Researcher finds missing link between ancient toothed whales and modern baleen whales

August 18, 2011 by Bob Yirka report

Researcher finds missing link between ancient toothed whales and modern baleen whales

Enlarge

Evolution of mysticete skull features linked to feeding, based on the phylogeny in the study of Fitzgerald. Cetacean artwork by C. Buell. Image (c) Biology Letters, doi:10.1098/rsbl.2011.0690

(PhysOrg.com) -- Erich Fitzgerald, an Australian paleontologist, believes he has found the missing link between ancient toothed whales that caught and ate fish and modern baleen whales that eat by sucking in huge volumes of water and then filter out the krill and shrimp in it.

In his paper, published in the Royal Society journal, Biology Letters, Fitzgerald describes the of Janjucetus hunderi, named for the beach where the original was found; "cetus" Greek, for whale and Staumm Hunder, the youngster who found the fragment. More recently, Fitzgerald discovered that amateur Brian Crichton had more such bones enabling him to build a more complete picture of the ancient (25 million year old) creature.

Fitzgerald suggests that modern , a class of whales that use a filter called a baleen to filter food from sea water, evolved from toothed fish eaters to the modern giants we now see, via the Janjucetus, a creature about the size of a contemporary dolphin, but one that had a very different jaw structure.

Baleen whales, a class that include the , the largest animal known to have ever existed, have a jaw that is not fused in front, allowing it to flex and expand so that it can draw in huge amounts of water when lunging at a mass of . Ancient whales on the other hand, had jaws very much like dolphins, or even humans for that matter. They opened their mouths and grabbed fish swimming by, using their teeth as mini harpoons, much as do today. Janjucetus falls somewhere in-between; it has a jaw that is fused in front but the upper jaws are inordinately wide, and its snout is short. Also, its mouth is proportionately big for its body.

Fitzgerald theorizes that all of these characteristics put together indicate that Janjucetus captured and ate its prey differently than both its early ancestors and its modern counterpart. Instead of grabbing fish as they came by, Janjucetus sucked in the water surrounding them, pulling them in with it, then chomped down to capture them.

It’s this early sucking, or “hovering” as Fitzgerald describes it, that after several million years, led to the un-fusing of the jaw, the gradual loss of teeth and the appearance of the baleen.

More information: Archaeocete-like jaws in a baleen whale, Biology Letters, Published online before print August 17, 2011, doi:10.1098/rsbl.2011.0690

Abstract
The titanic baleen whales (Cetacea, Mysticeti) have a bizarre skull morphology, including an elastic mandibular symphysis, which permits dynamic oral cavity expansion during bulk feeding. How this key innovation evolved from the sutured symphysis of archaeocetes has remained unclear. Now, mandibles of the Oligocene toothed mysticete Janjucetus hunderi show that basal mysticetes had an archaeocete-like sutured symphysis. This archaic morphology was paired with a wide rostrum typical of later-diverging baleen whales. This demonstrates that increased oral capacity via rostral widening preceded the evolution of mandibular innovations for filter feeding. Thus, the initial evolution of the mysticetes' unique cranial form and huge mouths was perhaps not linked to filtering plankton, but to enhancing suction feeding on individual prey.

© 2011 PhysOrg.com

4.9 /5 (8 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

kevinrtrs
Aug 18, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (16)
It's really sad when you see how people have to lie to themselves to make a story fit in with the evolutionary mythology.
There is unfortunately no way for the researcher to confirm that those changes from one fish did in fact occur. There was no one there to record that change and there are no great number of missing links that have been found between this one and the ultimate baleen whale. The researcher is on a hiding to nothing.
Fitzgerald's theory will have to remain as it is: an unsubstantiated theory which cannot be falsified either since the same non-witnessed argument can be applied.
It might be better to postulate that the fish were created that way. The same validation or non-validation can be applied but the explanation just fits better since there are only two discreet, non-interlinked specimens/objects to be observed - with no further physical evidence available to draw his conclusion.
Y8Q412VBZP21010
Aug 18, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Oh AARGH ... they had to put "Missing Link" in the title?

"Common ancestor", please, and even that's a bit misleading.
Ben_Levy
Aug 18, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Very interesting!
But it's not "hovering", which is what helicopters due, it's "Hoovering", named after the vacuum cleaner.
Peteri
Aug 18, 2011

Rank: 4.5 / 5 (8)
@kevinrts: Likewise, using your logic, you were not around to witness your chosen deity supposedly creating the universe 6000 years ago and so all you have to rely on are dubious calculations based on time-lines derived from collected stories in your religious texts.

