Where is solar power headed?

July 22, 2015 by Renee Cho
Photovoltaic array at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada

Most experts agree that to have a shot at curbing the worst impacts of climate change, we need to extricate our society from fossil fuels and ramp up our use of renewable energy.

On July 7, President Obama announced a new initiative to increase access to solar power for all Americans. The effort will help states develop community solar programs, install 300 megawatts of renewable energy in federally subsidized housing, coordinate with various groups in 20 states to establish 260 projects, and provide training and opportunities for jobs in solar energy.

The sun's energy is unlimited, free and clean, and the amount that hits Earth in one hour is equal to the amount of energy used in one year by the entire planet. Yet, although installed global photovoltaic capacity increased almost nine-fold and the price of dropped by two-thirds between 2008 and 2013, only 1 percent of U.S. and global electricity generation come from solar energy, according to a new MIT report.

"For photovoltaics technology to become a major sustainable player in a competitive power generation market, it must provide abundant, affordable electricity, with environmental impacts dramatically lower than those from conventional power generation," according to Vasilis Fthenakis, a senior research scientist and professor of earth and environmental engineering at Columbia University, and the founder and director of the Center for Life Cycle Analysis.

Where does solar energy stand today, and where does it need to go in order for us to make the transition to renewable energy? Let's look at solar photovoltaic technology, since that provides most of the solar electric generation in the United States and the world today.

There are three generations of solar photovoltaic technology. The first generation is wafer-based crystalline silicon, a now mature technology used by 90 percent of installed solar capacity.

First generation solar panels typically comprise wired together and protected from the elements by glass and other materials. Solar cells are made of semiconducting (light absorbing) materials, such as crystalline silicon, which release electrons when they are hit by photons, units of sunlight. The electrons are forced to flow out as direct electrical current. Inverters then convert the direct current into alternating current, which is what the U.S. grid works on. The number of solar cells and the size of the solar panel array determine how much electricity can be generated.

Crystalline silicon wafer-based photovoltaic is non-toxic, abundant and reliable, but it does not have good ability to absorb light, so the silicon wafer must be thick, which contributes to its rigidity. These solar panels are complex to manufacture and relatively expensive; but crystalline silicon wafers' solar-to-electric power conversion efficiency rate has reached 25 percent, the highest for commercial applications.

In solar cells constructed of a single layer of semiconductor, all materials have the potential to reach 30 percent efficiency at best. This is because each type of semiconductor is activated by its own specific band gap, the amount of energy that it can absorb and convert into electricity. "If you have more energy than that, it's wasted as heat, and this reduces the efficiency of converting photons to electrons," explained Fthenakis. "…If the absorbed energy is lower than the material's energy band gap, you don't have any activation of electrons. So a third is wasted because it's too hot, a third of the energy is lower than what's required. … That leaves about 33 percent, some of which will be reflected back. That will take us down to 30 percent efficiency."

Photovoltaic configurations where multiple layers of different semiconductors (with different band gaps) are used in tandem, however, can reach efficiencies that go up to 65 percent because they can absorb a wider range of useful energy, but they are more costly.

Second generation photovoltaic technology consists of thin-film solar cells made mainly from cadmium telluride (CdTe) and copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS), both of which combinations involve rare and/or toxic metals. Thin-film cells are made by depositing one or more thin layers, or a thin film, of photovoltaic material, onto glass, plastic or metal. They absorb light 10 to 100 times more efficiently than silicon, so they only need to be a few microns thick (a human hair is 90 microns), and are thus flexible and light. Their efficiency is about 20 percent, but according to Fthenakis, they have the potential to achieve the same efficiency as first generation solar cells. They are used commercially, mounted on the ground and on roofs like silicon photovoltaic, with cadmium telluride the leading thin-film technology installed in the world today.

"Some people argue that solar needs to be improved in order to be deployed on a large-scale," said Fthenakis. "I think what we have now is good enough for the best areas (i.e. with plenty of sun). Now if we want solutions for, say, the north of Europe, then we need technologies that have higher efficiencies."

Where is solar power headed?
Organic solar cells could one day be an environmentally friendly source of energy on roofs, in computer screens and cell phones. Credit: BASF

Improving efficiency while keeping costs low are major goals of third generation photovoltaic research. Third generation technologies include thin-film solar photovoltaic employing dye-sensitized, organic, quantum dot or and novel combinations of semiconductor materials, as well as concentrators.

