Army Corps critic sues La. university over firing

February 14, 2010 By CAIN BURDEAU , Associated Press Writer

(AP) -- Ivor van Heerden, a Louisiana State University scientist and a widely cited expert on levee failures after Hurricane Katrina, sued his college on Wednesday, alleging he was fired for his criticism of the Army Corps of Engineers.

In the lawsuit, van Heerden alleges that LSU officials violated his free speech and civil rights. Van Heerden claims LSU officials were afraid of losing federal grants and contracts because of his outspokenness. The suit alleges wrongful termination and seeks unspecified damages.

LSU Chancellor Michael Martin said he could not comment on the lawsuit. But he added that LSU "wholeheartedly supports its faculty and values their research, teaching and scholarly publishing."

Amanda Jones, a corps spokeswoman, said the agency would not comment on pending litigation.

LSU officials have said van Heerden was not qualified to speak as an expert on the wide range of issues he was commenting on in interviews with a plethora of media outlets and groups after Katrina.

The lawsuit, filed in state court in Baton Rouge, names the LSU board of Supervisors and four top-level LSU officials as defendants. The individuals named in the lawsuit - Brooks Keel, Robert Twilley, George Voyiadjis and David Constant - either did not return telephone calls seeking comment or could not be reached.

At a news conference at a New Orleans hotel, Van Heerden said the case is "about the right of academics to speak out."

"I came to America because of the ," the South African native said. "This is sending a very chilly message to academics across the country, but especially here in Louisiana."

Van Heerden was told last year that his contract would not be renewed when it ends in May. Van Heerden was an associate professor not protected by tenure.

His firing became a flashpoint, drawing the ire of numerous academics, activists and residents who felt that a rare voice of dissent was being punished. On Wednesday, several prominent figures - including two well-known writers, a law professor at Tulane University and Harry Shearer, a New Orleans actor and filmmaker - spoke in support of van Heerden at the news conference.

"This is the classic instance of speaking truth to power," said John Barry, the author of "Rising Tide," an important work on the Corps of Engineers and the Mississippi River.

Shearer said that to his knowledge "no one has been demoted, no one has been fired, no one has lost their job" at the Corps of Engineers because of the levees failures. Contrasting that with van Heerden's case, he added: "I found something very wrong with this picture."

Martin, the LSU chancellor, said he reviewed the decision not to renew van Heerden's contract and determined that it was "handled appropriately." The decision to fire van Heerden was done before Martin took over at LSU.

Martin said that LSU "values its role as the state's flagship university" and that it would "continue its work to help preserve Louisiana's coastline, mitigate hurricane damage and search for ways to protect the state's coastal populations."

After Katrina hit, van Heerden was among the first scientists to allege that Army Corps' faulty designs and engineering had led to the collapse of floodwalls and levees protecting New Orleans.

He also led a state forensic analysis, known as Team Louisiana, into the levee breaches. Van Heerden described his work and theories in a book called "The Storm: What Went Wrong and Why During ."

Explore further: Rensselaer engineers to inspect levees


Related Stories

Rensselaer engineers to inspect levees

October 10, 2005

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute scientists are going to New Orleans as part of an expert team investigating levee failures caused by Hurricane Katrina.

Senate hearing focuses on repairing levees in New Orleans

November 18, 2005

It is clear that there were multiple causes for the levee failures in New Orleans, but researchers need to gather more data to better understand what they were and how to rebuild properly after the devastation caused by Hurricane ...

Study: Southern Louisiana is sinking

December 5, 2005

A Louisiana State University scientist says southern Louisiana is sinking and restoring flooded marshes to protect the state's Gulf coast is futile.

Recommended for you

Who you gonna trust? How power affects our faith in others

October 6, 2015

One of the ongoing themes of the current presidential campaign is that Americans are becoming increasingly distrustful of those who walk the corridors of power – Exhibit A being the Republican presidential primary, in which ...

Ancient genome from Africa sequenced for the first time

October 8, 2015

The first ancient human genome from Africa to be sequenced has revealed that a wave of migration back into Africa from Western Eurasia around 3,000 years ago was up to twice as significant as previously thought, and affected ...

The hand and foot of Homo naledi

October 6, 2015

The second set of papers related to the remarkable discovery of Homo naledi, a new species of human relative, have been published in scientific journal, Nature Communications, on Tuesday, 6 October 2015.

From a very old skeleton, new insights on ancient migrations

October 9, 2015

Three years ago, a group of researchers found a cave in Ethiopia with a secret: it held the 4,500-year-old remains of a man, with his head resting on a rock pillow, his hands folded under his face, and stone flake tools surrounding ...

Mexican site yields new details of sacrifice of Spaniards

October 9, 2015

It was one of the worst defeats in one of history's most dramatic conquests: Only a year after Hernan Cortes landed in Mexico, hundreds of people in a Spanish-led convey were captured, sacrificed and apparently eaten.

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (1) Feb 14, 2010
Wonder how they define "unqualified to comment"?
And, is LSU distancing itself from the good professor in order to shield themselves from slanderous/libelous alegations, or from fear of some other(and, I think, extremely unlikely) governmental backlash? Normally, a university would just take disciplinary action against an outspoken professor like this that they percieved as making trouble. If anything, being cut loose like this makes him that much more likely to be a respondent in this lawsuit(assuming he is- qualified)- free to testify without any need to try to guard his employer's interests. Hmmm...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.