Battery Research Aims To Store Renewable Energy

Nov 19, 2009 By Devin Powell and Philip F. Schewe, ISNS
A battery storage facility on Long Island helps to provide power for an MTA bus depot. Credit: New York Power Authority

The biggest chemical battery in the United States is located near Interstate 90 in the small town of Luverne, Minn. The 80 ton device -- the size of two tractor-trailers stacked on top of each other -- stores as much energy as about 3 million rechargeable AA batteries and can power about 3,000 houses for more than an hour when discharging at its maximum rate.

The battery, purchased by utility company Xcel, draws its power from energy generated by a local wind farm. As it charges and discharges, the helps to regulate the power production fluctuations of the that feed energy onto the electrical grid.

The battery is also intended to soak up extra energy at night, when the wind blows strongest and when the power demand from the grid is the lowest. This energy can then be released in the afternoon to lessen the strain on the electrical grid when people return home from work.

"We believe that will allow more wind resources and more renewable sources of power to come on to the system," said Frank Novachek, director of corporate planning for Xcel.

The Department of Energy agrees that massive energy storage will be important, announcing on Oct. 26 the first round of stimulus funds allocated for the development of new high-risk energy technologies. A relatively new DOE agency, the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy -- created in 2007 in the image of the Department of Defense's DARPA -- is giving out almost $20 million for the development of new battery chemistries for large-scale storage. These cutting-edge ideas for improved batteries include nanotubes capable of releasing huge amounts of energy in a short amount of time and batteries consisting entirely of liquid metals and molten salt.

Why Size Matters

"Most of the batteries we have in the world were made for small-scale usage," said George Crabtree director of the material science division of Argonne National Laboratory. "You don't need much energy to start your car, and your car battery is going to recharge again as soon as the car starts."

But according to a 2008 report by the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, large-scale batteries need to be developed to deal with the increasing amounts of renewable energy on the grid. The AIChE report warned that no proven technologies have been developed to store large quantities of solar and wind energy.

These renewable sources of energy are not as constant as traditional sources like coal and nuclear power -- winds change speed frequently, the sun does not shine at night, and, as a result, energy must be captured and stored so it can be used when needed. Large-scale, high capacity batteries can allow power companies to constantly adjust and balance the amount of power flowing into the grid to match customer's ever-changing demands.

Coal and nuclear power companies match supply to demand by keeping about 13 percent of the total power supply in reserve. When more power is needed, they can bring more generators online or tap into the reserve.

Because renewable energy sources still make up only a small fraction of the nation's total energy supply -- about 2.4 percent as of 2006 -- their power fluctuations are still manageable. But 26 states have established standards to massively increase the amount of renewable energy. New York state hopes to produce 24 percent of its energy portfolio from renewable sources by 2013; California is shooting for 33 percent by 2020, and Hawaii hopes to achieve 40 percent by 2030.

"Without [massive energy storage], renewable power can only be piggybacked onto the U.S. grid to supply not more than 15 percent of the power at best," concluded the 2008 AIChE report.

Some of the power and storage needs can be provided by technologies other than chemical batteries.

The Tennessee Valley Authority has been using the 1,600 foot Raccoon Mountain to store energy since the 1970s. When the demand for electricity is low, surplus power is used to pump water from a low-lying reservoir to another reservoir at the top of the mountain. When the demand for energy is high and electricity production expenses increase, the water in the upper reservoir is released, and gravity pulls it down a tunnel in the center of the mountain to spin turbines connected to the hydro-electric generator below. The technology is efficient, but additional development of new plants is hampered by environmental concerns and by the lack of suitable mountains in convenient places.

In Alabama, PowerSouth has set up a different kind of storage system that also makes use of natural topography to store energy. The Compressed Air Energy Storage facility in McIntosh forces air into a sealed underground salt cavern the size of an 80 story building. The air can be released and heated to rotate generators and produce electricity. A major limitation of this technology is that it needs to be built in an area containing specific geological formations that will not leak.

