Chandra adds to black hole birth announcement
Over three decades ago, Stephen Hawking placed -- and eventually lost - a bet against the existence of a black hole in Cygnus X-1. Today, astronomers are confident the Cygnus X-1 system contains a black hole. In fact, a team of scientists has combined data from radio, optical, and X-ray telescopes including Chandra to determine the black hole's spin, mass, and distance more precisely than ever before. With these key pieces of information, the history of the black hole has been reconstructed. This is an X-ray image of Cygnus X-1 from the Chandra X-ray Observatory. Credit: NASA/CXC
New details about the birth of a famous black hole that took place millions of years ago have been uncovered, thanks to a team of scientists who used data from NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory as well as from radio, optical and other X-ray telescopes.
Over three decades ago, Stephen Hawking placed -- and eventually lost a bet against the existence of a black hole in Cygnus X-1. Today, astronomers are confident the Cygnus X-1 system contains a black hole, and with these latest studies they have remarkably precise values of its mass, spin, and distance from Earth. With these key pieces of information, the history of the black hole has been reconstructed.
"This new information gives us strong clues about how the black hole was born, what it weighed and how fast it was spinning," said author Mark Reid of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA) in Cambridge, Mass. "This is exciting because not much is known about the birth of black holes."
Reid led one of three papers -- all appearing in the November 10th issue of The Astrophysical Journal -- describing these new results on Cygnus X-1. The other papers were led by Jerome Orosz from San Diego State University and Lijun Gou, also from CfA.
Cygnus X-1 is a so-called stellar-mass black hole, a class of black holes that comes from the collapse of a massive star. The black hole is in close orbit with a massive, blue companion star.
Cygnus X-1 is located near large active regions of star formation in the Milky Way. An artist's illustration depicts what astronomers think is happening within the Cygnus X-1 system. Cygnus X-1 is a so-called stellar-mass black hole, a class of black holes that comes from the collapse of a massive star. The black hole pulls material from a massive, blue companion star toward it. This material forms a disk (shown in red and orange) that rotates around the black hole before falling into it or being redirected away from the black hole in the form of powerful jets. Credit: NASA/CXC/M. Weiss
Using X-ray data from Chandra, the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer, and the Advanced Satellite for Cosmology and Astrophysics, a team of scientists was able to determine the spin of Cygnus X-1 with unprecedented accuracy, showing that the black hole is spinning at very close to its maximum rate. Its event horizon -- the point of no return for material falling towards a black hole -- is spinning around more than 800 times a second.An independent study that compared the evolutionary history of the companion star with theoretical models indicates that the black hole was born some 6 million years ago. In this relatively short time (in astronomical terms), the black hole could not have pulled in enough gas to ramp up its spin very much. The implication is that Cygnus X-1 was likely born spinning very quickly.
Using optical observations of the companion star and its motion around its unseen companion, the team made the most precise determination ever for the mass of Cygnus X-1, of 14.8 times the mass of the Sun. It was likely to have been almost this massive at birth, because of lack of time for it to grow appreciably.
"We now know that Cygnus X-1 is one of the most massive stellar black holes in the Galaxy," said Orosz. "And, it's spinning as fast as any black hole we've ever seen."
Knowledge of the mass, spin and charge gives a complete description of a black hole, according to the so-called "No Hair" theorem. This theory postulates that all other information aside from these parameters is lost for eternity behind the event horizon. The charge for an astronomical black hole is expected to be almost zero, so only the mass and spin are needed.
"It is amazing to me that we have a complete description of this asteroid-sized object that is thousands of light years away," said Gou. "This means astronomers have a more complete understanding of this black hole than any other in our Galaxy."
The team also announced that they have made the most accurate distance estimate yet of Cygnus X-1 using the National Radio Observatory's Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA). The new distance is about 6,070 light years from Earth. This accurate distance was a crucial ingredient for making the precise mass and spin determinations.
The radio observations also measured the motion of Cygnus X-1 through space, and this was combined with its measured velocity to give the three-dimensional velocity and position of the black hole.
This work showed that Cygnus X-1 is moving very slowly with respect to the Milky Way, implying it did not receive a large "kick" at birth. This supports an earlier conjecture that Cygnus X-1 was not born in a supernova, but instead may have resulted from the dark collapse of a progenitor star without an explosion. The progenitor of Cygnus X-1 was likely an extremely massive star, which initially had a mass greater than about 100 times the sun before losing it in a vigorous stellar wind.
In 1974, soon after Cygnus X-1 became a good candidate for a black hole, Stephen Hawking placed a bet with fellow astrophysicist Kip Thorne, a professor of theoretical physics at the California Institute of Technology, that Cygnus X-1 did not contain a black hole. This was treated as an insurance policy by Hawking, who had done a lot of work on black holes and general relativity.
By 1990, however, much more work on Cygnus X-1 had strengthened the evidence for it being a black hole. With the help of family, nurses, and friends, Hawking broke into Thorne's office, found the framed bet, and conceded.
"For forty years, Cygnus X-1 has been the iconic example of a black hole. However, despite Hawking's concession, I have never been completely convinced that it really does contain a black hole -- until now," said Thorne. "The data and modeling described in these three papers at last provide a completely definitive description of this binary system."
