Mass limits of dark matter derived from 'strange' stars
October 12, 2010 By Lisa Zyga
A simulated dark matter halo. Physicists have put a new limit on WIMP mass by investigating how WIMPs can convert neutron stars into strange stars. Image credit: Wikimedia Commons.
(PhysOrg.com) -- Much of the matter in our universe may be made of a type of dark matter called weakly interacting massive particles, better known as WIMPs. Although some scientists predict that these hypothetical particles possess many of the necessary properties to account for dark matter, so far scientists have not been able to make any definite predictions of their mass. Now, in a new study, physicists have derived a limit on the WIMP mass by calculating how these dark matter particles can transform neutron stars into stars made of strange quark matter, or "strange" stars.
The physicists, Dr. M. Angeles Perez-Garcia from the University of Salamanca in Salamanca, Spain, along with Dr. Joseph Silk of the University of Oxford and Dr. Jirina R. Stone of the University of Oxford and the University of Tennessee, have published their study in a recent issue of Physical Review Letters.
We have proposed a mechanism to put an additional constraint on the WIMP mass based on the possibility of WIMP self-annihilation as a procedure to create strangelets in the interior of neutron stars, which could trigger a transition to a quark star, Perez-Garcia told PhysOrg.com. WIMP mass is an important quantity to know since WIMPS are considered to be constituents of dark matter. Dark matter is presently thought to form most of the matter in the universe. By knowing this value, we would be able to put another piece of fundamental information on our current knowledge of the building blocks of our universe and after that see, for example, how dark matter interacts with regular matter, how it is distributed spatially, etc.
As dark matter particles, WIMPs are thought to be largely located in the halos of galaxies. Although galaxy halos are not visible, they contain most of a galaxy's mass in the form of the heavy WIMPs. In their study, the scientists focused on what happens when WIMPs from galactic halos are captured by neutron stars located deeper within the galaxy.
Neutron stars are known for their extreme density: although a typical neutron star has a radius of only 10 km, it has more mass than our Sun. Theories predict that neutron stars and black holes are gravitational accretors of dark matter. Some models even discuss that WIMPs could have formed the first stars in our universe, known as dark stars, powered by dark matter annihilation instead of nuclear fusion.
In their study, the scientists theoretically showed that, when a neutron star gravitationally captures nearby WIMPs, the WIMPs may trigger the conversion of the neutron star into a strange star. The conversion occurs as a result of the WIMPs seeding the neutron stars with long-lived lumps of strange quark matter, or strangelets. When WIMPs are captured in the neutron star's core, they self-annihilate, releasing energy in the process. The exact energy released depends on the properties of the WIMPs, such as the WIMPs' mass. At certain energy levels, the energy will partly convert into heat that causes thermal fluctuations, which in turn can burn the star's nucleons into quark bubbles that eventually become strangelets.
Some of these strangelets decay rapidly and have no effect on the neutron star. But if the strangelets have a high enough baryon number, they can live up to several days. Previous research has shown that it takes about 100 seconds to convert a neutron star into a strange star, a process that could potentially be triggered by long-lived strangelets.
By figuring out the minimum required baryon number and efficiency rate for a strangelet to trigger the conversion of a neutron star into a strange star, the scientists could calculate the parent WIMP mass as a function of this baryon number. In this relationship, the more massive the WIMPs are, the higher the conversion rate from neutron star to strange star.
As the scientists note, the predicted WIMP mass limits can be investigated with current observational and experimental searches. For example, observing a strange star and measuring simultaneously its mass and radius could provide more constraints on strangelets' properties. There are currently two NASA missions in preparation that have the objective to provide this information with much improved precision than currently available data. The Space Interferometry Mission (SIM Lite), which is under development, will accurately determine distances and directly map orbits of X-ray binaries. The NASA ESA JAXA IXO (International X-ray Observatory), which has a planned launch in 2021, will determine the radius and mass of several neutron stars to within several percent, providing a strong constraint on their composition. Also, terrestrial experiments at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) may be able to identify the formation of strangelets and further investigate their properties.
