Great white sharks and tuna share genetics that makes them super predators

Great white sharks and tuna share genetics that makes them super predators
Credit: Imperial College London

Despite evolving separately for 400 million years, some sharks and tuna share genetic traits linked to higher metabolism and quick swimming behaviour.

Tuna fish and the lamnid group of sharks, which includes , share some similar traits that help make them super predators, including their style of swimming and their ability to stay warm.

Despite their genetic separation, new research led by Imperial College London reveals many in the two groups that give them this predatory edge. The genes, linked to similar traits such as metabolism, have been preferentially selected for in both groups – meaning that they are more likely to be passed on since they give the creature a survival advantage.

The team also found one identical gene in both groups that is linked with metabolism, and the creatures' ability to produce energy. This finding could help scientists unravel the relationship between genetics and physical traits. The research is published this month in Genome Biology and Evolution.

Study co-author Professor Vincent Savolainen from the Department of Life Sciences at Imperial said: "Lamnid sharks and tuna both have stiff bodies and tails that allow them to swim in bursts. They can also keep their temperature up in colder waters. Both of these things make them more effective predators, allowing them to snatch prey in usually inhospitable waters.

"These are simple traits, and ones that have evolved twice. They give us a great point to start really examining the underlying genetics and understanding the relationship to physical traits."

Genes in the body code for different proteins, the building blocks of all tissues and functions in the body. When a gene is activated, and produces proteins, the process is called gene expression.

However, it is difficult to directly link a single gene to a , such as metabolism, because can be different in different organisms, causing the resulting trait to be different.

Looking at examples of the same gene used in two different animals can provide scientists with important clues as to how the expression of a gene relates to the physical trait observed.

Lamnid sharks and tuna fish both have very different lifestyles and bodies to other fish, but are remarkably similar to each other. This provides an ideal scenario for scientists to look for the convergence of genes and physical traits.

The team obtained samples of muscle tissue from three species of lamnid sharks and six species of tuna, as well as a closely related mackerel species, and looked at all the genes that were expressed.

While complex experiments are needed to know exactly what each gene does, the researchers could see genes that were associated with similar processes involving being preferentially selected in the sharks and tuna, but not the mackerel.


Explore further

New technique helps link complex mouse behaviors to the genes that influence them

More information: Adam G. Ciezarek et al. Substitutions in the glycogenin-1 gene are associated with the evolution of endothermy in sharks and tunas, Genome Biology and Evolution (2016). DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evw211
Citation: Great white sharks and tuna share genetics that makes them super predators (2016, September 23) retrieved 21 July 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2016-09-great-white-sharks-tuna-genetics.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
342 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Sep 23, 2016
some scientists continue to think that they have to try to connect all observations to a non-proven idea


A couple of points:
1. Evolution is both fact and theory. That allele frequency changes in breeding populations over time (definition of evolution) is a fact. All theories of evolution are models and attempts to explain the why of this observed fact, and they're not all mutually exclusive. Several of them may be correct at the same time; e.g. Selective Mating (one theory of evolution) can be ongoing while Natural Selection also occurs.

2. The two fish in the article, Sharks and Tuna, branched from a common ancestor 400 million years ago. That's why the statement was relevant to the article. Despite branching and going about their own separate changes over that time, they have retained similar traits.

Did your bedrock opinion that evolution can not be true flare up at the mention of the word and prevent you from seeing the point of the article?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more