United Airlines won't accept rechargeable battery shipments

Citing safety concerns, United Airlines on Monday became the second major U.S. airline to announce it will no longer accept bulk shipments of rechargeable batteries of the kind that power everything from smartphones to laptops to power tools.

Delta Air Lines quiet stopped accepting bulk shipments of the , also called , on Feb. 1. It's not uncommon for tens of thousands of the batteries to be shipped in a single cargo container aboard a passenger plane on an international flight.

Federal Aviation Administration tests over the past year show that when one overheats it can result in a chain reaction, causing other batteries to short-circuit and overheat. As they overheat, the batteries emit explosive gases that build up inside the cargo container. Several tests have resulted in fierce explosions that have blown the doors off containers, followed by violent fires.

The tests have placed passenger airlines in a quandary. The bulk shipments of batteries are permitted under both U.S. regulations and international aviation safety standards. They are also profitable. So far, there have been no cargo fires aboard passenger airlines attributed to .

But the batteries are believed by aviation officials in the U.S. and other nations to have either caused or contributed to fires that destroyed two Boeing 747 freighters in recent years, killing their pilots. The pilots of a third freighter managed to escape after landing in Philadelphia, but that plane was also destroyed.

The announcement by United to its cargo customers said the airline will stop accepting the shipments immediately.

"Our primary concerns when transporting dangerous goods are the safety of our customers, our customers' shipments and the environment," the airline said.

A third major U.S. carrier, American Airlines, stopped accepting some types of lithium-ion battery shipments on Feb. 23. But the airline is continuing to accept small packages of batteries grouped together or "overpacked" into a single cargo container. Those kinds of shipments are actually the larger safety concern because they result in very large quantities of batteries in one container.

All three airlines said they will continue to accept bulk shipments in which the batteries are packed inside or with equipment, such as laptops containing batteries or with batteries inside the same package. Placing batteries inside equipment or in packaging that creates additional buffering is believed to provide added protection, although safety officials say that theory hasn't been fully tested.

Explore further

Fiery risk? Air shipments of batteries questioned

© 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

Citation: United Airlines won't accept rechargeable battery shipments (2015, March 3) retrieved 16 July 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2015-03-airlines-wont-rechargeable-battery-shipments.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Mar 06, 2015
This is yet another sign of the way our society is drifting away from common-sense and towards hysteria. It seems like the right approach; "assume the worst, and avoid all hazards" but many pitfalls are created by this. First of all, there is no thinking involved. Safety requires thoughtful risk-assessment, but this is being cast aside in favor of the non-thinking, avoidance approach.

What's the harm? Plenty. The number of excessive-force incidents with police has increased exponentially in recent years? It's not just bad luck; police are trained nowadays not to think, just to assume the worst, and err on the side of over-kill, going into a conflict situation with excessive-force instead of trying to diffuse it with common-sense. The resulting death-toll mounts.

It's a similar situation with potentially hazardous good or substances. Instead of doing a proper risk-assessment, the current protocol is to ban things based on their name alone, a hysterical approach.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more