Affordability of batteries key to harnessing wind and solar power

March 7, 2011

Future batteries used by the energy grid to store power from the wind and sun must be reliable, durable and safe, but affordability is really the key to widespread deployment, according to a new report published online March 4 in the journal Chemical Reviews. The report is one of the most comprehensive reviews of electrochemical energy storage to date.

In the report, researchers from the Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory say that successful electrochemical storage, or EES, systems will need to evolve – in some cases, considerably – if they are going to compete financially with the cost of natural gas production. And besides technical improvements, the systems will need to be built to last, using materials that are safe and durable so that batteries could operate more than 15 years and require very little maintenance over their lifetime.

The report provides a comprehensive review of four stationary storage systems -- ones considered the most promising candidates for EES: vanadium redox flow, sodium-beta alumina membrane, lithium-ion and lead-carbon batteries. In their study, the PNNL researchers note the potential of each technology but, more importantly, explain what advances must occur with each if they're ultimately to be deployed.

Researchers say continuing to improve battery technology is critical to bringing down the cost and increasing the reliability of batteries.

"By improving EES technologies, industry could tap into a near endless supply of wind and solar power and drastically reduce the dependence on fossil fuels to meet growing demand for electricity," said Z. Gary Yang, PNNL laboratory fellow and lead author of the paper.

Yang says with further research, the cost of these battery technologies could be reduced, the performance improved and advances in materials, chemistries, design and system engineering occur.

Without advanced batteries, electricity from wind and solar power must be used the moment it's produced. The most commonly used battery systems today work by converting electricity to kinetic, or potential, energy and then discharging that energy back to the grid when it's needed. But these systems, such as flywheels and pumped hydro and compressed air systems, have limiting factors such as lack of portability.

Electrochemical energy storage systems, on the other hand, can efficiently store electricity in chemicals and then release it upon demand. The electrochemical energy storage systems work similar to a traditional household battery, but at a much larger scale, and use a variety of materials, like carbon, aluminum and even salt.

Like lead-acid batteries in a flashlight, batteries that store wind and solar power take in the electricity as it's produced and convert it to chemical energy, stored in the form of a liquid or solution. When the energy is needed from the battery, an electric charge starts the chemical conversion of energy back into electrons, which then move back into a power line on the electric grid.

The leaders of the battery "pack"

Vanadium redox flow battery

Vanadium redox flow battery is a type of rechargeable battery that stores electrical energy in two tanks of electrolytes, or fluids that conducts electricity. Researchers conducting the study say redox-flow technology could be a good candidate for backup energy storage for durations of up to 12 hours, and could integrate wind and solar power in a residential neighborhood or at several large industrial sites.

When energy is needed, the liquid is pumped from one tank to another. During this slow and steady process the chemical energy from the electrolyte is converted to electrical energy. When energy needs to be stored, the process is reversed. The amount of energy the battery can store is determined by the size of the tank and the amount of electrolyte it can hold. Researchers say this technology has potential if it can be made in a variety of sizes, portable and affordable.

Sodium-beta alumina membrane battery

The sodium-beta alumina membrane battery is typically built in a tubular design, and uses elements such as sulfur combined with sodium to reversibly charge and discharge electricity using sodium ions layered in aluminum oxide within the battery's core. Researchers say the battery shows potential to store lots of energy in a small space and that its high energy density and rapid rate of charge and discharge make it a candidate for powering electric vehicles and for other applications that require short, potent bursts of energy.

However, materials are expensive and there are safety concerns with the high operating temperature of the battery. PNNL researchers say modifying the shape of the battery can improve efficiency, lower the operating temperature and cost. In fact, PNNL and company EaglePicher Technologies, LLC of Joplin, Mo., are studying these improvements as part of DOE's Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy, or ARPA-E, program.

Lithium-ion battery

Lithium-ion, or Li-ion batteries are most commonly found in household gadgets and now electric vehicles. Li-ion batteries store electrical energy in various compounds, comprised of layers of different elements, such as lithium, manganese and cobalt. High energy and power capacity over other technologies has made Li-ion batteries the most promising option for transportation applications like electric vehicles.

Researchers say bringing down materials cost and improving safety could vastly improve Li-ion batteries and could help accelerate the penetration of electric vehicles, which themselves could serve as back-up storage on the grid.

In a traditional Li-ion battery cell, positively charged lithium ions migrate through a liquid electrolyte, while electrons flow through an external circuit, both moving back and forth from one side to the other. This movement creates and stores energy. Li-ion batteries have been a success for small, mobile electronics such as cell phones and laptop computers, but making them larger is difficult because they are expensive, prone to overheating and can lend themselves to electrical shorting. Scientists say while substantial progress has been made over past years to improve the technology, more work must be done to extend life, improve safety and reduce materials cost for the stationary applications.

Lead-carbon battery

Lead-carbon batteries are an evolving technology born from the traditional lead-acid battery, commonly used for traditional automobiles and back-up generators. Scientists have found by adding a bit of carbon to traditional lead-acid batteries they can significantly increase the lifespan of the battery. Researchers say lead-carbon batteries could serve as a viable back-up source for wind and because of their concentrated power.

