Do energy-efficient LED lights cause unexpected ecological damage?

March 28, 2016 by Alexandra (Sasha) Wright, Plos Blogs
New LED streetlights in the city of Houston, Texas. Credit: meltedpastic

Planet earth runs on light energy. Light energy from the sun powers photosynthetic processes in plants and different wavelengths of light cue these plants to flower, move their leaves, and grow taller. These same cues influence animals as well. Insects are attracted to narrow range UV lights, based on the evolved sensitivities to UV light in their eyes. Some birds are adapted to only sing mating calls at night based on the light quality from a full moon. High light levels can increase the mating behaviors of some frogs and changes in the quality of light can affect bird nesting behaviors. With so much of the natural world dictated by fine-tuned associations with light quantity and quality, how does the constant light pollution of cities affect the behavior of these organisms? Can different types of light pollution (street lights, billboards, or cars) affect ecological interactions in different ways? And can we design cities to interfere less with these naturally evolved relationships?

Work published this week in PLoS One explores the differences between different types of light bulbs (newer LED vs. older low-pressure sodium) on the behavior of suburban bat populations.

Many cities worldwide have begun to shift towards LED in streetlights due to improved color rendering (broader spectrum light quality) and increased energy efficiency over time. In fact, the United States Department of Energy reports that residential LED's can reduce energy use by 75 percent and last 25 times longer than traditional incandescent lighting. In places like New York City, these changes are projected to result in up to $14 million annually (energy savings and maintenance) and are a huge step towards to city's goal of reducing carbon emissions 30 percent by 2030.

However, changes in light quality and quantity resulting from widespread changes in streetlight bulbs will almost certainly affect urban populations of plants and animals as well – but maybe not the bats?

This week, Rowse et al. (2015) demonstrated that bat populations in suburban areas of the UK were unaffected by a switch from low-pressure sodium (LPS) bulbs to higher efficiency LED bulbs.

Credit: Rowse et al. 2016

The authors studied bat behavior (bat calls and feeding behavior) before and after streetlight replacements with LED bulbs. Bats are usually attracted to these streetlights due to some combination of (1) the high abundance of food (insects) attracted to these light environments and (2) the ability of some bats, such as vesper bats, to see the UV light emitted from some types of bulbs (e.g. metal halide). The authors suggest that in this comparison between LPS and LED bulbs there is little change in light quantity in the UV range. LPS emits light in a much narrower range, but the cool LED's used in the studied municipalities do not emit in the UV range at all, and the neutral LED's emit at a very low level. This may mean that in our design of more sustainable cities, the switch to LED's may be a reasonable choice for both energy efficiency and bat behavior.

But the story likely isn't quite that simple – particularly for the insect populations that drive many of these patterns.

Past work in New Zealand indicated that a switch to LED lights can increase insect attraction to artificial lights by as much as 48 percent when compared to high-pressure sodium (HPS).

Common Pipistrelle bat. Credit: BioBlitz Bristol

Conversely, the authors point to a study in Germany showing increased attraction to HPS over LED lighting. These discrepancies may be due to differences in context: the New Zealand study was conducted in rural habitat while the German study was done in the city of Dusseldorf. The picture isn't yet clear.

The design of more ecologically sustainable cities has become a major topic of conversation in recent years. Understanding how a shift in light quantity and quality will affect current plant and animal populations is an essential piece of the puzzle. Importantly, ecological interactions in urban environments are starting in a disturbed state.

It may be tempting to ask: Why aren't we designing lighting solutions that more closely mimic "natural" non-urban environments? In the case of cities, this may be impossible.

attraction to street lamps in Tudela, Spain. Credit: Oiluj Samall Zeid

Natural conditions would be low to no , and this isn't feasible when we are simultaneously trying to manage for human safety and function.

In the design of the question probably has to be: How do we design lighting solutions that reduce rapid changes from the status of the past several decades? This will mean that we aren't suddenly applying a new environmental filter that affects plants and animals in entirely new and different ways. At the very least this should reduce environmental variability, and will likely lead to more ecological stability over time.

Explore further: Building a better light bulb

More information: Elizabeth G. Rowse et al. The Switch from Low-Pressure Sodium to Light Emitting Diodes Does Not Affect Bat Activity at Street Lights, PLOS ONE (2016). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150884

S. M. Pawson et al. LED lighting increases the ecological impact of light pollution irrespective of color temperature, Ecological Applications (2014). DOI: 10.1890/14-0468.1

Related Stories

Building a better light bulb

February 1, 2012

Scientists study the movement of charge carriers to design an organic LED that is energy efficient and still casts a warm, natural glow.

Recommended for you

Sponge creates steam using ambient sunlight

August 22, 2016

How do you boil water? Eschewing the traditional kettle and flame, MIT engineers have invented a bubble-wrapped, sponge-like device that soaks up natural sunlight and heats water to boiling temperatures, generating steam ...

4 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

LED Guy
5 / 5 (3) Mar 28, 2016
LPS hardly represents a natural light source and it does in fact have some UV content.

I am a bit surprised that the option for warm white LED based streetlights wasn't mentioned. There is a trend for lower CCT streetlights.

BTW: the "neutral" spectrum has approximately the same visual appearance (to humans) as moonlight.

As a final point, LED based streetlights are much better at directing light onto the streets and sidewalks (and not at houses and the sky), so in one sense they are much better than LPS, HPS and HID based lights.
gkam
2 / 5 (8) Mar 28, 2016
PG&E hired arborists and other specialists in the 1980's to study whether trees which get illuminated all night with streetlights and all day with daylight suffer any effects. None were found.

Back then, we still had many Mercury vapor and both kinds of Sodium Vapor, but not much of the whiter metal halide.

BTW, it is the design of the fixture which determines how much light is spilled out of the intended area.
Lex Talonis
3.7 / 5 (3) Mar 29, 2016
You can tell that Sasha Wright is an idiot.

If the article is about examining the evidence then the heading should be about the results, not an open ended question.

"Do energy-efficient LED lights cause unexpected ecological damage?
March 28, 2016 by Alexandra (Sasha) Wright, Plos Blogs"

"Well I don't know, do they? - your the fucking researcher."
antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (1) Mar 29, 2016
will almost certainly affect urban populations of plants and animals as well

OK...but the urban population of plants and animals is rather low. because the only solution to
How do we design lighting solutions that reduce rapid changes from the status of the past several decades?
is: Don't build cities (which doesn't seem to be a realistic option for the foreseeable future)

With regard to the behavior of bats: The presence of artificial lights are an unnatural light source whether they are LED or any other type. Bats are capable of hunting in the dark. Any attractive force to insects by our light sources is just a bonus to them. If LEDs are less attractive, then that still leaves the natural ability of the bat. If it's more attractive then bats get a free lunch.
Either way I see no reason to take this into consideration when designing lights.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.