Plant-based plastics not necessarily greener than oil-based relatives

October 21, 2010
Results of life-cycle assessment with biopolymers listed as PLA-NW, PLA-G, PHA-G, and PHA-S. Hybrid is B-PET. This table is from Environmental Science & Technology. Credit: Tabone, et al., ES&T

An analysis of plant and petroleum-derived plastics by University of Pittsburgh researchers suggests that biopolymers are not necessarily better for the environment than their petroleum-based relatives, according to a report in Environmental Science & Technology. The Pitt team found that while biopolymers are the more eco-friendly material, traditional plastics can be less environmentally taxing to produce.

Biopolymers trumped the other plastics for biodegradability, low toxicity, and use of renewable resources. Nonetheless, the farming and chemical processing needed to produce them can devour energy and dump fertilizers and pesticides into the environment, wrote lead author Michaelangelo Tabone (ENG, A&S '10), who conducted the analysis as an undergraduate student in the lab of Amy Landis, a professor of civil and environmental engineering in Pitt's Swanson School of Engineering. Tabone and Landis worked with James Cregg, an undergraduate chemistry student in Pitt's School of Arts and Sciences; and Eric Beckman, codirector of Pitt's Mascaro Center for Sustainable Innovation and the George M. Bevier Professor of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering in Pitt's Swanson School. The project was supported by the National Science Foundation.

The researchers examined 12 —seven petroleum-based polymers, four biopolymers, and one hybrid. The team first performed a life-cycle assessment (LCA) on each polymer's preproduction stage to gauge the environmental and health effects of the energy, raw materials, and chemicals used to create one ounce of plastic pellets. They then checked each plastic in its finished form against principles of green design, including biodegradability, energy efficiency, wastefulness, and toxicity.

Biopolymers were among the more prolific polluters on the path to production, the LCA revealed. The team attributed this to agricultural fertilizers and pesticides, extensive land use for farming, and the intense chemical processing needed to convert plants into plastic. All four biopolymers were the largest contributors to ozone depletion. The two tested forms of sugar-derived polymer—standard polylactic acid (PLA-G) and the type manufactured by Minnesota-based NatureWorks (PLA-NW), the most common sugar-based plastic in the United States—exhibited the maximum contribution to eutrophication, which occurs when overfertilized bodies of water can no longer support life. One type of the corn-based polyhydroyalkanoate, PHA-G, topped the acidification category. In addition, biopolymers exceeded most of the petroleum-based polymers for ecotoxicity and carcinogen emissions.

Once in use, however, biopolymers bested traditional polymers for ecofriendliness. For example, the sugar-based plastic from NatureWorks jumped from the sixth position under the LCA to become the material most in keeping with the standards of green design. On the other hand, the ubiquitous plastic polypropylene (PP)—widely used in packaging—was the cleanest polymer to produce, but sank to ninth place as a sustainable material.

Interestingly, the researchers found that the petroleum-plant hybrid biopolyethylene terephthalate, or B-PET, combines the ills of agriculture with the structural stubbornness of standard plastic to be harmful to produce (12th) and use (8th).

Landis is continuing the project by subjecting the polymers to a full LCA, which will also examine the materials' environmental impact throughout their use and eventual disposal.


Polymer Material  Green Design Rank LCA Rank
Polylactic acid-NatureWorks (PLA-NW) Sugar, cornstarch 1 6
Polyhydroxyalkanoate-Stover (PHA-S) Corn stalks 2 4
Polyhydroxyalkanoate-General (PHA-G) Corn kernels 2 8
Polylactic acid-General (PLA-G) Sugar, cornstarch 4 9
High-density polyethylene (HDPE) Petroleum 5 2
Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Petroleum 6 10
Low-density polyethylene (LDPE) Petroleum 7 3
Biopolyethylene terephthalate (B-PET) Petroleum, plants 8 12
Polypropylene (PP) Fossil fuels 91
General purpose polystyrene (GPPS) Petroleum 10 5
Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) Chlorine, petroleum 11 7
Polycarbonate (PC) 12 11

Explore further: Sharp Develops New Technology to Blend Plant-Based Plastic with Waste Plastic

More information: pubs.acs.org/journal/esthag

Related Stories

Helping corn-based plastics take more heat

September 1, 2010

A team of scientists from USDA and a cooperating company are working to make corn-derived plastics more heat tolerant -- research that may broaden the range of applications for which these plastics could be used as an alternative ...

'Green' plastics could help reduce carbon footprint

February 11, 2009

More than 20 million tons of plastic are placed in U.S. landfills each year. Results from a new University of Missouri study suggest that some of the largely petroleum-based plastic may soon be replaced by a nonpolluting, ...

Recommended for you

Could 'cocktail geoengineering' save the climate?

July 24, 2017

Geoengineering is a catch-all term that refers to various theoretical ideas for altering Earth's energy balance to combat climate change. New research from an international team of atmospheric scientists published by Geophysical ...

Allowable 'carbon budget' most likely overestimated

July 24, 2017

While most climate scientists, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, implicitly define "pre-industrial" to be in the late 1800's, a true non-industrially influenced baseline is probably further in the past, ...

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Caliban
5 / 5 (1) Oct 21, 2010
I see that they fail to include the damage caused through the extraction and refining of fossil-fuel derived plastics as part of the LCA for those plastics(or at least so it appears), so I wonder just how even-handed this study is.

At the same time, the main importance of the study is more likely that it has identified the areas of bio-derived plastics most in need of remediation, so it is therefore not a total waste, and may well have the opposite results than those envisioned by the authors(assuming a pro-petro bias, which may not at all be a valid assumption).
TDK
1 / 5 (4) Oct 21, 2010
It just depends, whether the Deep Water Horizon event, various tanker disasters and all consequences of oil wars are included into Green Design Rank (or similar ranks) or not.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.