During discharge in a traditional lead-acid battery, sulfuric acid reacts with the lead anode and cathode to create lead sulfate. The process reverses during charge. This conversion produces a short, powerful burst of energy, such as needed to jump start a vehicle. But over time, a lead-acid battery can lose its charge due to the gradual crystallization and buildup of lead sulfate within the battery's core. The corrosive acid also can eat away at a battery's core.

Adding carbon to the battery seems to minimize or prevent this crystallization from occurring, improving the cycle life and overall lifespan of the . Researchers say this technology has potential for storing renewable energy but that more field work is needed to understand the limitations – and to find ways to bring down the cost. The capital cost of the technology remains at $500 per-kilowatt hour and they believe it needs to be reduced to between $150-$200 per-kilowatt hour to be viable.

Explore further: Liquid Battery Offers Promising Solar Energy Storage Technique

More information: Zhenguo Yang, Jianlu Zhang, Michael Kintner-Meyer, Xiaochuan Lu, Daiwon Choi, John Lemmon, Jun Liu, Electrochemical Energy Storage for Green Grid, Month TK, 2011, Chem. Reviews,

Related Stories

New Hitachi Li-ion batteries to last ten years

April 9, 2010

( -- Hitachi has announced they may be able to double the life of rechargeable lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries through the development of a new cathode material. The material was developed in conjunction with the ...

Recommended for you

The ethics of robot love

November 25, 2015

There was to have been a conference in Malaysia last week called Love and Sex with Robots but it was cancelled. Malaysian police branded it "illegal" and "ridiculous". "There is nothing scientific about sex with robots," ...

Tandem solar cells are more efficient

November 23, 2015

Stacking two solar cells one over the other has advantages: Because the energy is "harvested" in two stages, and overall the sunlight can be converted to electricity more efficiently. Empa researchers have come up with a ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3 / 5 (2) Mar 07, 2011
This is why room temp superconductivity must be solved and more funding needs to be dedicated to such an endeavor. Superconducting magnetic energy storage devices already exist and can store an enormous amount of energy but the coil must be kept very cold to remain in the superconducting state.
3 / 5 (3) Mar 07, 2011
Superconductivity would be a very dangerous way to store energy, because it has the problem of releasing it all at once when containment is lost. Kinda like why flywheels are ultimately a bad idea, even though they sort-of work.

You wouldn't want one in your back yard.
1 / 5 (2) Mar 07, 2011
The Vanadium Redox Battery is clearly the safest and most effective option for grid-scale energy storage. The cost and supply of vanadium being the only outstanding deterrent. American Vanadium Corp (I am with AVC) has a large vanadium property in Nevada expected to start production as early as 2012. This mine will mean the sureness of supply and low pricing needed to allow America to go full steam ahead with VRB's in bringing renewable energy into the main stream. Please 'like' our Facebook page to stay on top of our story, or follow our Tweets @AVCVanadium , and get involved in our discussions. We want to hear from the scientific community. Let's work together to make vanadium batteries a reality.
1 / 5 (2) Mar 07, 2011
Anyone interested in advancing the vanadium redox battery design or implementation, please contact us at We are a resource company but intend to support R&D, education and lobbying government about vanadium battery solutions for renewables as well as electric vehicles.
not rated yet Mar 08, 2011
The description of the vanadium battery is a little off.

It consists of two tanks of electrolytes, and both are pumped in a separate loop against the two sides of a membrane that permits electron exchange though an external circuit between the electrolyte liquids, but won't allow them to mix.

This membrane setup resembles a fuel cell, and is quite expensive for small-scale setups, whereas the electrolyte liquid is relatively cheap. I've heard quotes of $300 per kWh for MWh-scale systems.

Of course, we desperately need it cheaper. One 1 MW windmill with a Cp of 0.25 and typical wind distribution will produce roughly 850 kW for 24 hours a week, and 150 kW at other times.

To smooth the output on a weekly basis, you would need about 18 MWh worth of batteries, which would cost roughly 5 million dollars at $300 per kWh, for just the one windmill. Ideally, we would want half a year worth of batteries to deal with the seasonal variations, so the costs stack up quite fast.
not rated yet Mar 08, 2011
To put those figures into contrast, consider that wind power costs about 1.2-2.6 million dollars per MW of capacity. Assuming an average price of 2 million dollars, and again a Cp of 0.25 for the average spot, and a service life of 25 years without failure, would mean 55 GWh of electricity produced at 3.7 cents a kWh. Comparable to that of nuclear energy, except for the fact that it's pretty much useless because of the random on/off habit of wind.

Adding 5 million dollars worth of batteries would increase the wholesale price to 12.7 cents per kWh, and that's not even a week's worth of backup, it's merely a "shock absorber" that would last only 1-3 days if the windmill don't turn at all.

(Mind, this is the price to the producer, the customer prices are much higher)
5 / 5 (1) Mar 08, 2011
future unobtanium will power it all, and its the critical key to makikng defunct technology work... its engineering 'accent' making all work just better with a sprinkle
not rated yet Mar 08, 2011
Superconducting Magnets for Grid-Scale Storage
not rated yet Mar 13, 2011
The world's largest battery is in Fairbanks, AK, and is NiCd. Google 'fairbanks battery'. But no mention here of molten http://en.wikiped...battery. Hi efficiency, inexpensive, long cycle life. But it has to be kept hot/molten, so bigger is better.
1 / 5 (1) Mar 13, 2011
Underground Chemical Batteries.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.