Chapman University research article wins 'Best of 2013' award

May 28, 2014, Chapman University
As the picture indicates, the quantum wave closely follows the classical particle on average. Credit: B. Thaller

The global scientific society Institute of Physics recently announced that their editors selected a research article by a team from Chapman University's Institute for Quantum Studies "for inclusion in the exclusive 'Highlights of 2013' collection." The paper, titled, "The classical limit of quantum optics: not what it seems at first sight," was originally published in the New Journal of Physics last year. This paper proposed a revolutionary new way to understand the relationship between the microscopic and macroscopic scales of nature – in other words the relationship between objects which are large enough to be visible with the naked eye vs. objects only "visible" using high-powered magnifying devices such as types of microscopes.

"The microscopic quantum realm of atoms and particles is so strange and different from the reality we experience at a human - or visible – scale, that it is almost impossible to picture the reality at the ," noted Jeff Tollaksen, Ph.D., one of the authors of the paper and co-director of Chapman's Institute for Quantum Studies.

"For example, individual particles at the quantum (or microscopic) scale can seem to hover in many different places at once. That is, many mutually exclusive possibilities seem to be simultaneously co-existent at the quantum scale. Even though everything around us at the macro or visible level is created out of these same atoms, nevertheless our experience of the macro level doesn't look anything like the quantum scale: i.e., we seem to always be in a definite location in spectacular contrast to the quantum reality," continued Dr. Tollaksen.

While scientists are still struggling to understand how all this "quantum weirdness" seems to disappear when bigger things are considered, the scientific community agrees that the transition from micro to macro occurs in a smooth way with no big surprises.

The Chapman team showed for the first time that this belief that the transition from microscopic to macroscopic scales is 'smooth' was dramatically not true. As a result, they argued that a complete revision of all intuitions and theories concerning this important relationship was required.

According to the paper: "Inventing a new of nature requires, as the [legendary] physicist Richard Feynman said, 'imagination in a terrible strait-jacket.' Unlike the artist, who need not obey constraints, scientists are not free to imagine whatever they want - the new theory must obey a 'correspondence principle'."

"It must, obviously, give different predictions than the old theory for some phenomena, but at the same time it must agree with the old theory in all the places in which the old theory was already experimentally verified. For all those experiments the new theory must give numerical results that are very similar to those of the old theory. Historically, the story told by the new theory relates in rather simple ways to the story of the old theory," the paper continues.

"Even the classical limit of quantum mechanics (seems to be) rather benign - with increasing mass, wavepackets [the localized field of waves surrounding a mass] become narrower and narrower yet they will take longer and longer to spread, so particles can be better localized. Wavepackets will then follow trajectories very close to the classical ones." the paper maintains.

The Chapman team showed, however, that this benign behavior is only an illusion: the classical limit of tells a conceptual story that is dramatically different from that of classical physics. The implications of this discovery are far reaching.

Explore further: Breakthrough paper on the Aharonov-Bohm effect published

Related Stories

Breakthrough paper on the Aharonov-Bohm effect published

May 14, 2014

Chapman University affiliated quantum physicist Yutaka Shikano, Ph.D., has published a milestone paper in the journal Nature Communications. The title of the article is "Aharonov-Bohm effect with quantum tunneling in linear ...

Recommended for you

Using organoids to understand how the brain wrinkles

February 20, 2018

A team of researchers working at the Weizmann Institute of Science has found that organoids can be used to better understand how the human brain wrinkles as it develops. In their paper published in the journal Nature Physics, ...

Pattern formation—the paradoxical role of turbulence

February 19, 2018

The formation of self-organizing molecular patterns in cells is a critical component of many biological processes. Researchers from Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet (LMU) in Munich have proposed a new theory to explain how ...

Bringing a hidden superconducting state to light

February 16, 2018

A team of scientists has detected a hidden state of electronic order in a layered material containing lanthanum, barium, copper, and oxygen (LBCO). When cooled to a certain temperature and with certain concentrations of barium, ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

May 28, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
not rated yet May 29, 2014
The one thing that is not considered here is that we're now talking about quantum systems being manipulable by consciousness--directed, and focused. Spooky action at a distance.

This is what has poured out of thousands of studies into such areas of phenomena. all of these I speak on, are well done studies and experiments in those areas, peer reviewed, all the way down the line. Meta studies, the whole works. no scientific possibility of error left unexplored.

What this side of the equation says, is that the idea that the quantum MUST fit the macro, the macro as known, is a FALSE premise.

The FULL evidence says: The macro is projected from the quantum and that the reflection of the macro via consciousness..... is the formation of the quantum INTO macro.

Therefore the so-called fundamental premise that any functional theory and associated numerical fit, must fit both, is FALSE.

The premise is a faulted trap of small circle logic.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.