New design points a path to the 'ultimate' battery

October 29, 2015
A schematic showing the formation of lithium hydroxide (LiOH) on the graphene electrode on discharging a non-aqueous lithium-oxygen battery in the presence of the redox mediator, lithium iodide, and trace water. On charging, the iodide is oxidized to iodine, which helps to remove the LiOH and reform the bare graphene electrode. Credit: Tao Liu, Gabriella Bocchetti and Clare P. Grey

Scientists have developed a working laboratory demonstrator of a lithium-oxygen battery which has very high energy density, is more than 90% efficient, and, to date, can be recharged more than 2000 times, showing how several of the problems holding back the development of these devices could be solved.

Lithium-oxygen, or lithium-air, batteries have been touted as the 'ultimate' due to their theoretical energy density, which is ten times that of a lithium-ion battery. Such a high energy density would be comparable to that of gasoline - and would enable an electric car with a battery that is a fifth the cost and a fifth the weight of those currently on the market to drive from London to Edinburgh on a single charge.

However, as is the case with other next-generation batteries, there are several practical challenges that need to be addressed before lithium-air batteries become a viable alternative to gasoline.

Now, researchers from the University of Cambridge have demonstrated how some of these obstacles may be overcome, and developed a lab-based demonstrator of a lithium-oxygen battery which has higher capacity, increased energy efficiency and improved stability over previous attempts.

Their demonstrator relies on a highly porous, 'fluffy' carbon electrode made from graphene (comprising one-atom-thick sheets of carbon atoms), and additives that alter the chemical reactions at work in the battery, making it more stable and more efficient. While the results, reported in the journal Science, are promising, the researchers caution that a practical lithium-air battery still remains at least a decade away.

"What we've achieved is a significant advance for this technology and suggests whole new areas for research - we haven't solved all the problems inherent to this chemistry, but our results do show routes forward towards a practical device," said Professor Clare Grey of Cambridge's Department of Chemistry, the paper's senior author.

Many of the technologies we use every day have been getting smaller, faster and cheaper each year - with the notable exception of batteries. Apart from the possibility of a smartphone which lasts for days without needing to be charged, the challenges associated with making a better battery are holding back the widespread adoption of two major clean technologies: electric cars and grid-scale storage for solar power.

A schematic showing the formation of lithium hydroxide (LiOH) on the graphene electrode on discharging a non-aqueous lithium-oxygen battery in the presence of the redox mediator lithium iodide and trace water (top). On charging, the iodide is oxidized to iodine, which helps to remove the LiOH and reform the bare graphene electrode (bottom). Credit: Tao Liu, Gabriella Bocchetti and Clare P. Grey

"In their simplest form, batteries are made of three components: a positive electrode, a negative electrode and an electrolyte,'' said Dr Tao Liu, also from the Department of Chemistry, and the paper's first author.

In the lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries we use in our laptops and smartphones, the negative electrode is made of graphite (a form of carbon), the positive electrode is made of a metal oxide, such as lithium cobalt oxide, and the electrolyte is a lithium salt dissolved in an organic solvent. The action of the battery depends on the movement of lithium ions between the electrodes. Li-ion batteries are light, but their capacity deteriorates with age, and their relatively low energy densities mean that they need to be recharged frequently.

Over the past decade, researchers have been developing various alternatives to Li-ion batteries, and lithium-air batteries are considered the ultimate in next-generation energy storage, because of their extremely high . However, previous attempts at working demonstrators have had low efficiency, poor rate performance, unwanted chemical reactions, and can only be cycled in pure oxygen.

What Liu, Grey and their colleagues have developed uses a very different chemistry than earlier attempts at a non-aqueous lithium-air battery, relying on lithium hydroxide (LiOH) instead of lithium peroxide (Li2O2). With the addition of water and the use of lithium iodide as a 'mediator', their battery showed far less of the chemical reactions which can cause cells to die, making it far more stable after multiple charge and discharge cycles.

By precisely engineering the structure of the electrode, changing it to a highly porous form of graphene, adding lithium iodide, and changing the chemical makeup of the electrolyte, the researchers were able to reduce the 'voltage gap' between charge and discharge to 0.2 volts. A small voltage gap equals a more efficient battery - previous versions of a lithium-air battery have only managed to get the gap down to 0.5 - 1.0 volts, whereas 0.2 volts is closer to that of a Li-ion battery, and equates to an energy efficiency of 93%.

The highly porous graphene electrode also greatly increases the capacity of the demonstrator, although only at certain rates of charge and discharge. Other issues that still have to be addressed include finding a way to protect the metal electrode so that it doesn't form spindly lithium metal fibres known as dendrites, which can cause batteries to explode if they grow too much and short-circuit the battery.

Additionally, the demonstrator can only be cycled in pure oxygen, while the air around us also contains carbon dioxide, nitrogen and moisture, all of which are generally harmful to the metal electrode.

"There's still a lot of work to do," said Liu. "But what we've seen here suggests that there are ways to solve these problems - maybe we've just got to look at things a little differently."

"While there are still plenty of fundamental studies that remain to be done, to iron out some of the mechanistic details, the current results are extremely exciting - we are still very much at the development stage, but we've shown that there are solutions to some of the tough problems associated with this technology," said Grey.