Strangelets have been searched for so far in experiments like E864 and E896 at BNL in the US and NA52 at CERN, said Perez-Garcia. Currently, they are being searched for at RHIC in BNL and LHC at CERN. Their observation is difficult since we do not yet know their electrical charge nor their lifetime before they decay into other products. The proof for observation would be a large point-like signal in the zero-degree calorimeter (due to the large charge of these objects, they travel mostly straight when produced); there are some computational simulations of how this would look like.
The strange stars have not been observed so far, and very useful information would be provided by current missions on X-ray satellites that measure luminosity of these objects (mostly in binary systems) to deduce mass and radius. In this way, we could have information of its interior composition through measuring an unusual small value of the radius of this star with a mass slightly bigger that one solar mass.
Perez-Garcia, Silk, and Stone also predict that the neutron star conversion process could generate detectable gamma-ray bursts. In the future, the physicists hope to investigate whether WIMP annihilation inside neutron stars has other observable consequences, such as altering its temperature and rotation patterns.
More information: M. Angeles Perez-Garcia, Joseph Silk, and Jirina R. Stone. Dark Matter, Neutron Stars, and Strange Quark Matter. Physical Review Letters 105, 141101 (2010). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.141101
Copyright 2010 PhysOrg.com.
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or part without the express written permission of PhysOrg.com.
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
28 comments
-
Every black hole contains a new universe: A physicist presents a solution to present-day cosmic mysteries,
214 comments
-
New silicon memory chip developed,
16 comments
-
Computing experts unveil superefficient 'inexact' chip,
45 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
41 comments
-
Paradox of motion implies discrete space?
1 hour ago
-
acceleration decceleration
3 hours ago
-
Spiral motion and the centripetal force
3 hours ago
-
Uniform Circular Motion
4 hours ago
-
freely accesible translations
5 hours ago
-
Potential difference and terminal potential difference
6 hours ago
- More from Physics Forums - General Physics
More news stories
Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?
(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...
Thousands of invisibility cloaks trap a rainbow
Many people anticipating the creation of an invisibility cloak might be surprised to learn that a group of American researchers has created 25 000 individual cloaks.
2 hours ago |
5 / 5 (2) |
0
|
Slip-and-slide power generators
Researchers from Vestfold University College in Norway have created a simple, efficient energy harvesting device that uses the motion of a single droplet to generate electrical power.
3 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
Excitons: Exotic particles, chilled and trapped, form giant matter wave
Physicists have trapped and cooled exotic particles called excitons so effectively that they condensed and cohered to form a giant matter wave.
9 hours ago |
5 / 5 (3) |
1
|
Sound increases the efficiency of boiling
Scientists at the Georgia Institute of Technology achieved a 17-percent increase in boiling efficiency by using an acoustic field to enhance heat transfer. The acoustic field does this by efficiently removing vapor bubbles ...
4 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
HyperSolar shows dirty water no barrier to power world
(Phys.org) -- The Santa Barbara, California, company, HyperSolar, is set to transparently share the ups and downs of its research experiences toward the companys ultimate vision, successfully producing ...
Asteroid nudged by sunlight: Most precise measurement of Yarkovsky effect
Scientists on NASA's asteroid sample return mission, Origins, Spectral Interpretation, Resource Identification, Security, Regolith Explorer (OSIRIS-REx), have measured the orbit of their destination asteroid, ...
Organic carbon from Mars, but not biological
Molecules containing large chains of carbon and hydrogen--the building blocks of all life on Earth--have been the targets of missions to Mars from Viking to the present day. While these molecules have previously ...
In nanorod crystal growth, nanoparticles seen as artificial atoms
In the growth of crystals, do nanoparticles act as "artificial atoms" forming molecular-type building blocks that can assemble into complex structures? This is the contention of a major but controversial theory ...
New mapping of Mars shows western Medusae Fossae formation older than once thought
(Phys.org) -- Recent geologic mapping of the Medusae Fossae Formation on Marsan intensely eroded deposit near the northern edge of the cratered highlandshas revealed a wider distribution of its ...
First direct observation of oriented attachment in nanocrystal growth
Berkeley Lab researchers have reported the first direct observation of nanoparticles undergoing oriented attachment, the critical step in biomineralization and the growth of nanocrystals. A better understanding ...
