Terrorism risk determines homeland security spending

June 5, 2008

A new study in Policy Studies Journal reveals that measures of terrorism risk are found to be positive determinants of Homeland Security funding, while measures of political influence and party affiliation of elected officials do not affect distribution of grants.

Tyler Prante of Central Washington University and Alok K. Bohara of the University of New Mexico statistically analyzed the funding pattern of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from 2004 to 2006.

Results indicate that DHS funding outcomes are generally consistent with assessed terrorism risk, in particular with respect to high-risk states. Despite assertions to the contrary, researchers did not identify a positive relationship between party affiliation or congressional influence and funding outcomes.

"Though our results should be taken with appropriate consideration, we find the funding pattern to be inconsistent with the claim of DHS grants being distributed by political and not terrorism risk considerations," the authors conclude.

Source: Wiley

Explore further: The 'gay cure' experiments that were written out of scientific history

Related Stories

Can identifying mental illness stop terror attacks?

December 15, 2014

A radical Muslim killed a soldier outside Canada's Parliament. A right-wing extremist opened fire on buildings in Texas' capital and tried to burn down the Mexican Consulate. An Al-Qaida-inspired assailant hacked an off-duty ...

Recommended for you

An inflexible diet led to the disappearance of the cave bear

August 23, 2016

Senckenberg scientists have studied the feeding habits of the extinct cave bear. Based on the isotope composition in the collagen of the bears' bones, they were able to show that the large mammals subsisted on a purely vegan ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

xen_uno
2.3 / 5 (3) Jun 05, 2008
My opinion is that the risk is low ... and would be much lower if we got the hell out of Iraq. The mission objective was accomplished long ago. So now I consider Homeland Security just another federal jobs program that as a bonus, enables the government to spy on every aspect of our lives, without warrant. The Patriot Act? It stinks too as it's just another mis-guided political assault on our liberties ... the result of paranoid reactionary politicians whose brand of "feel good" legislation knows no end.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.