Explore further: Tellurium electrodes boost lithium batteries

More information: "Cycling Li-O2 batteries via LiOH formation and decomposition," by T. Liu et al. Science,

Related Stories

Doubling the lifetime of lithium-air batteries

October 7, 2015

Since they were first commercialised in 1991, lithium-ion batteries have come a long way. The global market is expected to reach EUR 30 billion by 2019, with applications in almost every industry – from intermittent renewable ...

New battery technologies take on lithium-ion

July 22, 2015

Lithium-ion batteries remain the technology-of-choice for today's crop of electric cars, but challengers are revving up to try to upset the current order. An article in Chemical & Engineering News (C&EN), the weekly newsmagazine ...

The road to longer battery life

October 14, 2015

Are you sick of your phone's battery dying after only a few hours? Researchers from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology are hard at work on improving something called the solid electrolyte interphase as a ...

Recommended for you

Microsoft aims at Apple with high-end PCs, 3D software

October 26, 2016

Microsoft launched a new consumer offensive Wednesday, unveiling a high-end computer that challenges the Apple iMac along with an updated Windows operating system that showcases three-dimensional content and "mixed reality."

Making it easier to collaborate on code

October 26, 2016

Git is an open-source system with a polarizing reputation among programmers. It's a powerful tool to help developers track changes to code, but many view it as prohibitively difficult to use.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (9) Oct 29, 2015
We need this now to ditch fossil fuels. All our futures depend on it. Give these guys unlimited resources to do it in 2 years . They built the A bomb that way.
1 / 5 (7) Oct 29, 2015
At least a decade away? Stop wasting research money on it. Something else will have come along that's better in that time period.
5 / 5 (6) Oct 29, 2015
lithium is actually fairly common, it is the lithium percentage of the ore and the associated extraction costs and problems has been the issue that brought the lithium deposits and extraction... to center around the easy to extract deposits -as the only viable way to go.

Very recently, a new, inexpensive method was found to extract lithium from the low concentration ores.

This has the effect of increasing the estimated size of extractable lithium to approximately 10x times the prior estimates of known worldwide reserves.

Yes, that's right, cost effective lithium reserves jumped by a factor of about 10x.

Thus, this, or any other lithium usage issue proposed as a manufacturing concern is now fully supportable as a worldwide energy model.
5 / 5 (5) Oct 29, 2015
Hum. Yeah. Well I built an Aluminum Air battery using Al, carbon foam, and H20/borax as an electrolytic. The problem is H2O/borax drys out. Iodine on the other hand could wet the carbon foam and not dry out. Quick, to the lab!

I release this to the public domain. Have fun.
5 / 5 (7) Oct 30, 2015
At least a decade away? Stop wasting research money on it.

All the stuff that is getting to the production stages now was 'a decade away' a decade ago (or more). With your kind of approach we would have never even invented fire.
not rated yet Oct 30, 2015
well arranged stuff....
1 / 5 (1) Oct 30, 2015
Apparently the human boundaries for credible "hope funding" have been discovered to be about one decade. Within one decade we have been told we would have economically competitive and sustainable:

- algae biofuels (disproven)
- biofuels (disproven)
- fusion reactors ( https://en.wikipe...reactor)
- optimized lithium batteries
- recycled bioactive phosphate fertilizers
- reversing population growth (China canceled their One Child Policy yesterday because they don't have enough young people to support their over 60 population of 400M.)

and this list goes on and on. Remarkably - we continue to hope, and still don't prioritize our critical research funding.

2.3 / 5 (3) Oct 30, 2015
Steorn's Orbo tech is launching, with products imminent from various licencees.

Initially it's gonna be mainly small consumer products, but this is just the beginning...

Still, we'll need bateries as accumulators so it's all good..
3.5 / 5 (2) Oct 31, 2015
While I agree with you on some of the stuff hitting the markets now I've also seen many many so called improvements in the last five years that some of those should have also start being available but we are using pretty much the same battery tech for almost 10 years now. Some of these various scientist and research groups should get together! We could possibly have great batteries on the market by now. Same thing with solar cells. There have been so many improvements in the last 5 years they should be 75% efficient by now if all those improvements were actually used together. I guess I'm a bit frustrated with all these so called improvements when nothing really seems to be improving much in either area. At least not stuff I can buy on the open market.
5 / 5 (4) Nov 01, 2015
Same thing with solar cells. There have been so many improvements in the last 5 years they should be 75% efficient by now

Change takes time. Entrenched industries are very hard to move. Perhaps the 10 year marker is deceptive - and we really have to look at 50 year trends. Here is an interesting look at what has happened with solar cells - https://en.wikipe...6%29.jpg
But if you understand that despite all of this development - electricity from solar panels is still only approaching grid parity (see second graph here - http://cleantechn...-charts/ - and you still have the problem of intermittency. I think the tipping point is close, but agree that there is often over optimism regarding the 10 year mark. So many articles love the term 'game changer' - it is good for grabbing eye balls.
5 / 5 (3) Nov 02, 2015
Probably the biggest reason we haven't seen faster change is due to the economics of our energy supply. Fossil oil is cheap. If we had a carbon cap and trade system, oil would cost more and we would be bringing these new battery technologies to market faster.
3 / 5 (2) Nov 21, 2015
Steorn's Orbo tech is launching, with products imminent from various licencees
Yah currently it only puts out enough energy to charge a cell phone.
Very recently, a new, inexpensive method was found to extract lithium from the low concentration ores.
What, this?

-Sounds messy.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.