Oct 12, 2010
Rank: 1.4 / 5 (17)
Oct 12, 2010
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (16)
Oct 12, 2010
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (16)
Oct 12, 2010
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (18)
Oct 12, 2010
Rank: 4.9 / 5 (9)
Oct 12, 2010
Rank: 4.8 / 5 (5)
"SQM stars around pulsar PSR B1257+12"
http://arxiv.org/...56v1.pdf
Oct 12, 2010
Rank: 2.5 / 5 (2)
Does anyone know what i am referring to? And is that what the article is referencing without directly stating?
Oct 12, 2010
Rank: 2.7 / 5 (3)
Oct 12, 2010
Rank: 2.5 / 5 (2)
Yes but that raises an even bigger question.
Would we even be able to view a strange quark star orbiting another strange quark star through luminosity dips as we can with this pulsar system?
Oct 12, 2010
Rank: 2.5 / 5 (2)
Oct 12, 2010
Rank: 4.8 / 5 (4)
I'm not sure if I understand your question, but the known 'bodies' in orbit around the millisecond pulsar in this system were discovered by anomalies they induced in the pulsar's spin rate, not by transits or eclipses of the neutron star. But if two massive objects (quark stars or neutron stars) were found in an eclipsing binary system, I could indeed imagine some wild lightcurves generated as each component took turns 'lensing' its companion! I'm sure astronomers would love to stumble upon such a system for the opportunities it would provide in testing gravitational theories.
Oct 12, 2010
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (4)
Oct 12, 2010
Rank: 2.5 / 5 (2)
Through what mechanic would a strange star generate electromagnetic emission to be seen? That's the issue. Strangeletes wouldn't be subject to the strong and weak nuclear forces in the same manner in which known stars are. They would introduce an electromagnetic trap, not an electromagnetic generator like visible matter.
Effectively, if they were strange stars, they'd be entirely dark.
Oct 12, 2010
Rank: 2.9 / 5 (7)
If you give me a grant of 10 million dollars I will search pacific islands for pigs, if I find any it will one step closer to proving that pigs can fly.
Oct 12, 2010
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (4)
If a neutron star converts to a strange star there will be a large amount of energy released in that 100 seconds. This should appear as some sort of gamma ray flash. But at only one event per neutron star it may be very rare to actually observe.
Oct 12, 2010
Rank: 2.2 / 5 (6)
(and no, this is not meant as a response to jsa09's comment above.. sadly)
And now a bit off-topic:
There is nothing "strange" existing or happening in the Universe. Calling something "strange" is only a manifestation of deficiency in understanding rather than a description of its properties. Whoever comes up with these fancy names for all the superficious hypothetical constructs should be shot, as it only serves as perfect fuel for misguided thought in the minds of those who actually hardly ever have a clue..
Strange matter, Dark (as in "evil") matter, "Big-Bang" machine, Strange-let, "GOD" particle.. Awww, c'mon..
PS: jsa09, I would be rather cautious about the flyin' pigs, as it actually could happen one day ^^ On the other hand, a giant galaxy-eating potato, now that would be a much more appropriate candidate :)
Peace :)
Oct 12, 2010
Rank: 4.8 / 5 (5)
"Through what mechanic would a strange star generate electromagnetic emission to be seen?"
Similar to neutron stars, strange stars are thought to have a hot tenuous 'atmosphere' or corona that radiates as a blackbody with a peak in the x-ray regime(Teff=10^6K after 1-2Mys cooling). Astronomers are now focusing on how to tell the two apart (mainly through x ray spectroscopy) and many models are proposed. Also, quark stars are thought to be rapidly rotating & have strong magnetic fields, resulting in quark pulsar emissions in x ray through radio. A quark star in a binary star system should still radiate through an accretion disk, in addition.
There are also several proposed types of quark stars: http://en.wikiped...rmations
@Graeme,
"But at only one event per neutron star it may be very rare to actually observe."
I've seen some models that propose two gamma ray flashes, but as you note, these are brief, singular events.
Oct 12, 2010
Rank: 4.4 / 5 (5)
But such is the way of science. I agree such names can generate much confusion among the public, but of course these terms are used as shorthand between researchers in their respective fields (save for a few like 'God Particle', ugh). But think of it this way, you can tell your friends and relatives that you study Winos, MACHOs and Wimps and keep a straight face. :^)
Oct 12, 2010
Rank: 1.1 / 5 (14)
Oct 12, 2010
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (6)
Anyway, this seems to shine one heck of a negative light on CERN's LSAG safety analysis...
