Arkansas opens probe into ExxonMobil spill

April 2, 2013
An ExxonMobil sign is seen at a gas station on September 20, 2008 in Manassas, Virginia. Arkansas opened an investigation into an ExxonMobil pipeline that spilled thousands of gallons of crude and forced the evacuation of two dozen homes, the state's attorney general said Tuesday.

Arkansas opened an investigation into an ExxonMobil pipeline that spilled thousands of gallons of crude and forced the evacuation of two dozen homes, the state's attorney general said Tuesday.

The spill comes weeks before what is expected to be a raucous public hearing on the controversial Keystone XL pipeline, a $5.3 billion project to bring oil from Canada's all the way to refineries in the US state of Texas.

Images of thick black crude flowing down a residential street and flooding yards in Mayflower, Arkansas has renewed concerns about the tar sand oil, which say is harder to clean up because it sinks in water.

Mayflower resident Amber Bartlett, who was among those evacuated after the spill on Friday, told on Tuesday that a cul de sac in her neighborhood was "just covered ... nothing but oil."

"It looked like a river flowing down the road," she said.

Arkansas Attorney General Dustin McDaniel sent a letter to instructing the oil giant to preserve all documents related to the spill and ongoing cleanup in anticipation of "future litigation."

Thousands of gallons of crude swamped the and edged towards a lake after the 60-year-old underground Pegasus pipeline ruptured.

"This incident has damaged private property and Arkansas's natural resources," McDaniel said in a statement.

Mayflower has a population of about 1,700 people and is located north of Little Rock.

On March 1, the State Department released a draft environmental impact statement suggesting the rerouted Keystone XL pipeline, which would transport some 830,000 barrels a day, would have no major impact on the environment.

The statement examined how the 1,179-mile (1,897-kilometer) pipeline could affect wildlife and surrounding areas as it travels from the tar sands of Alberta, Canada to refineries in Texas.

However, the report stopped short of recommending that President approve the project.

Opponents and supporters now have until April 22 to comment, after which a final recommendation will be drawn up. The public hearing will be held on April 18 in Nebraska.

Explore further: US to hold Keystone pipeline hearing in Nebraska

Related Stories

US to hold Keystone pipeline hearing in Nebraska

March 27, 2013

The US State Department said Wednesday it will hold a public meeting in Nebraska in April on a controversial $5.3 billion Canada-to-Texas oil pipeline, just days before a key consultation period ends.

Impact statement on US oil pipeline due in August

July 23, 2011

The US State Department said Friday it expects by mid-August to release a final environmental impact statement on a proposed $13 billion oil pipeline that would stretch from Canada to Texas.

US to study alternate route for US-Canada pipeline

November 10, 2011

The US government said Thursday it would study an alternate route for a controversial US-Canada oil pipeline, and pushed back its final decision on the project until 2013 -- after next year's presidential elections.

Nebraska welcomes new pipeline route

November 16, 2011

Nebraska's governor on Tuesday welcomed a controversial US-Canada pipeline now that it will be rerouted away from the state's sensitive wetlands, but environmentalists vowed to keep up the fight.

Recommended for you

Greenland now a major driver of rising seas: study

June 26, 2017

Ocean levels rose 50 percent faster in 2014 than in 1993, with meltwater from the Greenland ice sheet now supplying 25 percent of total sea level increase compared with just five percent 20 years earlier, researchers reported ...

Biodiversity loss from deep-sea mining will be unavoidable

June 26, 2017

Biodiversity losses from deep-sea mining are unavoidable and possibly irrevocable, an international team of 15 marine scientists, resource economists and legal scholars argue in a letter published today in the journal Nature ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.