the goal of tracking superspreaders that are disseminating large quantities of low-credibility content, Indiana University's Observatory on Social Media, or OSoMe, has launched a new tool: the Top FIBers dashboard.

This dashboard provides monthly reports highlighting the top 10 superspreaders of low-credibility information on social . Superspreaders are identified using a metric called the "False Information Broadcaster index" or "FIB index," which captures the consistency with which users share links to low-credibility sources that are subsequently reshared many times.

For example, a user with a FIB index of 100 has shared at least 100 posts linking to low-credibility sources, each of which has been reshared at least 100 times. On the other hand, a user who shares only one post linking to a low-credibility source will have a FIB index of one, even if it was reshared millions of times.

"Research from our observatory and others has shown that a few influencers are responsible for a large proportion of low-credibility content being shared online, including harmful content such as false vaccine claims," said Filippo Menczer, director of OSoMe and Luddy Distinguished Professor of Informatics and Computer Science. "Our new dashboard will help citizens understand the role of these bad actors in the spread of misinformation."

OSoMe uses a definition of misinformation commonly utilized in academic , which focuses on sources of information that mimic news media content in form but not in organizational process or intent. Using this definition, the dashboard searches for posts that contain at least one link to any source that meets three criteria: rated to have low credibility; categorized as either "conspiracy/pseudoscience" or "questionable/"; and labeled as having a low or very low factual score. These ratings are curated by an independent third party, Media Bias/Fact Check, and compiled by

Since a source's credibility rating can change, OSoMe updates its list of sources each month before releasing a new Top FIBers monthly report.

The dashboard uses publicly available data gathered from . Reports have been generated for all months beginning in January 2022 and will be updated each month moving forward.

"As the landscape evolves, OSoMe is constantly looking for new ways to partner with platforms on making data accessible to researchers," said Caitlin Watkins, OSoMe's executive director. "This tool exemplifies the public good that comes from such data access."

More information: Website:

Provided by Indiana University

Citation: Top FIBers dashboard tracks superspreaders of low-credibility information online (2023, May 25) retrieved 27 May 2023 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Political bias on social media emerges from users, not platform


Feedback to editors