Oct 13, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (14)
Oct 13, 2010
Rank: 1.1 / 5 (14)
Oct 13, 2010
Rank: 4 / 5 (3)
For example why does dark matter apply to large scale structures (galaxies) but does not seem to effect smaller structures? What are the properties of DM that explain the scale behavior?
How could a dark star exist if dark matter can't interact with itself. Sure there is a lot of gravity but wouldn't that be canceled by each dark matter particles kinetic energy since there would be no friction to allow clumping as with normal matter?
Oct 13, 2010
Rank: 4 / 5 (2)
I don't think so. Strangelets are just clumps of baryonic matter made from strange nucleons. As such they would be subject to both the strong and electroweak forces... i.e. they should reflect and emit just like regular matter.
Oct 13, 2010
Rank: 2.5 / 5 (4)
Oct 13, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (7)
If one needs to identify and search for a feasible solution- Raise the Vision Index- East-West Cosmology interaction is at your door. Why do you shun away !!
http://www.scribd...rse-2003
Vidyardhi Nanduri
Oct 13, 2010
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (7)
Oct 13, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (3)
yyz, Yes but neutron stars aren't converting their accretion disks. Strange stars would be.
Oct 13, 2010
Rank: 4.8 / 5 (5)
"Yes but neutron stars aren't converting their accretion disks. Strange stars would be."
Well, not having a deep knowledge of accretion disks around all types of proposed quark stars, I'd be willing to cede that point. LOL.(I'd note that the term quark star can refer to an object totally made up of strange matter or to an object with a strange matter core and a neutronium mantle.)
But to your original query, quark stars should be visible over a wide range of wavelengths. The sticking point is how to tell a quark star from a neutron star. My previous link describes several quark star candidates (with links to published papers). The papers go into some detail about possible discriminators between the two objects. But looking at the sheer complexities involved, any discoveries of these objects may be years away, if at all. Who knows, maybe some finding from the LHC will provide astronomers with a vital clue in the hunt for quark stars.
Oct 14, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (7)
['My' in-seven-days] ... eclec image pion (Mars) core pi 2 ...
Oct 14, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Editors. Ugg.
Oct 17, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
If black holes have been consuming WIMPS for 13 billion years and Neutron stars have been converting WIMPS also for 13 billion years that WIMPS would be in a similar state to oil reserves, i.e. somewhat depleted.
Surely that would question the ability of WIMPS to still comprise about 80% of the visible universes matter???
Oct 17, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
You seem to neglect that black holes have been eating matter for 13 billion years as well.
So yes the universe has been depleted of both WIMPS and normal matter therefore the ratio may not be that much different from when it started.
What does indicate is that black holes may contain 80% of the mass of the universe and there may not be any WIMPS.
Oct 18, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Oct 19, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (5)
It might be much better to check out a bounded universe with a center as a model and all this unwarranted expensive research [we're talking billions of dollars here] into dark matter and dark energy goes away.
But of course the scientists have vested interests now so no one will listen.
Oct 19, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Example: imagine if you had two beach balls, one was 1 foot away, the other was 2 feet away. Every hour your initial measurement of space between you and the beach balls increases at a rate of 1 inch per foot. In one hour the beachball that was one foot away is not 1 foot 1 inch away, while the beachball that was two feet away is now two feet 2 inches away.
Oct 19, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
So this appears that the further beachball is moving away more rapidly, when both are actually moving at the same rate of acceleration. To address your second point:Well here's the problem. If you have a center then you entirely change the dynamic. It's like using Ptolemy's model of the solar system as opposed to Keppler's. You'd have to introduce a different variable for every piece of matter in the Universe to match observations. Which means far away from us would be galaxies that are moving so fast they should shred themselves. In effect you'd be asking for to the power of 50 as each and every galaxy would have a different set of variables governing everything, including gravity, within them. Effectively you'd toss all the laws of motion in the garbage.
Oct 22, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (9)
Oct 22, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (9)
In this work the increased concentration of strange stars formation could indicate the approaching phase transition of vacuum, known as a space-rip.
http://arxiv.org/.../9807052