Terrorism risk determines homeland security spending

June 5, 2008

A new study in Policy Studies Journal reveals that measures of terrorism risk are found to be positive determinants of Homeland Security funding, while measures of political influence and party affiliation of elected officials do not affect distribution of grants.

Tyler Prante of Central Washington University and Alok K. Bohara of the University of New Mexico statistically analyzed the funding pattern of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from 2004 to 2006.

Results indicate that DHS funding outcomes are generally consistent with assessed terrorism risk, in particular with respect to high-risk states. Despite assertions to the contrary, researchers did not identify a positive relationship between party affiliation or congressional influence and funding outcomes.

"Though our results should be taken with appropriate consideration, we find the funding pattern to be inconsistent with the claim of DHS grants being distributed by political and not terrorism risk considerations," the authors conclude.

Source: Wiley

Explore further: Trusting hackers with your security? You'd better be able to sort the whitehats from the blackhats

Related Stories

When to teach children about violent extremism

March 6, 2014

Dealing with the rise of homegrown terrorism has prompted governments to take novel approaches in combating such threats. The UK government, for example, has recently pushed for schools to teach children as young as four ...

How math helps stop oil spills and plane crashes

December 20, 2013

Jason Merrick, Ph.D., says that his daughters tell people that their father stops oil spills, plane crashes and terrorist attacks with math. That's one way to describe Merrick's research, which at its core involves developing ...

Recommended for you

French teen finds 560,000 year-old tooth (Update)

July 28, 2015

A 16-year-old French volunteer archaeologist has found an adult tooth dating back around 560,000 years in southwestern France, in what researchers hailed as a "major discovery" Tuesday.

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

xen_uno
2.3 / 5 (3) Jun 05, 2008
My opinion is that the risk is low ... and would be much lower if we got the hell out of Iraq. The mission objective was accomplished long ago. So now I consider Homeland Security just another federal jobs program that as a bonus, enables the government to spy on every aspect of our lives, without warrant. The Patriot Act? It stinks too as it's just another mis-guided political assault on our liberties ... the result of paranoid reactionary politicians whose brand of "feel good" legislation knows no end.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.