Unexpected interaction between ocean currents and bacteria

Unexpected interaction between ocean currents and bacteria
Purple area: This ocean water holds less than 10 percent oxygen. Blue area: The Oxygen Free Zone off Peru/Chile, where bacteria produce huge amount of nitrogen. Black Arrow: Ocean current that transports the bacteria through the Oxygen Minimum Zone. Credit: Bo Thamdrup/SDU

For the first time, researchers have successfully demonstrated an interaction between ocean currents and bacteria: The unexpected interaction leads to the production of vast amounts of nitrogen gas in the Pacific Ocean. This takes place in one of the largest oxygen free water masses in the world - and these zones are expanding. This can ultimately weaken the ocean's ability to absorb CO2.

Three places in the world harbor extensive oxygen free , called Oxygen Minimum Zones. In these zones, microbes produce atmospheric - the gas that accounts for almost 80 per cent of Earth's atmosphere. Researchers from the University of Southern Denmark now report to have found the reason behind the huge nitrogen gas production in the largest of the three Minimum Oxygen Zones, located in the Pacific Ocean off Chile and Peru. The nitrogen gas is produced by a steady stream of who, when they feed, produce lots of nitrogen gas.

"The bacteria flow with an ocean current, that comes from the Equator and is heading towards the South Pole. On their way south the bacteria rid the water of ammonia, which they eat and transform into nitrogen gas in the Oxygen Minimum Zone", explain the scientists, postdoc Loreto De Brabandere and Professor Bo Thamdrup from the Nordic Center for Earth Evolution at the University of Southern Denmark.

Behind the research are also colleagues from Aarhus University, Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, USA, and Universidad de Concepción, Chile.

In the western Pacific off New Zealand heavy and nutrient-rich water sinks below the surface and begins to flow as an underwater current; first towards and along the Equator and then it changes course and heads south, when it approaches the coast of South America. During this long journey oxygen disappears from the current's water, and off Peru and Chile the hungry bacteria go to work.

The hungry bacteria in the ocean current from the Equator are called anammox bacteria; they get energy to grow by allowing nitrite to react with ammonia and form nitrogen gas. Anammox bacteria and their impact on the global nitrogen cycle were only discovered a few years ago.

The scientists are surprised, that this type of bacteria is responsible for the production of nitrogen gas in the giant Oxygen Minimum Zone in the Pacific Ocean.

"In the other zones we find that another nitrogen gas producing type of bacteria is responsible, namely the so-called denitrifying bacteria," says Loreto De Brabandere.

Denitrifying bacteria also produce nitrogen gas, but they do it from nitrate and nitrite when combusting organic material - not from ammonia as anammox bacteria do.

"But here we show that the denitrifying bacteria simply do not get enough organic food to form nitrogen gas, so they are virtually pushed out of the way by anammox bacteria that come with the water from the Equator. The result is that anammox bacteria account for almost the entire nitrogen gas production", explains Bo Thamdrup.

If the anammox bacteria did not come with ocean currents along the coast of South America, significantly less nitrogen gas would be produced in the oceans as a whole. The denitrifying bacteria would probably never be able to find enough nutrients to produce the same amount of nitrogen gas.

"The exciting news is that the explanation for the large production of nitrogen gas off Chile is found near the Equator, over a thousand kilometers further north. It is the first time we see such an interaction between , bacteria, and nutrient cycling", says Bo Thamdrup.

There are no indications that the ocean current may be disturbed by climate change or other factors, and thus there will probably be no changes in its cargo of anammox bacteria.

"However there are signs that the Oxygen Minimum Zones around the world are expanding, and this can lead to an increased production of . An increase in nitrogen gas emission leads to fewer algae in the water, and thus there is less food for marine microorganisms. Ultimately, it means less food for the fish", explains Bo Thamdrup.

Expanding Minimum Oxygen Zones may also weaken the ocean's capacity to absorb CO2, explains Loreto De Brabandere:

"It gives more room for the nitrate-eating bacteria, and thus there is less nitrate available to marine plankton. Plankton is effective at absorbing CO2, and if there is less plankton there will be less CO2 absorbed".

Explore further

Strangers invade the homes of giant bacteria

More information: Environmental Microbiology, vol 15, issue 9.
Journal information: Environmental Microbiology

Citation: Unexpected interaction between ocean currents and bacteria (2013, September 13) retrieved 16 July 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2013-09-unexpected-interaction-ocean-currents-bacteria.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Sep 14, 2013
"An increase in nitrogen gas emission leads to fewer algae in the water, and thus there is less food for marine microorganisms. Ultimately, it means less food for the fish."

Is carbon dioxide causing algae to die off or thrive? Any school kid knows!

James Hansen has finally spilled the beans in his parting publication as a NASA scientist:

"We suggest that the surge of fossil fuel use, mainly coal, since 2000 is a basic cause of the large increase of carbon uptake by the combined terrestrial and ocean carbon sinks. One mechanism by which fossil fuel emissions increase carbon uptake is by fertilizing the biosphere via provision of nutrients essential for tissue building, especially nitrogen, which plays a critical role in controlling net primary productivity and is limited in many ecosystems and field studies confirm a major role of nitrogen deposition, working in concert with CO2 fertilization, in causing a large increase in net primary productivity of temperate and boreal forests."

Sep 14, 2013

James Hansen said something that you seem to consider a premise proving a conclusion. You do however not tell us what the conclusion is.

Just to explain a bit this "beans-spilling" piece that you find so interesting: This man is saying that more CO2 thrives algae / plankton growth... I guess that this may be the key to this misterious conclusion of yours that you seem to think is so obvious that we all should know.

But, this statement is a premise to conclusion by Mr Hansen that we don't know. And there are more premises: Algae when dying absorb more O2 and emit methane gas (a classic example of eutrophication) and the carbon sinks have a limited capability.

Last an not least Mr Hansen wasn't aware of THIS study which gets the N depositions back into circulation.

In order to be able to judge by ourselves it would be quite cool if you include a link to your fabulous "Bean Spilling", KTHXBYE

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more