Poll: Americans believe U.S. headed in wrong direction on energy

October 20, 2011

A poll released today by The University of Texas at Austin found less than 14 percent of Americans think the country is headed in the right direction on energy. Of more than 3,400 consumers surveyed, 84 percent were worried about U.S. consumption of oil from foreign sources and 76 percent about a lack of progress in developing better ways to use energy efficiently and develop renewable sources.

While jobs overwhelmingly top the list of national concerns, the majority of Americans care about energy issues. For instance, the poll found 68 percent are concerned about the of their homes and 60 percent about global energy issues.

The inaugural University of Texas at Austin Energy Poll, developed by the McCombs School of Business' Energy Management and , seeks to provide an objective, authoritative look at consumer attitudes and perspectives on key energy issues. It is designed to help inform national discussion, business planning and policy development. To be conducted biannually, the online poll rates leadership on energy issues, measures consumers' energy priorities, and tracks knowledge and behaviors. The poll's design was a collaborative effort of academics and polling experts, nongovernmental organizations, large energy users and energy producers.

"With energy so critical to our quality of life and economic health, we saw a real need for an ongoing, comprehensive and independent look at consumer energy perspectives," said Bill Powers, president of The University of Texas at Austin.

"This survey shows that the public craves leadership on energy issues. Through our analysis of the data, we hope to add an authoritative voice to public debate on energy issues. The Energy Poll fits well with our commitment as a world-class research university to change the world for the better," he said.

Future iterations of the poll also will provide a single-number "energy index" that tracks consumer opinions on energy issues over time and will explore topical energy issues.

Results indicate a lack of satisfaction with leadership for our energy future. Participants were asked to rate their satisfaction and dissatisfaction with the job that 26 different organizations, corporations, institutions and government bodies were doing to address energy issues. Respondents indicated greatest satisfaction with their own performance, followed by scientists and engineers, academic and research institutions, and renewable energy firms. The public overall was much less satisfied with how government and big business are addressing energy issues. Congress — with ratings of 8 percent satisfied, 71 percent dissatisfied — ranked dead last.

Energy prices are the most compelling and immediate issue for consumers. The majority of Americans see energy prices as high and likely to increase. For instance, 69 percent of middle-aged households with children expect energy costs to grow as a percentage of their household budget in the next year. And while only 24 percent of respondents consider themselves knowledgeable about energy, four out of five consumers are interested in learning more about how to reduce their energy use.

Energy is not viewed as simply a short-term issue. More believe that the nation's energy situation will be worse in 25 years than believe it will be better, although younger and more Democratic voters are more optimistic about the future. More than half (57 percent) of Americans expect that they will make changes in their behavior and adopt new technologies to address these issues. Younger respondents, in particular, were more likely to say they expected to use energy-saving alternatives in the next five years, including smart meters, solar panels, and hybrid or electric vehicles.

Perhaps unsurprisingly in a tough economy, consumers were less concerned about energy's impact on the environment than on their wallets. But they ranked economic growth (37 percent) only slightly more important than preventing harm to the environment (33 percent), suggesting support for a balanced approach to energy policy.

The University of Texas at Austin Poll reflects the views of 3,406 Americans collected during Sept. 14-25. The data were weighted using U.S. Census Bureau figures, as well as propensity scores, to ensure that the sample's composition reflects that of the actual U.S. population.

Explore further: Canadian ministers discuss energy issues

More information: For more information, visit: www.utenergypoll.utexas.edu

Related Stories

Canadian ministers discuss energy issues

September 22, 2005

Canada's energy ministers ended their annual meeting Wednesday in St. Andrews, New Brunswick, concerned about the impact of higher energy costs.

Poll: People want to battle climate change

November 5, 2007

A BBC poll indicated most people around the world said they would make personal sacrifices -- including higher energy bills -- to address climate change.

New standards for Energy Star fridges

August 4, 2007

The U.S. Department of Energy is increasing the energy efficiency criteria required for refrigerators carrying the Energy Star label.

Recommended for you

Old, meet new: Drones, high-tech camera revamp archaeology

November 24, 2017

Scanning an empty field that once housed a Shaker village in New Hampshire, Jesse Casana had come in search of the foundations of stone buildings, long-forgotten roadways and other remnants of this community dating to the ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (2) Oct 20, 2011
MY 7AM RANT: Our choice: Go on subsidizing 19th-20th century fossil fuel tech., or bite the bullet and endure some short-term economic pain for long-term gain. The longer we procrastinate in transitioning to renewable energy sources, the greater will be the pain during changeover. IMO, most oil refineries achieved their ROIs years ago, but they go on wringing $$ out of them, and in other news, the only clean coal is in the commercials. Finally, these corporations are not people and should not have the "money = free speech" protections given them by the supreme court. Will Rodgers said it about 80 years ago: "We have the best government that money can buy." How hard to we have to be kicked in the butt before "we the people" take back our government. As for me: Decentralized power generation (solar, wind, heat pumps, SAFE small nuclear)...also: electric cars and hi-speed rail, advanced batteries made in USA, etc. INVEST IN THE FUTURE, NOT THE PAST!
1 / 5 (2) Oct 21, 2011
I am skeptical as to the integrity of this and other polls. For this one, I ask "Who are the 14% who think the country IS headed in the right direction?" Everyday we edge ever closer to economic collapse, do to the absurd "multiculturism" agenda, we have a splintered population where many do not speak the language of the land, immigrants seem to no longer come here to be "Americans", instead, come to be foriegn citizens in a foreign land". Illegal immigration is continuing to drive down labor rates and along with that, the standard of living, as well as condenming 12 million to a quasislave status.
So, again, who exactly are those 14%? I suspect this is a supposition not an actual demographic.
5 / 5 (3) Oct 22, 2011

I run my EV on RE at a fraction of the cost of a similar ICE using forklift EV tech.

Facts are democracts have been trying to make decent energy policy so our people don't get ripped off or go into another recession caused by oil prices which caused 5 of the last 6 recessions.

You all can be foolish and get ripped off but 's vare very simple you can build your own cheaply.

The easy solutions are NG for big trucks and EV with rental or onboard generator for unlimited range.
0.9 / 5 (50) Oct 22, 2011
Well said jerry!
not rated yet Oct 22, 2011
"The poll's design was a collaborative effort of academics and polling experts, nongovernmental organizations, large energy users and energy producers."

I question the advisability if listening to large energy users and energy producers since those are the entities least likely to want change. Energy producers want the government to keep their hands off regulation because they don't want to retool their power plants to be more efficient and less polluting. Large energy users dont want their pocketbooks penalized by energy companies when those producers eventually have to retool. Both sides of that coin prefer things to stay as is. Wouldn't that skew the poll results?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.