Dye sensitized solar cells are thin film solar cells composed of titanium dioxide nanoparticles covered with dye that absorbs sunlight. They are simple to make, use inexpensive materials and can work in low-light conditions; they have achieved 12.3 percent efficiency.

Organic photovoltaic cells (also called ) use small carbon-based molecules of abundant materials to absorb light. They can be made into thin film relatively cheaply with inkjet printing, and have achieved 11.1 percent efficiency.

Quantum dot photovoltaic uses nanocrystals made of semiconductor materials that take advantage of the laws of quantum mechanics. Because the size of the nanoparticles can be changed, they can be tuned to absorb energy from different parts of the solar spectrum, including parts of far infrared wavelengths, which constitute half of the sun's energy. Quantum dot photovoltaic has only reached 9.2 percent efficiency, but it is inexpensive to produce and can be sprayed or painted on.

Perovskite solar cells are characterized by a particular crystal structure. They are cheap and simple to manufacture and recently reached 20.1 percent efficiency, but have the potential to reach 31 percent, making them one of the most promising technologies to date.

Copper zinc tin sulfide solar cells have properties similar to copper indium gallium selenede (CIGS) for thin film, but use only abundant and non-toxic elements. They have reached 12 percent efficiency.

U.S. Army scientists recently patented a new thin-film cell that combines layers of silver and gold between semiconductor layers, but is only a few hundred nanometers thick (a human hair is about 80,000 nanometers thick). It is 1,000 times thinner than solar cells in existing solar panels, less expensive and more robust. Moreover the silver and gold enable the cell to absorb and convert more of the ultraviolet and infrared spectrum, and the cell's geometry allows it to absorb sunlight from any angle.

Using many relatively inexpensive lenses, concentrators focus sunlight onto a small solar cell; because the light is concentrated, it makes the cells much more efficient. Concentrators have reached 46 percent efficiency in lab tests. Since less solar-cell material is needed, concentrators have the potential to lower the cost of solar power. On the other hand, because some concentrators concentrate sunlight by a factor of 300 to 1,000 times onto a small cell, the use of more expensive solar cells combining multiple semiconductor materials to capture a broader range of wavelengths is possible. These types of concentrators that use multi-layer tandem cells are used for space and satellite applications where cost is not a factor, but on land are only used to keep costs down.

With the exception of concentrators, third generation photovoltaic technology is still in the lab stage, 10 to 20 years away from commercialization, said Fthenakis. Of technologies that are in commercial use today, thin film costs the least in terms of square meters and how much power it can deliver. The leading technology is cadmium telluride, because it's easier and faster to manufacture, and thus costs less.

Where is solar power headed?
A solar concentrator. Credit: John Isaac

"Thin films need to increase their efficiencies. And crystalline silicon needs to decrease its cost," said Fthenakis. "At some point there will be an overlapping there."

To expand the use of solar energy, installed costs must come down, technologies that can scale up cheaply need to be developed, and solar energy has to be smoothly integrated into the grid (which will involve enhanced ways to store the intermittent energy), says the MIT report. Photovoltaic system integration and storage optimization are key research topics in the Center for Life Cycle Analysis at Columbia. Elsewhere, ongoing research is focused on three key areas of photovoltaics: higher power conversion efficiency, use of more commonly found and abundant materials, and reduced manufacturing complexity and cost. According to the MIT report, "No single photovoltaic technology today excels in all three key technical characteristics."

Meanwhile, other exciting applications of solar energy are being developed as well.

The Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis created by the Department of Energy, is developing technology that replicates the natural photosynthesis of plants, converting sunlight, water and CO2 into oxygen and fuels made of carbohydrates or sugars. The artificial photosynthesis system, which is 10 times more efficient than natural photosynthesis, is called an artificial leaf or solar fuel generator. It uses nano-engineered, light absorbing compounds to convert sunlight into electrons; the electrical energy is then delivered to customized catalysts that convert water and CO2 into oxygen and chemical fuels. Specialized membranes allow the oxygen to escape and the fuel to be captured. A team from Harvard is building on the artificial leaf technology, using genetically modified bacteria to convert carbon dioxide plus hydrogen into the liquid fuel isopropanol, which can be used in engines similarly to ethanol.

On its journey around the world, the Solar Impulse, the first plane powered only by the sun, recently completed a 118-hour flight from Japan to Hawaii. The single-seater plane made of carbon fiber weighs a little over 5,000 lb. and has a 236-foot wingspan covered with 17,000 photovoltaic cells to power its electric motors and charge its lithium-ion batteries to run the plane at night. Its journey began in Abu Dhabi, with stops in Oman, India, Myanmar, China and Japan. From Hawaii, it will fly to Phoenix, New York and Europe, and return to Abu Dhabi.