Flywheels that spin 15,000 times a minute, developed by Beacon Power in Massachusetts, provide another way of regulating the flow of power. On Nov. 23, construction will begin on a 20-megawatt facility that stores and dispenses power using the mechanical energy of spinning wheels set into motion by a extra electricity. Unlike the large batteries, the wheels cannot hold energy for a long period of time because friction slows them down, but they work well for smoothing out power fluctuations.

Sale on batteries

Chemical batteries do not rely on features of the local landscape and offer longer-term energy storage, making them an attractive option for use as energy storage repositories in the future. Efforts are underway to develop new battery chemistries that range from creating advanced version of lead batteries to improving the capabilities of the lithium-ion batteries that currently power laptops and hybrid cars.

Today's biggest batteries -- including the one in Minnesota and a device intended for emergency power in Texas by the utility company American Electric Power -- are made by the Japanese ceramics company NGK Insulators. Incentives for renewable power offered by the island nation have led to the installation of NGK's largest battery, more than five times bigger than the Minnesota battery.

The chemistry inside these sodium-sulfur batteries is similar to that of the lead acid battery inside of a car. In the car battery, a chemical reaction provides power by sending electrons from one lead plate to another through a liquid called an electrolyte. NGK batteries replace the lead plates with molten sulfur and molten salt and the liquid electrolyte with a solid piece of ceramic that allows electrons to flow between the two hot liquids.

This gives the batteries a much longer lifetime than car battery chemistry would allow. NGK guarantees them for 15 years (4,500 charge and discharge cycles), during which their efficiency at absorbing and discharging energy drops from about 92 to 75 percent.

But experts agree that sodium-sulfur batteries are still too expensive to affordably achieve the gigawatts of energy storage that will be needed to reach state goals.

"The first thing we need to do is to lower the price of battery systems," said Imre Gyuk, manager for the DOE Energy Storage Research Program. "We also need to increase the cycle life of these systems and improve their reliability."

ARPA-E's new awards are focused on price-cutting technologies in early stages of development.

Battery manufacturer EaglePicher, working in partnership with the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, received $7.2 million to modify the sodium sulfur batteries. The researchers are hoping to lower the operating temperature and slow down the corrosion that limits battery life by thinning the ceramic plate that separates the components inside.

"PNL has already made prototype separators that reduce the operating temperature by 100 degrees Celsius [180 degrees Fahrenheit]," said Robert Higgins, director of new technology at Eagle Picher. "[The battery] will have a longer lifetime and a much lower cost."

Dan Sadoway of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, Mass., received about $7 million on the strength of a prototype battery the size of an ink bottle that works in an entirely different way. His all-liquid device eschews expensive materials in favor of cheap metals like magnesium and antimony. The design operates around 1,300 degrees Fahrenheit, sandwiching a layer of molten salt between two layers of liquid metals.

Another ARPA-E award went to the FastCAP Systems Corporation, also located in Cambridge, Mass., which designs capacitors -- devices that store less energy than batteries but are able to release that energy much faster. FastCAP is working on increasing the surface area of capacitors to create ultracapacitors that could contain more electrical charge and store more energy. Their goal is to produce a device with the same energy density and energy storage capacities as batteries that would be capable of releasing 20 times more effectively. An additional advantage of capacitor technology over battery technology is in their use of materials that are less toxic and available domestically.

"With ARPA-E, we are swinging from the heels and trying to hit home runs, not just base hits," Secretary Steven Chu said. "This is high-risk, high reward research: if even one or two of these ideas become transformative technologies -- the next transistor or another Green Revolution -- this will be among the best investments we've ever made."

© 2009 Inside Science News Service

ISNS


Explore further: Japan gov't calls on citizens to stockpile toilet paper

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

More safety for cell phone batteries

Apr 10, 2008

Fraunhofer researchers will be presenting a novel lithium-ion battery at Hannover Messe on April 21 - 25. It is based on a polymer electrolyte, which is – unlike the liquid electrolyte in conventional lithium-ion batteries ...

