Tricks to reduce DNA base editor's mistakes

Tricks to reduce DNA base editor’s mistakes
Figure 1: Principle of DNA base editors based on CRISPR. Cytosine base editors (CBE, top) induces C-to-T conversion, and the adenine base editors (ABE, bottom) causes A-to-G conversion. They consist of a guide RNA (green), a Cas9 nuclease (blue) and a base editor (pink), which unite to form a ribonucleoprotein complex. The guide RNA binds the target side on the DNA, while Cas9 cleaves the DNA strand (scissors), and the base editor modifies the desired DNA base, or letter. Credit: Institute for Basic Science

Researchers at the Center for Genome Engineering, within the Institute for Basic Science (IBS, South Korea) have identified the mistake rate of DNA editing tools known as adenine base editors, which are based on CRISPR. Assessing the genome-wide target specificity of these innovative techniques is essential to harness their applications in clinics and biotechnology. The findings were published in Nature Biotechnology.

DNA's four bases are the alphabet used by our cells: adenine (A) pairs with thymine (T), cytosine (C) with guanine (G), making a unique combination of 3.2 billion letters. Since some are caused by a mutation of just one letter, some of the applications of CRISPR, a powerful gene engineering tool, deal with the correction of this single-letter difference. Examples of proteins that can be added to the CRISPR system to promote letter conversions are cytosine base editors (CBEs) for C-to-T conversions, and adenine base editors (ABEs) for A-to-G changes. The IBS team has been interested in studying ABE specificity, as it has not been known so far.

The team, led by Jin-Soo Kim, studied the of recently developed ABE proteins, ABE7.10, in human cells. They pinpointed the positions on the human genome affected by ABE7.10 and scanned for errors beyond the target. To do that, they used an adapted version of Digenome-seq, a sequencing technique developed by the same Research Center that had already successfully determined the accuracy of CBE, CRISPR/Cas9 and CRISPR/Cpf1, among others.

They tested ABE7.10 with seven guide RNAs corresponding to seven DNA target letters, and also compared the results with a common CBE and a Cas9 nuclease. The modified Digenome-seq detected an average of 60 off-target mistakes across the entire human genome. And interestingly, although the three proteins were engineered to target the same site, they recognized different off-target points.

Tricks to reduce DNA base editor’s mistakes
Figure 2: Overview of the Digenome-seq workflow after ABE-mediated single letter substitution. ABE7.10 (light blue, with guide RNA represented as white filament) induces the conversion of adenine (A) to inosine (I) at the target DNA site. Since I is read as G during DNA replication, this leads to the conversion of A to G. In addition, the complex also causes a DNA cut in one strand. As the Digenome-seq technique works by detecting double-strand breaks, the researchers used a protein known as Endo V to produce a cut in the other DNA strand, nearby the I. At the end of the Digenome-seq procedure, shown in the circular Circos plot, it is possible to evaluate and count the on-target (red arrow) and off-target (black bars) positions. The same results were obtained with hAAG and Endo VIII, in place of Endo V, showing Digenome-seq reproducibility and reliability. Credit: Institute for Basic Science

IBS biologists also showed some strategies to curb the number of off-target modifications. Adding a couple of Gs at the end of the guide RNA reduced the off-target mistakes, as well as the use of a different type of Cas9 (Sniper-Cas9, developed by the same team in 2018) and the delivery of ABE7.10 via preassembled ribonucleoproteins, rather than via plasmids.

The team aims to contribute to the development of ABEs to introduce the desired single-letter changes in a more precise and efficient way. "As the accuracy of the base editor is proven, we expect that it will find wide application in the future in medical and agricultural realms," says Jin-Soo Kim.

Tricks to reduce DNA base editor’s mistakes
Figure 3: Improving ABE's specificity with preassembled ABE ribonucleoproteins, modified guide RNAs, and a different version of the DNA-cutting protein. Credit: Institute for Basic Science

Explore further

Accurate DNA misspelling correction method

More information: Daesik Kim et al. Genome-wide target specificity of CRISPR RNA-guided adenine base editors, Nature Biotechnology (2019). DOI: 10.1038/s41587-019-0050-1
Journal information: Nature Biotechnology

Citation: Tricks to reduce DNA base editor's mistakes (2019, March 5) retrieved 21 May 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more