Time-lapse analysis offers new look at how cells repair DNA damage

Time-lapse analysis offers new look at how cells repair DNA damage
The top image shows a cell before radiation exposure. The bottom image shows the same cell after exposure to 1 Gy of radiation. The bright spots are called radiation induced foci. They indicate the movement of repair proteins toward a site in the cell where DNA damage has occurred. Credit: Berkeley Lab

Time-lapse imaging can make complicated processes easier to grasp—think of a stitched-together sequence of photos that chronicles the construction of a building. Now, scientists from the Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) are using a similar approach to study how cells repair DNA damage.

They developed a computerized way to measure DNA in thousands of human mammary epithelial cells before and after they're exposed to ionizing radiation. Microscopy images are acquired about every thirty minutes over a span of up to two days, and the resulting sequence of images shows ever-changing hotspots inside cells where DNA is under repair. The approach even tracks individual cells as they move about a petri dish, a leap in automation that has been difficult to achieve.

Their new time-lapse technique is already yielding insights into how cells repair DNA strand breaks, which is key to understanding how people respond to . Scientists study DNA damage for a number of reasons, from learning how to protect astronauts from long-term exposure to cosmic rays to refining radiotherapy protocols that are designed to kill tumors.

Before this approach, researchers could track DNA repair in only about ten cells simultaneously over time. Another method tracks DNA repair in thousands of cells, but it requires removing and studying subsets of cells at different time intervals. It can't track DNA repair in the same cells over time.

"Our approach combines the best of both worlds," says Sylvain Costes of Berkeley Lab's Life Sciences Division. "We're analyzing the same cells over many hours, and we're studying thousands of them, which allows us to arrive at statistically significant findings."

Costes developed the approach with fellow Berkeley Lab scientists Walter Georgescu, Alma Osserian, Maria Rojec, and Jonathan Tang.

At the heart of their technique are algorithms that lock onto and track as they move about a cell culture. The algorithms can also follow that are created when cells divide. Another component of their approach is the use of human mammary epithelial cells that are modified so that DNA repair proteins, called 53BP1, are fluorescently labeled. This modification, when combined with algorithms that can analyze thousands of cells simultaneously, enables the technique to scan multiple cells and classify areas inside each one where 53BP1 proteins cluster at DNA damage sites. These clusters are called "radiation induced foci."

The Berkeley Lab scientists have used their cell-tracking and DNA-damage-classification algorithms to analyze human mammary beginning 24 hours before exposure to high and low doses of radiation, and continuing until 24 hours after exposure.

Among their findings is a newly discovered phenomenon: Although DNA damage occurs in random areas throughout a cell, the DNA repair process, as evidenced by the clustering of 53BP1 proteins, is localized in very specific regions of the cell nucleus.

"This could lead to problems," says Costes. "If the repair process is constrained to specific domains, then there is more of a chance that some of the breaks will meet and get merged together. This would increase the risk of chromosomal rearrangements, such as translocation, where pieces of chromosomes get mixed together, which is considered a precursor to cancer."

The scientists also found a big difference in how cells respond to DNA damage relative to radiation dose. Some of the differences are well known, such as the fact that high doses of radiation cause to stop dividing, whereas low doses don't arrest cell division. But they also found new processes. At high doses, for example, they discovered that small clusters of 53BP1 proteins merge into larger clusters. This further confirms the risk of chromosomal rearrangement at high doses.

A paper describing their imaging method, with movies of their work, was recently published in the journal PLOS One.

Explore further

Sall4 is required for DNA repair in stem cells

More information: "Characterizing the DNA Damage Response by Cell Tracking Algorithms and Cell Features Classification Using High-Content Time-Lapse Analysis." PLoS ONE 10(6): e0129438. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129438
Journal information: PLoS ONE

Citation: Time-lapse analysis offers new look at how cells repair DNA damage (2015, September 2) retrieved 21 August 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2015-09-time-lapse-analysis-cells-dna.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Sep 02, 2015
A repair system in the cells represent a huge problem for the idea that life arose spontaneously from purely physical and chemical processes without any intervention by an intelligent agent.

Repair means that there is a stored body of knowledge that specifies how a system or individual component should appear and function. That stored body of knowledge needs to be decoded and then the decoded knowledge needs to be applied to affect the repair.
Tools for decoding are required as well as the necessary materials and knowhow to apply those materials at the right place in the right sequence and at the right time.

All such logical and sequential workings cannot arise from any random process. Not at the ultra small, nano level of thermal and chemical activity found at the cellular level.

Life was created, it didn't just pop into existence from dead materials, all by itself.

Sep 03, 2015

Drivel from a stupid creationist.

Sep 03, 2015
Life was created
@fred the proselytizing TROLL
lets see... you haven't been able to prove comments about the bible being validated by anthropologists, the evidence supporting your comments about math and genetics (or population) or your claims about religion here: http://phys.org/n...its.html

now you want to share your belief about life without evidence in this thread?

if you're going to comment, try actually linking EVIDENCE with it instead of looking like an idiot posting trolling baiting comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more