Where is solar power headed?

In Sandpoint, Idaho, Scott Brusaw, an electrical engineer, is developing a solar roadway that involves a specially treated glass surface (to provide traction), with solar panels, a heating element and LED lights inside. The solar roadway can produce solar energy, keep roads warm enough so that snow doesn't collect, generate warnings and instructions to drivers with its LED lights, and potentially provide a charging infrastructure for electric vehicles. So far, Brusaw has created a demo parking lot made of 108 solar panels in Sagle, Idaho.

Meanwhile outside of Amsterdam in the Netherlands, a 230-foot bike path called the SolaRoad, embedded with solar cells, produced 3,000 kilowatt hours of electricity in its first six months; eventually it is hoped the electricity generated could power street and traffic lights, homes and electric cars. Researchers will be conducting tests over the next few years to determine how much energy it produces and how durable it is.

Where is solar power headed?
The Solaroad. Credit: Blueknight

In the United States, the solar tax credit of 30 percent on residential and commercial solar systems is set to expire at the end of 2016. Obama's proposed budget for 2016 asks Congress for a permanent extension of the solar tax credits. Hopefully they will be extended so that the expansion of can continue, since the key to widespread implementation of the technology is its cost in comparison to other energy sources.

"It's not fair to compare solar and wind with technologies that pollute," said Fthenakis. "We don't account for the societal costs of pollution from coal. … If we did, we'd see that electricity from coal is a lot more expensive than what we actually pay for it. This would make wind and solar much more appealing."

Explore further: Perovskite photovoltaic module reaches toward a record 11 percent conversion efficiency

Related Stories

Nanowires give 'solar fuel cell' efficiency a tenfold boost

July 17, 2015

A solar cell that produces fuel rather than electricity. Researchers at Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e) and FOM Foundation today present a very promising prototype of this in the journal Nature Communications. The ...

Towards more efficient solar cells

August 13, 2014

A layer of silicon nanocrystals and erbium ions may help solar cells to extract more energy from the ultraviolet (UV, high-energy) part of the solar spectrum. Experimental physicists from the FOM Foundation, the STW Technology ...

Recommended for you

Samsung to disable Note 7 phones in recall effort

December 9, 2016

Samsung announced Friday it would disable its Galaxy Note 7 smartphones in the US market to force remaining owners to stop using the devices, which were recalled for safety reasons.

Swiss unveil stratospheric solar plane

December 7, 2016

Just months after two Swiss pilots completed a historic round-the-world trip in a Sun-powered plane, another Swiss adventurer on Wednesday unveiled a solar plane aimed at reaching the stratosphere.

Solar panels repay their energy 'debt': study

December 6, 2016

The climate-friendly electricity generated by solar panels in the past 40 years has all but cancelled out the polluting energy used to produce them, a study said Tuesday.

16 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

gkam
2.5 / 5 (8) Jul 22, 2015
While all these advancements were being made, the "new" carbon sequestrating technologies are being shut down.
Edenlegaia
3.4 / 5 (5) Jul 22, 2015
While all these advancements were being made, the "new" carbon sequestrating technologies are being shut down.


They'll be. They're not for now. People, companies, countries are mostly waiting for more efficient way to gather solar energy. "Fortunately", some are purchasing the current generation solar panels, wind turbines and so on. They have a situation, spirit, wallet good enough to afford it.
We'll have to wait a little more till we can finally spread news of affordable way for common people to use renewable energies. If they think what they'll use will have a fine durability and strike down their electricity bill, it'll be all good.
RichManJoe
2.5 / 5 (4) Jul 22, 2015
Good discussion on conversion technologies, but converting solar power to electricity does not a solution make. You need to consider the entire system, including moving large amounts of energy around the grid, along with storing energy and shedding sinks for use when production is less than demand.
gkam
2.1 / 5 (7) Jul 22, 2015
Joe, nobody in the business thinks one can just replace one technology with another without integrating it intelligently.
RichManJoe
2.5 / 5 (2) Jul 22, 2015
gkam - Sometimes these news releases are picked up by people who are not in the business, and get distributed to others who have not a clue. All I am saying is: In my way of thinking, the title of the article "Where is solar power headed" implies a more complete discussion of the system, not just the collector. This gives a quite good summary of the collector technology, which I appreciate, and which, I think, would be an adequate discussion maybe twenty years ago (except some of the discussed technology did not exist then, and the collector cost has come down exponentially since then). But today, where we need to rapidly phase out carbon based generation, I don't think this is adequate. The much larger problems are integrating solar into the system. If they would have at least mentioned this, then maybe someone would have been inclined to do a little further research.

