New formula for high-strength shotcrete to protect tunnels from fires and terrorist attacks

Engineers at the Ruhr-Universität Bochum have developed a shotcrete that is much more robust than traditional concrete. It can render tunnels, bridges and other constructions more resistant against fires and explosions. The new formula includes 140 kilogrammes of steel fibres per cubic metre of concrete – a figure that was thought to be impossible for shotcrete. The science magazine RUBIN reports.

Air bubbles make high fibre percentage in concrete possible

The new concrete owes its high protective capacity to its high steel fibre volume, plus the three kilogrammes of synthetic fibres that are added to the mix. "It used to be said that approx. 70 kilogrammes of steel fibres per cubic metre of concrete is as good as it gets," says Götz Vollmann from the Institute for Tunnelling and Construction Management. Larger volumes would render the material too rigid to be pumped through a hose and sprayed via a nozzle. His team's trick: foaming up the concrete until the mixture contains approx. 20 percent air bubbles. "We assume that this process generates a ball-bearing effect of sorts," explains Vollmann. "The fibres presumably roll over the air bubbles, which makes everything smoother." The engineers add a defoamer to the concrete as it leaves the nozzle, which extracts air from the concrete within a fraction of a second.

New concrete can be applied to surfaces with complex geometries

Today, construction materials exist that can partially absorb the impact of explosions. Due to their manufacturing techniques, however, they almost exclusively take the form of slabs, which cannot be used for cladding surfaces with complex geometries. The shotcrete from Bochum, on the other hand, can be applied to surfaces of any shape. In controlled blast experiments, project partners from the Fraunhofer Association's Ernst-Mach-Institut in Freiburg demonstrated the capabilities of this protective concrete: It accounts for as much as 60 percent of the residual load capacity of the construction that has to be protected. By comparison, the residual load capacity of unprotected concrete in the same experimental setup reaches a mere 20 percent.

• 

• 

•