NASA chief acknowledges more trouble with SLS rocket

March 14, 2019 by Ivan Couronne
In this photo obtained from NASA, technicians at NASA's Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans move the largest piece of structural test hardware for the new deep space rocket, the Space Launch System (SLS)

The US space agency NASA on Wednesday cast a shadow on the future of its new heavy-lift rocket, the SLS—acknowledging development delays on a project that is already years behind.

The Space Launch System program is being run much as the Apollo and space shuttle mission were handled in the days of old.

But Wednesday's announcement illustrates how quickly NASA has embraced a new era dominated by private space companies who are offering the option of low-cost transport on a mission-by-mission basis.

"SLS is struggling to meet its schedule" and won't be ready in time for a first unmanned mission around the Moon and back, dubbed EM-1, set for June 2020, NASA administrator Jim Bridenstine told lawmakers.

"Last week, it came to our attention that we're not going to be able to maintain the schedule," which is already three years behind, he told the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee.

Boeing has spent years developing the SLS, which would be the most powerful rocket ever built, with the goal of resuming manned space missions to the Moon. The project has already cost $12 billion.

A capsule for astronauts, Orion, is being built by Lockheed-Martin and Europe for the missions.

Wednesday marked the first time that NASA has clearly acknowledged the extent of the problems with the SLS.

This file artist concept image from NASA shows the next generation of heavy-lift rocket, the Space Launch System—which has once again been delayed

That news did not surprise industry analysts, who have signaled problems with the development of the SLS for years.

Boeing is using more than 1,000 subcontractors in 43 US states to get the job done. That translates to thousands and thousands of jobs.

Congress initially wanted a first flight in late 2016. NASA then pushed back the date little by little.

But Bridenstine then made the shocking announcement that he wants to entrust the EM-1 mission to existing private launch systems, instead of waiting for SLS to be ready.

"We have amazing capability that exists right now that we can use off the shelf in order to accomplish this objective," he said.

He did not specify which private company he had in mind, but SpaceX—founded by billionaire Elon Musk—would be a natural candidate with its Falcon Heavy rocket.

The Delta IV Heavy of United Launch Alliance—a joint venture of Lockheed and Boeing—also would be a capable alternative.

NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine made the surprise announcements about the SLS program before the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee
Congress will have to decide

The new plan would consist of launching the Orion capsule, and then following it up with the launch of an upper stage for propulsion.

The two elements would then dock in orbit for the voyage around the Moon.

No rocket in existence today is capable of lifting both elements together, because of their weight, which is why NASA had said it needed the more powerful SLS.

"I want to be clear, we do not have right now an ability to dock the Orion crew capsule with anything in orbit. So between now and June of 2020, we would have to make that a reality," Bridenstine said.

One skeptical senator reminded him: "This is 2019...."

Bridenstine replied: "NASA has a history of not meeting launch dates, and I'm trying to change that."

A 1:50 scale model of NASA's Space Launch System (SLS) is displayed at the agency's booth during the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas on January 11, 2018

The administration of President Donald Trump has made it clear that it is unhappy with all the delays.

In its budget proposal unveiled on Monday, the government wants to let the private sector launch the components of the mini-space station, dubbed the Gateway, that NASA wants to put in orbit around the Moon in the 2020s.

It also decided that private companies would launch a probe towards Jupiter's moon Europa.

Both of those missions were initially expected to be carried out using the SLS.

In the end, Congress will have to decide whether to pass the space budget as is or request changes that would preserve the SLS program's place in upcoming missions.

Producing the SLS in 43 states means 86 senators have something to lose if the SLS program goes south, leading some snarky commentators to label it the "Senate Launch System."

The budget for 2020 should be adopted in the coming months.

Explore further: NASA's new rocket won't be ready for moon shot next year

Related Stories

Recommended for you

A decade on, smartphone-like software finally heads to space

March 20, 2019

Once a traditional satellite is launched into space, its physical hardware and computer software stay mostly immutable for the rest of its existence as it orbits the Earth, even as the technology it serves on the ground continues ...

Tiny 'water bears' can teach us about survival

March 20, 2019

Earth's ultimate survivors can weather extreme heat, cold, radiation and even the vacuum of space. Now the U.S. military hopes these tiny critters called tardigrades can teach us about true toughness.

Researchers find hidden proteins in bacteria

March 20, 2019

Scientists at the University of Illinois at Chicago have developed a way to identify the beginning of every gene—known as a translation start site or a start codon—in bacterial cell DNA with a single experiment and, through ...

4 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Mark Thomas
5 / 5 (1) Mar 14, 2019
This is welcome good news. It is sad how SLS and Orion have set back NASA's manned space program. Maybe the Senate will let go of SLS when they realize SLS is going to look particularly bad when SpaceX sends a bunch of tourists around the moon for chump change while SLS and Orion are still wasting tens of billions of dollars pretending to develop old single-use technology. By analogy, SLS is a coal burning sedan in development that costs 100 times as much as a new Tesla Model 3 available now.

The way I see it, there is no way we will reach Mars in the 2030s doing business as usual. NASA has hinted at this by noting that SLS/Orion is soaking up so much money that the funds don't exist to develop the rest of the necessary infrastructure. The only way I can see it being possible is a tight NASA-SpaceX alliance, and even then, it will be very difficult. Fingers crossed, it looks like somebody at NASA is thinking along similar lines.
Whys
3 / 5 (1) Mar 14, 2019
Sometimes things take longer than expected. Just look at the Hubble, the James Web, or the ISS. They've all gone way over cost and time. Did we quit?

I look forward to SpaceX's future capabilities, but it is just too soon to have no public option. By hook, or by crook, or by congressional order, SLS will be completed. It will serve its purpose while rocketry transitions to the private era. We'll launch at least 2, no doubt.
Mark Thomas
5 / 5 (1) Mar 14, 2019
This isn't about quitting, it is about gouging NASA's manned space program to financial death with SLS/Orion. Because nobody can provide a reasonable explanation as to why SLS/Orion are so late and so far over budget, we have to assume there isn't a reasonable explanation. After wasting billions between 2006 and 2011 on related projects, Boeing and company said using proven space shuttle main rocket engines (RS-25) and space shuttle solid fuel rocket boosters would save time and money. So what happened? Orion is a 30% larger Apollo capsule with flat screens. At this point, nobody is impressed by a big 50 year old capsule design with flat screens. In the same time frame Boeing and Lockheed spent ~$30B and counting to achieve nothing, SpaceX has essentially perfected the reusable first stage rocket, successfully launched the Falcon Heavy and developed its Dragon capsule for a relative pittance. SpaceX should be rewarded and Boeing/Lockheed should be investigated.
rogerdallas
not rated yet Mar 16, 2019
Boeing-- that's all you need to know. If it ever is completed and launched it will most likely take a nose dive.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.