WillieWard
2 / 5 (4) Jul 22, 2015
"It's not fair to compare solar and wind with technologies that pollute"
But it is fair to compare solar and wind with carbon-free nuclear; aside myths, beliefs, conspiracy theories, junk sciences, sensationalist websites, and scare tactics; nuclear is far more ecologically friendly.
RichManJoe
1 / 5 (1) Jul 22, 2015
WillieWard - I would like to see a very fair, unbiased assessment of nuclear - I have reports and studies that go both ways, however, in all cases, I believe the authors have bias and get the answers they want.
Frosted Flake
5 / 5 (1) Jul 22, 2015
WillieWard asserts nuclear power is 'far more ecologically friendly' than ...something or other. I take issue.

Nuclear WOULD be more ecologically friendly IF we used a system designed to make electricity. But we don't. We use a system designed to make bombs. And that it can be used to make electricity does not make that a good idea. There have been many accidents. Some have been very serious. There will be many more. Because the system we use must be constantly kept under control to avoid disaster. It's like juggling chainsaws. And even if everything goes just the way we want, we still have million year nuclear waste to deal with. And no one knows how.

There is a far better nuclear power system available to us if we would SIMPLY use it. If you have 5 minutes, here is Kirk Sorensen.

youtube.com/watch?v=uK367T7h6ZY
Edenlegaia
3.4 / 5 (5) Jul 22, 2015
WillieWars - While i agree nuclear may give us a lot of power when and where we need it, and where renewable may not provide us such power yet, we should keep the option of developping better way to get good solar and wind energy production. Nuclear research must continue as well, but only to make sure we can build safer reactors, recycle and clean what we can't yet, reduce their size and cost....
Renewable technology will grow enough to be integrated everywhere. in our houses, cars, roads....
Nuclear reactors should, little by little, be dismantled until there's only few remaining, for tests, energy production and many other things we'll need for the future.
We still have a long way to go....
PPihkala
not rated yet Jul 22, 2015
I agree that uranium fuel nuclear reactors should be decommisioned when we can get energy from better sources like oxygen fuel nuclear. Solar Hydrogen Trends is developing a reactor that uses water as feedstock, running the reactor with electricity. COP is better than 100 and out comes hydrogen, which can be burned. More info at www.solarhydrogentrends.com
Returners
2.5 / 5 (4) Jul 22, 2015
I think the government should make huge wind and solar farms, and sell the energy to the end consumer. Cut out the CEO and other 0ver-payed individuals in the corporate model.

Governments are historically responsible for infrastructure. Energy is infrastructure.

Energy is also money; the true currency of nature.

The constitution says Congress has the point to mint/coin money. Therefore the constitution logically gives congress power over the energy infrastructure, since energy is the real currency of nature.

Why don't they uses this power?

With lower paid, appointees managing government owned energy businesses, that would mean lower prices to the consumer, and profits from the company would go directly to paying down government debt. This system would be dramatically more efficient than what we have today in terms of wealth management, energy distribution, and government oversight.
betterexists
3 / 5 (2) Jul 22, 2015
Just make clothes that trap solar energy; Then, toss the charged batteries from time to time into collecting stations for funds deposited into your account.
Edenlegaia
1 / 5 (2) Jul 23, 2015
What if those clothes rarely got out of the closet?
inorg_lsc
not rated yet Jul 26, 2015
http://www.clearv...om/news/
Solar energy is headed towards a somewhat non-conventional direction.
ab3a
4.2 / 5 (5) Jul 28, 2015
FTA: "It's not fair to compare solar and wind with technologies that pollute," said Fthenakis.

Nonsense. We should look at the whole lifecycle costs of each technology, pollution and all. It takes a lot of energy to make many solar cell technologies. It takes a lot of energy to build a windmill. It takes loads of energy to store the output of either of these technologies and it doesn't store them particularly efficiently either.

Furthermore, these things don't last forever. Most solar cells start to lose output after a few years of service. The useful life is rarely more than 25 years or so.

All of these technologies produce pollution, some more than others. They all require energy investments. They also have ideal scales of operation.

Saying that one shouldn't compare and contrast is the mark of a closed mind.
Lord_jag
3 / 5 (2) Aug 12, 2015
Who's storing solar energy?

It makes the most energy only when we need it the most.

So use it when it's made and stop firing up those diesel backup generators.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.