It would appear that you and like-minded people have built your creationalist house on sand rather than founding it on rocks as paleontologists have done!
Ben_Levy
Aug 18, 2011

Rank: 4.2 / 5 (5)
@kevinrts: fish? Lost you there.
But evolution, like any good science, can be tested, even if it is not "witnessed". You test the predictions. For example, in the case of whales, we can say "I believe these whales descended from the toothed whales, and therefore I predict that an analysis of the proteins coating their red blood cells will reveal approximately the number of divergences we can predict from bifurcation of the gene pool X million years ago". Now, if these animals were all "created" there would be no reason for a baleen whale's blood cells to be comparable to a toothed whales. They could easily more closely resemble the blood cells of a walrus or even a penguin! And to expect that the detectable, countable, accumulated genetic drift revealed by those proteins would match the mathematical models, that would be just too much! But we can look, and we can compare genes... and guess what we find? Our discoveries support our predictions. Testable.
Guy_Underbridge
Aug 18, 2011

Rank: 4.4 / 5 (7)
It's really sad when you see how people have to lie to themselves to make a story fit in with their religious mythology.


Fixed that for you
grosyhpgrosyhpgrosyhp
Aug 18, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
It might be better to postulate that the fish...

@kevinrtrs, you are creationist! No doubts)
badger1966
Aug 19, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
One wonders if there is someplace on this Earth where one can avoid religious extremists. Wonder if there are this many Flat-Earthers in Germany.

Other than that, interesting article. Fills in a piece.
Silverhill
Aug 19, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
It's really sad when you see how people have to lie to themselves to make a story fit in with ... mythology.
Yes, very sad indeed.

changes from one fish
Fish mammal. Be careful--your ignorance is showing (again).

There was no one there to record that change
Or the creation that you allege.

The researcher is on a hiding to nothing.
He has company in you, then.

It might be better to postulate that the fish were created that way. The same validation or non-validation can be applied but the explanation just fits better ... with no further physical evidence available to draw his conclusion.
Mr. Pot, do be careful in how you describe Mr. Kettle! (For the literature-impaired: kevinrts claims a lack of physical evidence, while proffering none to support his side.)
Silverhill
Aug 19, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
correction to above, since the "not equals" symbol did not show up: "fish does not equal mammal"
Sinister1811
Aug 19, 2011

Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
@Kevinrts Evolution isn't mythology. It's been proven time and time again. Especially by those studying fossils, examining the missing links between species. By looking at fossils you can see the gradual changes from one species to another over millions of years. Species change and adapt to different conditions over time, as different mutations occur in different gene pools. It's not really mythology.
Y8Q412VBZP21010
Aug 19, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Kevin just comes to PHYSORG to moon people. He issues his standard re-runs of verbiage, collects 1-star votes, and snickers because he has accomplished his mission of being annoying.

And he cannot lose any credibility doing it, because he's never had any credibility and doesn't want any credibility. He'll be playing the same games when he's 80, and still snickering.
aroc91
Aug 20, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Thanks for conforming to the stereotype, kevin. lol

Missing links are being found and yet you're denying their relevance. Typical.
Rank 4.9 /5 (8 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

Manufacturing genes to attack flu virus

An international research team has manufactured a new protein that can combat deadly flu epidemics.

Biology / Biotechnology

created 34 minutes ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0 | with audio podcast

Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history

(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.

Biology / Evolution

created 19 hours ago | popularity 3.3 / 5 (18) | comments 69

More plant species responding to global warming than previously thought

(Phys.org) -- Far more wild plant species may be responding to global warming than previous large-scale estimates have suggested.

Biology / Ecology

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 4.6 / 5 (14) | comments 18 | with audio podcast

Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru

Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.

Biology / Ecology

created May 26, 2012 | popularity 4.8 / 5 (4) | comments 7

For monogamous sparrows, it doesn't pay to stray (but they do it anyway)

It's quite common for a female song sparrow to stray from her breeding partner and mate with the male next door, but a new study shows that sleeping around can be costly.

Biology / Plants & Animals

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (2) | comments 7 | with audio podcast


Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study

At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...

Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture

When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases – and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if – it will be an expensive undertaking.

'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...

T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows

By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...

Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy

Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...

Same gene that stunts infants' growth also makes them grow too big: research

UCLA geneticists have identified the mutation responsible for IMAGe* syndrome, a rare disorder that stunts infants' growth. The twist? The mutation occurs on the same gene that causes Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, which makes ...