Michigan Tech Professor Helps Draft Road Map to Fuel-Efficient Trucks, Cars

July 5, 2010 By Marcia Goodrich
Peterbilt 320 Hybrid, Peterbilt Image

(PhysOrg.com) -- Manufacturers can take advantage of multiple strategies to build fuel-saving cars and trucks, says two congressionally mandated reports by the National Academies, but they won't come without a price.

Presidential Professor John Johnson of Michigan Technological University served on the two committees that evaluated various technologies to reduce and improve consumption. One focused on medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, such as tractor-trailers, transit buses and work trucks. The other addressed fuel consumption in passenger cars, sport-utility vehicles, minivans and other light-duty vehicles.

The medium- and heavy-duty vehicle report also recommends approaches that manufacturers and federal agencies can consider as they develop fuel consumption regulations. Congress began regulating the fuel economy of cars and light-duty trucks back in 1975, but there are no such standards for buses and big trucks, which account for about 26 percent of the used in the US.

At a May 21 Rose Garden press conference, President Barak Obama signed a memorandum on directing the EPA and the National Highway Transportation Safety Agency to enact new standards in 2014 for medium- and heavy-duty vehicles and for light-duty vehicles for 2017-25 based on the reports' findings.

The report recommends that any regulation of medium- and heavy-duty vehicles should reflect the efficiency with which a vehicle moves goods or passengers, such as gallons per ton-100 mile, a unit that reflects the amount of fuel a vehicle would use to carry a ton of goods 100 miles.

"This is going to bring down the costs for transporting goods, serving businesses and consumers alike," Obama said of the impending standards for heavy- and medium-duty vehicles. "It will reduce pollution, given that freight vehicles produce roughly one-fifth of the related to transportation." In addition, it will reinforce US leadership in the clean energy sector, he said.

According to the report, using advanced diesel engines in tractor-trailers could lower their fuel consumption by up to 20 percent by 2020, and improved aerodynamics could yield an 11-percent reduction. Hybrid power trains could lower the fuel consumption of vehicles that stop frequently, such as garbage trucks and transit buses, by as much 35 percent.

While these improvements would raise the price of the vehicle, the report notes that many of these technologies would pay for themselves handily, even at today's energy prices.

The report estimates the costs and maximum fuel savings that could be achieved by 2020 if a combination of technologies were used. The best cost-benefit ratio was offered by tractor-trailers, whose fuel use could be cut by about 50 percent for about $84,600 per truck; the improvements would be paid for over ten years provided fuel prices are at least $1.10 per gallon.

The fuel use of motor coaches could be lowered by 32 percent for an estimated $36,350 per bus, which would be cost-effective if the price of fuel is $1.70 per gallon or higher.

Diesel was about $2.95 per gallon on June 7.

Johnson predicted that lower fuel consumption would be more acceptable to the trucking industry. "This sector is driven far more by fuel efficiency" than light-duty vehicle users, he said. "The biggest users in this category are over-the-road tractor trailers. They burn 50 percent of fuel in heavy- and medium-duty vehicles, and drivers pay more attention to fuel consumption."

Spark-ignition engines will continue to be the dominant type of engine in the US for the next 10 to 15 years and have seen many technology improvements that are producing significant fuel savings. As a result, automobile manufacturers are able to create packages of technologies that can meet cost and effectiveness targets in small, incremental steps. For example, the report notes the promise of cylinder deactivation - which enables a six- or eight-cylinder engine to run on fewer cylinders when full-engine power is not needed, such as on flat loads. Deactivation can reduce fuel consumption by as much as 10 percent at a retail vehicle price increase of $350 to $500, the report says.

According to its estimates, adopting the full range of technologies to medium- and full-size passenger vehicles with spark-ignition engines could reduce fuel consumption by 29 percent at a cost of $2,200 to the consumer. Replacing spark-ignition engines with diesel engines and components would yield fuel savings of about 37 percent for approximately $5,900 per vehicle. Spark-ignition engines with hybrid components would reduce by 43 percent at an increase of $6,000 per vehicle.

Johnson was less optimistic about how such recommendations might be received by the average car buyer. To meet tougher standards, he said, the auto industry will probably focus on measures like lowering vehicle weight, improving the efficiency of gasoline engines and trying to sell smaller cars. "Price is very important; hybrids and the diesels are costly, and a lot of people can't afford them," he says. "You can't expect them to sell in large numbers unless fuel sells for over four dollars a gallon."

If Congress and the American public were truly committed to reducing fuel usage, Johnson said, we would support higher fuel taxes and use the revenue to encourage a more energy-efficient lifestyle. "Unfortunately," he said, "increasing the fuel tax is dead on arrival relative to the political process."

Explore further: Bush considers raising fuel standards

Related Stories

Bush considers raising fuel standards

March 23, 2006

The Bush administration is reportedly considering raising the fuel standards that are required for vehicles sold across the nation.

Feds proposed new fuel economy rules

March 30, 2006

The federal government has proposed new fuel economy standards for light trucks, including the largest sport utility vehicles.

NREL Estimates U.S. Hybrid Electric Vehicle Fuel Savings

June 21, 2007

Hybrid electric vehicles have saved close to 230 million gallons – or 5.5 million barrels – of fuel in the United States since their introduction in 1999, according to a recent analysis conducted at the U. S. Department ...

2008 fuel consumption guide released today

January 17, 2008

Shopping for a new vehicle that saves money on fuel and also helps the environment just got easier. The Honourable Lawrence Cannon, Minister of Transport, on behalf of the Honourable Gary Lunn, Minister of Natural Resources, ...

Recommended for you

Inferring urban travel patterns from cellphone data

August 29, 2016

In making decisions about infrastructure development and resource allocation, city planners rely on models of how people move through their cities, on foot, in cars, and on public transportation. Those models are largely ...

How machine learning can help with voice disorders

August 29, 2016

There's no human instinct more basic than speech, and yet, for many people, talking can be taxing. 1 in 14 working-age Americans suffer from voice disorders that are often associated with abnormal vocal behaviors - some of ...

Sponge creates steam using ambient sunlight

August 22, 2016

How do you boil water? Eschewing the traditional kettle and flame, MIT engineers have invented a bubble-wrapped, sponge-like device that soaks up natural sunlight and heats water to boiling temperatures, generating steam ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (1) Jul 05, 2010
If Congress and the American public were truly committed to reducing fuel usage, Johnson said, we would support higher fuel taxes

not rated yet Jul 05, 2010
the only way to do it where fossil fuel lobbies are strong is to focus on finding cash for r&d and incentives to produce new tech. Since we cant penalise the old tech we need to promote the new, big prizes and competitions are a good way to go too. Our politicians are all too cowardly to do what is needed here.
not rated yet Jul 06, 2010
These numbers ignore the insanely inflated cost of maintenance and repair.

Also, I call BS on the claim that modern engines get better mileage anyway. Any 1980's era Japanese vehicle got better mileage than the new vehicles even claim to get, and probably STILL gets better mileage.

I have a theory that Toyota and Mazda actually quit making their vehicles as good as they used to, because they were working themselves out of business.

Anyway, the newer the vehicle, the less mileage it actually gets.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.