Observation of unexpectedly deformed neutron-rich magnesium nuclei prompts rethink of nuclear shell structure

Nuclear islands of deformation
Figure 1: The shape of neutron-rich magnesium nuclei challenges the assumption that ‘magic numbers’ are the same for all nuclei. Credit: carloscastilla/iStock/Thinkstock

Although much is known about atoms and their nuclei, scientists continue to make surprising discoveries as they probe the properties of some of the more exotic isotopes. Pieter Doornenbal from the RIKEN Nishina Center for Accelerator-Based Science (RNC) and co‐workers have made another such discovery with the observation that magnesium nuclei with a large number of neutrons appear to lose the nuclear shell structure that has become fundamental to our understanding of the nucleus.

The protons and that make up an atomic nucleus are kept together by a balance of nuclear forces. When the number of neutrons is similar to the number of protons, the nucleus is generally stable and the nucleons arrange themselves in shells as a consequence of the laws of quantum mechanics.

Nuclear physicists now widely accept that nuclei with 2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82 or 126 neutrons or protons are particularly stable due to the complete filling of these shells. Nuclei with such '' of protons or neutrons are spherical, whereas nuclei with numbers of nucleons that diverge from these magic values are increasingly deformed.

Doornenbal and his colleagues investigated the shape of nuclei with 22, 24 or 26 neutrons—a significant imbalance of neutrons against magnesium's 12 protons. "Studying such nuclei is now possible thanks to the RNC's Radioactive Isotope Beam Factory, which provides the world's highest-intensity radioactive isotope beams," says Doornenbal. The results indicate that the magic numbers for neutron-rich nuclei—and hence the filling of nuclear shells—might differ from those of the naturally occurring , in which the numbers of and neutrons are roughly equal.

The beams of magnesium nuclei were produced by first bombarding a high-energy beam of calcium nuclei against a thin beryllium target. The collision created a multitude of different nuclei that were then screened using magnetic fields to select precursor nuclei—aluminum-37, aluminum-39 and silicon-40. The desired magnesium nuclei were then obtained by bombarding the precursor nuclei against a carbon target to knock out additional nucleons.

The researchers probed the shape of the magnesium nuclei by measuring the high-energy electromagnetic waves that they emit. By comparing these results to theoretical calculations and previous experimental work, the team inferred a large 'island' of deformation in the isotope chart for neutron-rich nuclei with 20 to 28 neutrons. "This behavior is also expected to occur for larger magic numbers," says Doornenbal. "However, we do not yet have the experimental tools to study it in these regions."

Explore further

'Magic numbers' disappear and expand area of nuclear deformation

More information: Doornenbal, P., Scheit, H., Takeuchi, S., Aoi, N., Li, K., Matsushita, M., Steppenbeck, D., Wang, H., Baba, H., Crawford, H. et al. In-beam γ-ray spectroscopy of 34,36,38Mg: Merging the N = 20 and N = 28 shell quenching. Physical Review Letters 111, 212502 (2013). dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.212502
Journal information: Physical Review Letters

Provided by RIKEN
Citation: Observation of unexpectedly deformed neutron-rich magnesium nuclei prompts rethink of nuclear shell structure (2014, January 10) retrieved 21 October 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2014-01-unexpectedly-deformed-neutron-rich-magnesium-nuclei.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jan 10, 2014
Given the expense of synthesizing un-natural isotopes, even if you could find one of these with stable characteristics, it probably doesn't have a cost-effective practical use. Only thing I though of so far was potentially making better radiation shielding.

Medical radiation is out of the question because of the insane costs of synthesize these materials.

This might be relevant in transitional layers of neutron stars, between the pure neutron core and the heavy element crust, which isn't dense enough and deep enough in the gravity field to fully collapse to pure neutrons.

To me, it would seem useful if you could figure out ways to remove neutrons from useful materials, while remaining stable, so that you could make much lighter construction materials.

For example, if you could somehow make Iron stable with fewer neutrons, then it's mass decreases while it's strength theoretically stays the same, allowing for bigger, stronger buildings and bridges (theoretically).

Any other ideas?

Jan 10, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Jan 10, 2014
@Returners, the article is about trying to better understand Nuclear Shell Structure, not the synthesis of isotopes for a practical application.

As for making things stronger, we just need to work out better synthesis of pure carbon materials.

Jan 11, 2014
So not everything is known about the atom?
Cold Fusion.

Jan 11, 2014
Egleton wrote, "So not everything is known about the atom? Cold Fusion."

In the theory of logic, this is known as a 'non sequitur.'

It's fun! Anyone can play! Let's do another one.

"So Obama wants to expand Social Security?


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more