Largest solar panel plant in US rises in Fla.

Oct 24, 2009 By CHRISTINE ARMARIO , Associated Press Writer
Acres of open land filled with solar panels is seen in a Wednesday, Oct. 21 2009 photo, at the DeSoto Next Generation Solar Energy Center in Ardacia, Fla., which will be the nation's largest solar photovoltaic plant in the country. The center is set for completion by the end of this month. (AP Photo/Christine Armario)

(AP) -- Greg Bove steps into his pickup truck and drives down a sandy path to where the future of Florida's renewable energy plans begin: Acres of open land filled with solar panels that will soon power thousands of homes and business.

For nearly a year, construction workers and engineers in this sleepy Florida town of citrus trees and cattle farms have been building the nation's largest solar panel energy plant. Testing will soon be complete, and the facility will begin directly converting sunlight into energy, giving Florida a momentary spot in the solar energy limelight.

The Desoto Next Generation Center will power a small fraction of Florida Power & Light's 4-million plus customer base; nevertheless, at 25 megawatts, it will generate nearly twice as much energy as the second-largest photovoltaic facility in the U.S.

The White House said President Barack Obama is scheduled to visit the facility Tuesday, when it officially goes online and begins producing power for the electric grid.

As demand grows and more states create mandates requiring a certain percentage of their energy come from renewable sources, the size of the plants is increasing. The southwest Florida facility will soon be eclipsed by larger projects announced in Nevada and California.

"We took a chance at it and it worked out," said Bove, construction manager at the project, set on about 180 acres of land 80 miles southeast of Tampa. "There's a lot of backyard projects, there's a lot of rooftop projects, post offices and stores. Really this is one of the first times where we've taken a technology and upsized it."

Despite its nickname, the Sunshine State hasn't been at the forefront of . Less than 4 percent of Florida's energy has come from renewable sources in recent years. And unlike California and many other states, Florida lawmakers haven't agreed to setting clean energy quotas for electric companies to reach in the years ahead.

California, New Jersey and Colorado have led the country in installing photovoltaic systems; now Florida is set to jump closer to the top with the nation's largest plant yet.

The Desoto facility and two other solar projects Florida Power & Light is spearheading will generate 110 megawatts of power, cutting greenhouse gas emissions by more than 3.5 million tons. Combined, that's the equivalent of taking 25,000 cars off the road each year, according to figures cited by the company.

The investment isn't cheap: The Desoto project cost $150 million to build and the power it supplies to some 3,000 homes and businesses will represent just a sliver of the 4 million-plus accounts served by the state's largest electric utility.

But there are some economic benefits: It created 400 jobs for draftsmen, carpenters and others whose work dried up as the southwest Florida housing boom came to a closure and the recession set in. Once running, it will require few full-time employees.

Mike Taylor, director of research and education at the nonprofit Solar Electric Power Association in Washington, said the project puts Florida "on the map."

"It's currently the largest," Taylor said of the Desoto photovoltaic plant. "But it certainly won't be the last."

There are two means of producing electricity from the sun: photovoltaic cells that directly convert ; and thermal power, which uses mirrors to heat fluid and produce steam to run a turbine power generator.

Taylor said a one- or two-megawatt project was considered large not long ago. The size has slowly increased each year.

Overall, the United States still trails other nations in building photovoltaic plants.

Spain and Germany have made larger per capita commitments to solar power because of aggressive government policies, said Stephen Smith, executive director of the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy. And China has announced plans to pay up to 50 percent of the price of solar power systems of more than 500 megawatts.

"If we don't get our market right and send the right market signals and really support growing this technology, we will be buying from other countries," Smith said.

In April, Arizona-based manufacturer First Solar Inc. announced plans to build a 48-megawatt plant in Nevada, producing power for about 30,000 homes. Even that pales compared to recently announced plans for a 2 gigawatt facility in China. First Solar has initial approval to build it.

©2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Explore further: A platform to help consumers achieve sustainable energy consumption

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

New Florida City To Run On Solar Power

Apr 13, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- A new Florida city, Babcock Ranch, will power 19,500 homes by solar power and cost the average customer's monthly bill an additional 31 cents. This will be the first city on earth powered ...

Ground broken on Nevada solar plant

Feb 13, 2006

Ground was broken for the construction of a 300-acre solar power plant in Boulder City, Nev., expected to meet the power demands of about 40,000 households.

Canada awards $1.1M for energy projects

Nov 21, 2007

The Canadian government is investing in solar energy, awarding $1.1 million for projects promoting photovoltaic and solar thermal power technologies.

