Researcher finds missing link between ancient toothed whales and modern baleen whales
August 18, 2011 by Bob Yirka
Evolution of mysticete skull features linked to feeding, based on the phylogeny in the study of Fitzgerald. Cetacean artwork by C. Buell. Image (c) Biology Letters, doi:10.1098/rsbl.2011.0690
(PhysOrg.com) -- Erich Fitzgerald, an Australian paleontologist, believes he has found the missing link between ancient toothed whales that caught and ate fish and modern baleen whales that eat by sucking in huge volumes of water and then filter out the krill and shrimp in it.
In his paper, published in the Royal Society journal, Biology Letters, Fitzgerald describes the skeletal remains of Janjucetus hunderi, named for the beach where the original jaw bone was found; "cetus" Greek, for whale and Staumm Hunder, the youngster who found the fragment. More recently, Fitzgerald discovered that amateur fossil hunter Brian Crichton had more such bones enabling him to build a more complete picture of the ancient (25 million year old) creature.
Fitzgerald suggests that modern baleen whales, a class of whales that use a filter called a baleen to filter food from sea water, evolved from toothed fish eaters to the modern giants we now see, via the Janjucetus, a creature about the size of a contemporary dolphin, but one that had a very different jaw structure.
Baleen whales, a class that include the Blue Whale, the largest animal known to have ever existed, have a jaw that is not fused in front, allowing it to flex and expand so that it can draw in huge amounts of water when lunging at a mass of krill. Ancient whales on the other hand, had jaws very much like dolphins, or even humans for that matter. They opened their mouths and grabbed fish swimming by, using their teeth as mini harpoons, much as Killer Whales do today. Janjucetus falls somewhere in-between; it has a jaw that is fused in front but the upper jaws are inordinately wide, and its snout is short. Also, its mouth is proportionately big for its body.
Fitzgerald theorizes that all of these characteristics put together indicate that Janjucetus captured and ate its prey differently than both its early ancestors and its modern counterpart. Instead of grabbing fish as they came by, Janjucetus sucked in the water surrounding them, pulling them in with it, then chomped down to capture them.
Its this early sucking, or hovering as Fitzgerald describes it, that after several million years, led to the un-fusing of the jaw, the gradual loss of teeth and the appearance of the baleen.
More information: Archaeocete-like jaws in a baleen whale, Biology Letters, Published online before print August 17, 2011, doi:10.1098/rsbl.2011.0690
Abstract
The titanic baleen whales (Cetacea, Mysticeti) have a bizarre skull morphology, including an elastic mandibular symphysis, which permits dynamic oral cavity expansion during bulk feeding. How this key innovation evolved from the sutured symphysis of archaeocetes has remained unclear. Now, mandibles of the Oligocene toothed mysticete Janjucetus hunderi show that basal mysticetes had an archaeocete-like sutured symphysis. This archaic morphology was paired with a wide rostrum typical of later-diverging baleen whales. This demonstrates that increased oral capacity via rostral widening preceded the evolution of mandibular innovations for filter feeding. Thus, the initial evolution of the mysticetes' unique cranial form and huge mouths was perhaps not linked to filtering plankton, but to enhancing suction feeding on individual prey.
© 2011 PhysOrg.com
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
What would stain as translucent on light-coloured fabric?
20 hours ago
-
How do I identify different bacteria on culture plates?
May 26, 2012
-
Why Do Dogs do Strange things...
May 25, 2012
-
What does exophillic and endophillic mean in terms of mosquito and their control?
May 24, 2012
-
Semen stains glows under black lights (uv light)?
May 23, 2012
-
Question on Human Chromosome 2
May 23, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Biology
More news stories
Manufacturing genes to attack flu virus
An international research team has manufactured a new protein that can combat deadly flu epidemics.
34 minutes ago |
not rated yet |
0
|
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
19 hours ago |
3.3 / 5 (18) |
69
More plant species responding to global warming than previously thought
(Phys.org) -- Far more wild plant species may be responding to global warming than previous large-scale estimates have suggested.
May 22, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (14) |
18
|
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
May 26, 2012 |
4.8 / 5 (4) |
7
For monogamous sparrows, it doesn't pay to stray (but they do it anyway)
It's quite common for a female song sparrow to stray from her breeding partner and mate with the male next door, but a new study shows that sleeping around can be costly.
May 22, 2012 |
5 / 5 (2) |
7
|
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy
Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...
Same gene that stunts infants' growth also makes them grow too big: research
UCLA geneticists have identified the mutation responsible for IMAGe* syndrome, a rare disorder that stunts infants' growth. The twist? The mutation occurs on the same gene that causes Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, which makes ...
Aug 18, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (16)
There is unfortunately no way for the researcher to confirm that those changes from one fish did in fact occur. There was no one there to record that change and there are no great number of missing links that have been found between this one and the ultimate baleen whale. The researcher is on a hiding to nothing.
Fitzgerald's theory will have to remain as it is: an unsubstantiated theory which cannot be falsified either since the same non-witnessed argument can be applied.
It might be better to postulate that the fish were created that way. The same validation or non-validation can be applied but the explanation just fits better since there are only two discreet, non-interlinked specimens/objects to be observed - with no further physical evidence available to draw his conclusion.
Aug 18, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
"Common ancestor", please, and even that's a bit misleading.
Aug 18, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
But it's not "hovering", which is what helicopters due, it's "Hoovering", named after the vacuum cleaner.
Aug 18, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (8)
It would appear that you and like-minded people have built your creationalist house on sand rather than founding it on rocks as paleontologists have done!
Aug 18, 2011
Rank: 4.2 / 5 (5)
But evolution, like any good science, can be tested, even if it is not "witnessed". You test the predictions. For example, in the case of whales, we can say "I believe these whales descended from the toothed whales, and therefore I predict that an analysis of the proteins coating their red blood cells will reveal approximately the number of divergences we can predict from bifurcation of the gene pool X million years ago". Now, if these animals were all "created" there would be no reason for a baleen whale's blood cells to be comparable to a toothed whales. They could easily more closely resemble the blood cells of a walrus or even a penguin! And to expect that the detectable, countable, accumulated genetic drift revealed by those proteins would match the mathematical models, that would be just too much! But we can look, and we can compare genes... and guess what we find? Our discoveries support our predictions. Testable.
Aug 18, 2011
Rank: 4.4 / 5 (7)
Fixed that for you
Aug 18, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
@kevinrtrs, you are creationist! No doubts)
Aug 19, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Other than that, interesting article. Fills in a piece.
Aug 19, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
Fish mammal. Be careful--your ignorance is showing (again).
Or the creation that you allege.
He has company in you, then.
Mr. Pot, do be careful in how you describe Mr. Kettle! (For the literature-impaired: kevinrts claims a lack of physical evidence, while proffering none to support his side.)
Aug 19, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Aug 19, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
Aug 19, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
And he cannot lose any credibility doing it, because he's never had any credibility and doesn't want any credibility. He'll be playing the same games when he's 80, and still snickering.
Aug 20, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Missing links are being found and yet you're denying their relevance. Typical.