Scientists target East Coast rocks for CO2 storage

January 4, 2010
Left: Basalts inland (hatched) and offshore (grey) in the New York area may be useful for storing CO2. Right: An even larger formation occurs around South Carolina and Georgia. Squares indicated potential sites for exploration. Credit: David S. Goldberg et al.

Scientists say buried volcanic rocks along the heavily populated coasts of New York, New Jersey and New England, as well as further south, might be ideal reservoirs to lock away carbon dioxide emitted by power plants and other industrial sources. A study this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences outlines formations on land as well as offshore, where scientists from Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory say the best potential sites may lie.

Underground burial, or sequestration, of globe-warming carbon dioxide is the subject of increasing study across the country. But up till now, research in New York has focused on inland sites where plants might send power-plant emissions into shale, a that underlies much of the state. Similarly, a proposed coal-fired plant in Linden, N.J. would pump liquefied CO2 offshore into sedimentary sandstone. The idea is controversial because of fears that CO2 might leak. By contrast, the new study targets basalt, an igneous rock, which the scientists say has significant advantages.

Some basalt on land is already well known and highly visible. The vertical cliffs of the Palisades, along the west bank of the Hudson River near Manhattan, are pure basalt, and the rocks, formed some 200 million years ago, extend into the hills of central New Jersey. Similar masses are found in central Connecticut. Previous research by Lamont scientists and others shows that injected into basalt undergoes natural chemical reactions that will eventually turn it into a solid mineral resembling limestone. If the process were made to work on a large scale, this would help obviate the danger of leaks.

The study's authors, led by geophysicist David S. Goldberg, used existing research to outline more possible basalt underwater, including four areas of more than 1,000 square kilometers each, off northern New Jersey, Long Island and Massachusetts. A smaller patch appears to lie more or less under the beach of New Jersey's Sandy Hook, peninsula, opposite New York's harbor and not far from the proposed plant in Linden. The undersea formations are inferred from seismic and gravity measurements. "We would need to drill them to see where we're at," said Goldberg. "But we could potentially do deep burial here. The coast makes sense. That's where people are. That's where are needed. And by going offshore, you can reduce risks." Goldberg and his colleagues previously identified similar formations off the U.S. Northwest.

Goldberg said the undersea formations are potentially most useful, for several reasons. For one, they are deeper—an important factor, since CO2 pressurized into a liquid would have to be placed at least 2,500 feet below the surface for natural pressure to keep it from reverting to a gas and potentially then making its way back to the surface. The basalts on land are relatively shallow, but those at sea are covered not only by water, but hundreds or thousands of feet of sediment, and appear to extend far below the seabed. In addition to providing pressure, sediments on top would form impermeable caps, said Goldberg. The basalts are thought to contain porous, rubbly layers with plenty of interstices where CO2 could fit, simply by displacing seawater. On land, by contrast, there are concerns that drilling and injection could disturb aquifers or otherwise get in the way of neighbors. The scientists estimate that just the small Sandy Hook basin may contain about seven cubic kilometers of the rock, with enough pore space to hold close to a billion tons of CO2—the equivalent of the emissions from four 1-billion-watt coal-fired plants over 40 years.

"The basalt itself is very reactive, and in the end, you make limestone," said coauthor Dennis Kent, who is also at Rutgers University. "It's the ultimate repository."

Previous research has identified other areas of basalt sprinkled along the Appalachians. The largest mass of all appears to extend offshore of Georgia and South Carolina, as well as inland. This coast also is populous, and would make a good target, said Goldberg. "The next step would be to get some exploratory surveying and drilling going," he said. The paper suggests a half-dozen spots around New York including the Sandy Hook area, and three off South Carolina, to start with.

Explore further: Ohio CO2 sequestration test well completed

More information: "CO2 Sequestration in central atlantic magmatic province basalts: Potential on-shore and off-shore reservoirs," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Related Stories

Geologists map rocks to soak CO2 from air

March 5, 2009

A new report by scientists at Columbia University's Earth Institute and the US Geological Survey points to an abundant supply of carbon-trapping rock in the US that could be used to help stabilize global warming.

Carbon capture shows major potential in China

October 14, 2009

( -- Carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies may represent a cost-effective, viable option to help China continue to meet its growing energy demands while also delivering deep and sustained reductions ...

Fighting climate change by turning CO2 to stone

November 17, 2009

( -- While politicians debate the best ways to cut global carbon dioxide emissions, researchers at Idaho National Laboratory's Center for Advanced Energy Studies are charging ahead on a strategy to defuse the ...

Recommended for you

Amazon deforestation leaps 16 percent in 2015

November 28, 2015

Illegal logging and clearing of Brazil's Amazon rainforest increased 16 percent in the last year, the government said, in a setback to the aim of stopping destruction of the world's greatest forest by 2030.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Jan 05, 2010
NIMBY, lets just start drilling for oil off the populous centers as well.
not rated yet Jan 05, 2010
Sounds like a great plan to acidify the ground water and create massive sinkholes in about 100 years. Urban congestion a problem? How about a 2012-sized sinkhole under the eastern seaboard?
1 / 5 (1) Jan 06, 2010
OK so this begs the question; WHY? Why are they even looking into this when its been proven the dangers of C02 are bogus? I guess no matter what you say some will keep pushing the lie about GW and C02 because they have invested so much into taking that stance that they can't admit their wrong no matter what. That or they are getting some kind of goverment subsadized money and don't want to lose it.

New motto for science;"Its not whats true that matters but what you need to say or take a stance on to get funding for your research." It wasn't too many years ago the Church, when it was in power, tried hard to push the Flat Earth theory. Good thing for us they lost on that one ey?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.