Examining the 'forgetfulness' of state-of-the-art climate models in equatorial and coastal regions

Examining the 'forgetfulness' of state-of-the-art climate models in equatorial and coastal regions
Latitudinal distribution of α for the LSAT of CRUTEM5 and 60 CMIP6 models. The change in the latitudinal range of the grids in the figure is consistent with that in the CRUTEM5 dataset, and the α value for each grid is the average α at this latitude. Credit: Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters (2022). DOI: 10.1016/j.aosl.2022.100291

General circulation models play an important role in researching and predicting climate change, and so assessing their performance as they are developed and refined is hugely important.

Climate "memory" is a well-known concept in . It refers to the effects of slowly responding subsystems (e.g., the ocean) to the state of the climate in the future. Long-term memory characteristics in air temperature series are widely used to evaluate model performance.

However, the most recent, state-of-the-art models, i.e., those included in the latest phase (phase 6) of the Coupled Model Intercomparison—an to improve by comparing their outputs with observations—have yet to be comprehensively evaluated in this way.

To help address this knowledge gap, the in the land surface air temperature series of 60 such models was evaluated by the group of Dr. Fenghua Xie from the China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China, with an observational dataset as the reference. Their findings have recently been published in Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters.

At the global scale, it was found that the models can successfully reproduce the long-term memory characteristics in temperature series, with 38 models performing well in simulating the long-term memory of the global-mean temperature. It terms of latitudinal distribution, the long-term memory is strongest near the equator, and the Southern Hemisphere shows a stronger memory than the Northern Hemisphere.

This variation with latitude was reflected in all 60 models, but two models in particular (the latest models from France's Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques and the UK Met Office's Hadley Centre) performed the best.

At the regional scale, significant differences were found in the equatorial and , either when comparing the observations with each individual model or the ensemble mean of all 60. Further analysis revealed that these biases may be rooted in the imperfect simulation by the models of the coupled processes between the oceans and atmosphere, such as Max Planck Institut's model had a period of less than 8 years while it could not be found in the observation.

"The phenomenon of long-term memory in temperature series is of great significance to climatic prediction and the study of ," says the corresponding author of the study, Dr. Xie. "Therefore, the simulation biases related to long-term memory may be one of the sources of uncertainty in regional climate change."

More information: Linzhi Li et al, On the long-term memory characteristic in land surface air temperatures: How well do CMIP6 models perform?, Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters (2022). DOI: 10.1016/j.aosl.2022.100291

Citation: Examining the 'forgetfulness' of state-of-the-art climate models in equatorial and coastal regions (2022, November 9) retrieved 8 February 2023 from https://phys.org/news/2022-11-state-of-the-art-climate-equatorial-coastal-regions.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Model comparison adds more value in simulating extreme temperatures in China

19 shares

Feedback to editors