Nanotech Batteries for a New Energy Future

Mar 19, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- In order to save money and energy, many people are purchasing hybrid electric cars or installing solar panels on the roofs of their homes. But both have a problem -- the technology to store ...

Tilting at wind farms

Jan 07, 2009

A way to make wind power smoother and more efficient that exploits the inertia of a wind turbine rotor could help solve the problem of wind speed variation, according to research published in the International Journal of ...

Recommended for you

Seoul to provide smartphone-charging down by the stream

19 hours ago

Seoul's mobile users will be able to make use of outdoor charging stations at a popular downtown stream, powered by mini-hydroelectric turbines that use the stream's current. The city is building the recharging ...

Tesla, Chinese firm plan 400 charging stations

20 hours ago

Tesla Motors Co. and a state-owned Chinese phone carrier announced plans Friday to build 400 charging stations for electric cars in a new bid to promote popular adoption of the technology in China.

Cool roofs in China can save energy and reduce emissions

Aug 28, 2014

(Phys.org) —Working with Chinese researchers, the Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) has conducted the first comprehensive study of cool roofs in China and concluded ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

jerryd
2 / 5 (1) Nov 19, 2009

Great article until it came to the ultracap hype. These will never match batteries as they are 100x's as expensive, weigh many, times more per unit of energy. As for peak power, 5000amps of battery costs 100's of time less from batteries than ultracap and the battery can do it for an hour. Vs an ultracap that can do it seconds for the same cost. You don't have to believe me, do their numbers energy stored/weight/cost.

Next most Lithium batteries are not toxic. Nor are their materials rare, but very plentiful. US has all the 'Rare Earth' that are not rare or Lithium we will need for decades, the recycling will kick in.

They don't mention the large battery resource in the near future. EV batteries can drive power back into the grid for cash or energy. It would be worth it many times to charge your EV for free so it can use it to store power at night and use it as needed during the day, leaving it full before you need to drive home. And solve grid storage problem.
rgw
4 / 5 (1) Nov 19, 2009
Another 'genius' stuck in the 'nothing new can be invented' syndrome
fuzz54
4 / 5 (1) Nov 19, 2009
I don't think it's a case of 'nothing new can be invented'. It's more that we found a very obvious solution to this problem years ago. It's very hard to beat chemical reactions as the primary mechanism behind batteries. It can be done, but a paradigm shift in battery technology is much harder to come by than in other areas of science. It will happen eventually. Once it starts hitting our wallets hard enough a solution will be found.
elgin
1 / 5 (1) Nov 19, 2009
If the current battery weighs 80 tons and serves 3000 homes, the battery weight per home served is 53.3 lbs. That's about equal to a large car battery. It might make a lot more sense to place batteries in individual homes rather than have them centrally located. (We are told that the big battery can serve 3000 homes for 1 hour but that may not be the capacity needed per home if we do switch to 15% unreliable green power.)

The benefit of distributed storage is that your grid capacity can be smaller (15%) and thus cheaper if charging is done in off peak hours. (That's the scheme, right?) Control of the battery charge / discharge timing could still be centrally controlled. (We're all going to be on smart meters, right?)

In Texas, wind power is harvested 300 miles west of population centers and the idiots built more generating capacity than the grid can carry to consumers in the east. This problem requires $7 billion worth of new grid wires or storage. I wonder how much storage costs?
david_42
not rated yet Nov 20, 2009
Sodium/sulfur do not scale down well. They involve large tanks of molten materials, which means heavy insulation requirements. Down-sizing is subject to a square-cube ratio and your heat losses per volume rise rapidly.
AgentG
not rated yet Nov 25, 2009
Any aqueous flow battery operating at ambient temperature will have massive advantages over high-temperature molten salt or molten metal chemistries. It is so clear that the thermal and engineering requirements are simply too complex to be economically feasible.