Provided by
Chandra X-ray Center
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
4 comments
-
Distance of planets from stars and revolution
4 hours ago
-
revamping general concept and cosmological principle
May 25, 2012
-
Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
May 25, 2012
-
Math behind Theoretical Physics
May 24, 2012
-
Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
May 23, 2012
-
Structure of the Milky Way?
May 20, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy
More news stories
Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study
(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.
1 hour ago |
not rated yet |
1
|
Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy
Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...
3 hours ago |
4 / 5 (1) |
10
|
10 million years needed to recover from mass extinction
It took some 10 million years for Earth to recover from the greatest mass extinction of all time, latest research has revealed.
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
3 hours ago |
not rated yet |
1
|
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (14) |
39
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Almost half of new vets seek disability
(AP) -- America's newest veterans are filing for disability benefits at a historic rate, claiming to be the most medically and mentally troubled generation of former troops the nation has ever seen.

Nov 17, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (21)
Give his money back!
Over three decades ago, repulsive forces between neutrons had not been noted in rest masses of all nuclei with two or more neutrons [1-4].
That prevents the collapse of massive neutron stars into black holes. Thus, Hawking guessed correctly and deserves his money back.
1. "Attraction and repulsion of nucleons: Sources of stellar energy," JFE 19, 93-98 (2001)
www.omatumr.com/abstracts/jfeinterbetnuc.pdf]www.omatumr.com/a...tnuc.pdf[/url]
2. "Neutron repulsion confirmed as energy source," JFE 20, 197-201 (2002)
www.springerlink....6685079/
3. "Is the Universe Expanding?" J. Cosmology 13, 4187-4190 (2011)
http://journalofc...102.html
4. "Neutron Repulsion", APEIRON J., in press (2011)
http://arxiv.org/...2.1499v1
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
www.omatumr.com/
Nov 17, 2011
Rank: 4.8 / 5 (19)
Could it be because the latter is *actually* a neutron star, and that Cygnus X1 is *clearly* a black hole?
You know what? Forget Cygnus X1. Let's talk about Sgr A*. I would just love to hear how a ~4,000,000 Solar Mass object that emits no light is anything other than a black hole. Dazzle me.
There's a difference between determination and obsession to the point of denial. Don't you understand that your behavior indicates that you are not well?
Nov 17, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (8)
Hey look, another wikipedia n00b who doesn't know any physics.
Nov 17, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
Well, apparently the astronomer quoted in this article secretly believes that hawking should get his money back too. hahaha.
By referring to it as an asteroid sized object, he is denying that it is a singularity. While functionally the same as a black hole, technically it would be a 'Dark Star' if Gou is correct.
At 14 Solar masses, the schwarzchild radius is definitely bigger than an asteroid. (it would be comparable to the radius of uranus)
Nov 17, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (8)
At 14.8 solar masses, I calculate a Schwarzschild radius of about 43.7 kilometers. Quite a bit shy of the radius of Uranus, but right on target for an asteroid.
Did you forget to make sure your units were in line? Maybe you solved for meters and misread it as kilometers?
Nov 17, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
ahhhh, you are correct. I retract my earlier statement.
On that note, 43 KM sounds a bit high. Did you actually run the calculations or just estimate it?
Nov 17, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
NM that last bit. Just rechecked my figures.
Nov 17, 2011
Rank: 3.9 / 5 (7)
http://www.homefa...uel.html
http://mominer.ms...hildren/
Nov 18, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Did you bother to do the calculation? At 14.8 Stellar masses it appears to me to have a radius of about 43 km. Definitely not the size of Uranus and well within the size of an asteroid. Please show your work. I used the proportionality constant of 2.95 km/stellar mass. What did you use?
Nov 18, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Wow, I wonder if that is really him, or a coinicidence/prank.
It would explain alot, but is a pretty sad joke otherwise...
Nov 18, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
I agree with this statement. It is really on spot. I do not have the education in this astronomy area as many of you do, but in my personal art, and profession of my life, I have learned that life is the most important thing in life. That it is actually a most important self-evident truth. No one can discuss anything without life and anything said that does not hold life as most important is a fantastic comment that is; obsession. It seems most, if not all, are sick. We need some cures and the discoveries that are being poured out are pouring from life itself. Much respect.
Nov 18, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Did you bother checking the other comments? We already went down this road. I mistook my meters for kilometers. The retraction was already made.
Nov 18, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Nov 19, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
http://www.mshp.d...leName=K
Nov 19, 2011
Rank: 4.4 / 5 (7)
Galaxies could not form.
Stars would be impossible. Even more so if they have a neutron core and a RIGID or even non-rigid iron mantle. Which is a model despite your claims of not making models.
Planets would be impossible.
Asteroids would be impossible, including the ones you studied and particularly the iron meteors.
All that put together makes you impossible as well.
Self contradiction is not a good sign in a theory even if you keep ignoring it. The rest of us can see it.
Running from the question is just evidence that you have no answer.
Ethelred
Nov 19, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (8)
Nov 22, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
gladly, when oliver stops spouting nonsense and submits an actual paper backed up with math and that also addresses all the other gaping holes in his neutron repulsion theory and a pulsar inside the sun.
Nov 22, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Bravo.