Desert power: A solar renaissance

Apr 01, 2008

What does the future hold for solar power? “Geotimes” magazine looks into more efficient ways of turning the sun’s power into electricity in its April cover story, “Desert Power: A Solar Renaissance.”

German firms join for solar-thermal push in the U.S.

Aug 18, 2009

German firms Solar Millennium AG and MAN Ferrostaal AG on Monday said they formed a joint venture to build up to three utility-scale plants in Southern California at a cost about $1 billion each.

Recommended for you

Image: Testing electric propulsion

Aug 20, 2014

On Aug. 19, National Aviation Day, a lot of people are reflecting on how far aviation has come in the last century. Could this be the future – a plane with many electric motors that can hover like a helicopter ...

Where's the real value in Tesla's patent pledge?

Aug 20, 2014

With the much-anticipated arrival next month of electric vehicle manufacturer Tesla's Model S to Australian shores, it's a good time to revisit Tesla's pledge to freely share patents. ...

New type of solar concentrator doesn't block the view

Aug 19, 2014

(Phys.org) —A team of researchers at Michigan State University has developed a new type of solar concentrator that when placed over a window creates solar energy while allowing people to actually see through ...

User comments : 11

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Buyck
3 / 5 (3) Oct 24, 2009
Good good... we must have such initiatives on more places in the world. And spending more money in higher efficiency of solar panels to at least 35 to 50%.
Smurf
Oct 24, 2009
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
3432682
3.1 / 5 (7) Oct 24, 2009
$50,000 per home or business. Brilliant. How much money will we waste before we catch on?
mikejuly24
3.7 / 5 (3) Oct 24, 2009
I am a bit uneasy with the numbers here. The article claims that the Florida plant of 25MW will be able to supply 3,000 homes and businesses, where as, a 48MW plant in Nevada(less than double the size) will be able to power 30,000 homes. Either these numbers don't make sense or the businesses and homes in Florida use about 5 times more energy.
Sean_W
3 / 5 (4) Oct 24, 2009
I have no axe to grind against alternative energies and I think R&D into them are important but 150 million dollars to supply energy to 3000 homes doesn't sound like a good investment. I don't know how long they expect the equipment to last or if some of that $150 million is budgeted for replaceing it over time but it just sounds like a bad idea. Forcing through huge projects before the technology is commercially viable using government funds is a sure way to turn people against the concept.
daqman
5 / 5 (2) Oct 24, 2009
I pulled out my electricity bill and took a look. My home (five bedrooms with a family of four) uses on average about 40 kWh per day. So approximately an average of 1.7 kW continuous power. So a 25 MW plant should power 14,700 homes not 3000. That's still 10,000 per home but that's less than 10 years worth of power bills at the going rate and, presumably, the plant will last longer than that.
grgfraiser
3 / 5 (2) Oct 24, 2009
it's all good till a hurricane hits
RealScience
3.7 / 5 (3) Oct 24, 2009
Dagman - A photovoltaic solar plant only produces power when the sun is shining, whereas you divided your use by 24 hours per day.

In Florida for flat panels on one-axis trackers this would be a factor of four difference, so it should be about 3700 homes like yours, or $40,000 per year.

That is too expensive to be practical from a purely short-term economic viewpoint.

In the long term, however, it does help bring solar costs down faster and bring forward the day that solar can stand on its own.

I'm not fond of subsidies, but oil is subsidized, too (the Iraq war alone costs $2 per gallon, and yes, it is about oil), and nuclear power has been subsidized (governments paid for development, and still pay for insurance).

But I have to agree with Sean_W that this particular project seems a bit too expensive, not even following the recent downward trend in costs.
GeToChKn
3 / 5 (2) Oct 24, 2009
For the all people saying the math doesn't work, try your English a bit more first. "3000 homes and businesses" and "30,000 homes". Maybe the businesses use more electricity than a home, and therefore you won't get the same mW per house you're looking for.
GeToChKn
not rated yet Oct 24, 2009
Also, looking at per capita energy consumption by state shows that Florida uses more energy than Arizona, therefore again allowing more homes in Arizona than Florida off the same power amount.
RAL
3 / 5 (2) Oct 25, 2009
I'm all for research on solar but throwing 150 million into an operating facility that will only supply 3000 homes is like taking money out and burning it. There are far cheaper and more efficient ways of producing electricity. It's not like we have money to spend this foolishly.
dirk_bruere
4 / 5 (1) Oct 26, 2009
It is more cost effective to install on domestic premises. That way the cost is amortized against the retail cost of electricity from the mains.