GE lost billions by 'misjudging' renewables: report

General electric has lost billions in market value since the 2015 Paris accord
General electric has lost billions in market value since the 2015 Paris accord

Investors in General Electric, once one of the world's most valuable companies, lost tens of billions of dollars after the Paris climate deal as it failed to adapt to the pace of the green energy transition, new analysis showed Thursday.

A report by the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) said GE had lost a "simply staggering" $193 billion (172 billion euros) in just three years to 2018—amounting to almost three quarters of its market capitalisation.

The Cleveland-based research group said GE and its principal shareholders misjudged the falling price of renewables as the world transitions to cleaner and suffered from a collapse of the gas turbine and thermal power construction markets.

"GE assumed wrongly that demand for and coal would continue to track global economic growth," they said, accusing GE of "an epic failure of corporate governance."

The 2015 Paris accord enjoins nations to work towards limiting global temperature rises to "well below" two degrees Celsius (3.6 Farenheit) and to a harder cap of 1.5C if possible.

To do so, governments must commit to curbing —the leading source of which is burning fossil fuels such as oil, gas and coal for power.

As the price of renewable energy technologies such as wind and solar fell in recent years, the IEEFA said GE has been left with billions in stranded fossil fuel-related assets as cheaper alternatives curbed industry demand for coal and gas.

The company also failed to account for increasing energy efficiency, driven largely by renewables, which decoupled energy demand from global economic activity, according to the report.

In particular GE's power division, which in 2016 equated to half of the company's pre-tax profit, continued to invest in gas turbine units even as global demand fell, the report said.

"The world is transitioning away from fossil fuels—particularly expensive imported thermal coal and gas—into low-cost, zero-pollution domestic renewables such as wind and solar," said Tom Sanzillo, IEEFA's director of finance.

"This is where the smart money is, but GE failed to pick the trend."

A global divestment movement is underway calling on pension and hedge funds, among others, to end investment in upstream fossil fuel projects. Hundreds of institutions in control of over $6 trillion in assets have joined the initiative.

When contacted by AFP, a spokeswoman referred to comments made by CEO Larry Culp to an energy conference last month, when he acknowledged there was "a lot of self-help required" to manage the company's assets.

"Some people would suggest that the gas business is dying (and) there are certainly structural challenges afoot," Culp said.

"We just don't think gas is going to zero in the near to medium term, right? So it really puts the onus on us to continue to innovate, continue to serve."


Explore further

Fuel subsidies defy green trend amid rising climate alarm

© 2019 AFP

Citation: GE lost billions by 'misjudging' renewables: report (2019, June 6) retrieved 16 September 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-06-ge-lost-billions-misjudging-renewables.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
90 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jun 06, 2019
Profit = subsidies/tax incentives
Without subsidies/tax incentives, solar and wind don't make sense for investors.
Intermittent renewables only exist to steal taxpayers' money(through subsidies/tax incentives) and to favor coal/oil/gas/fracking over Hydro and carbon-free nuclear energy, a crime in the face of Climate Change.
"In REAL life, 100% renewables = 80% natural gas & 20% renewables. No wonder natural gas is the fastest growing fuel worldwide."

"Solar and wind are good for four things: sucking up subsidies. Putting money on the pockets of solar/wind sellers. Raising the costs of electricity. Ensuring dependence on fossil fuels."

"...transitions to cleaner energy..."?
"Those that believe solar and wind energy are clean, should tour the mining / manufacturing / transportation / installation operations."

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more