Germany reassured "for now" over Belgian nuclear plants

February 1, 2016
Germany's Environment Minister Barbara Hendricks (R), seen with Belgium's Interior Minister Jan Jambon in Brussels on February 1
Germany's Environment Minister Barbara Hendricks (R), seen with Belgium's Interior Minister Jan Jambon in Brussels on February 1, 2016, is the latest European minister to hold talks about the ageing Doel and Tihange nuclear power plants

Germany's environment minister Barbara Hendricks said Monday she was reassured for the moment over the safety of Belgian nuclear power plants that have also worried the Netherlands and Luxembourg.

Hendricks was the latest European minister to hold talks with Belgian officials following similar meetings last month involving Luxembourg and the Netherlands about the ageing Doel and Tihange .

"For now I am reassured. We will see," Hendricks said after talks with Belgian Interior Minister Jan Jambon.

"Belgium has assured us that experts will respond to the catalogue of questions from the German government in February," she added.

In March, she said, the two sides will hold an ad hoc working group of experts.

Jambon said each side would visit the other's plants to conduct inspections.

The concerns have largely emerged since the Belgian government's decision in December to extend the lives of 40-year-old reactors Doel 1 and Doel 2 until 2025 under a deal to preserve jobs and invest in the transition to cleaner energy.

It had originally shuttered Doel 1, the country's oldest reactor, in February 2015, but just three days after it was restarted in December it had to be closed due to a generator problem. It has now been restarted for a second time.

Tiny cracks discovered in 2012 in the reactor pressure vessels of Doel 3 and Tihange 2 also caused lengthy closures of those two reactors. They were both restarted at the end of last year, one having to close quickly again, for a few days, after a water leak.

And the Doel 4 reactor was also shut down urgently in August 2014 after a leak in the turbine hall, caused by tampering, gushed out 65,000 litres of oil lubricant. The investigation continues.

By 6:00 pm (1700 GMT), there were more than 770,000 signatures on a petition circulated by the activist group Avaaz, calling for a cross-border environmental impact study of all the Belgian nuclear reactors. The plants should be closed pending the conclusions of the study, Avaaz said.

Explore further: Belgian nuclear reactor restarts after shutdown

Related Stories

Belgian nuclear reactor restarts after shutdown

January 4, 2016

Belgium on Monday restarted a reactor that was shut down at the weekend just three days after returning to service amid concern in neighbouring countries over its nuclear safety.

Belgium restarts ageing Tihange 1 nuclear reactor

December 27, 2015

Belgian power utility Electrabel said Saturday it had restarted a nuclear reactor at its ageing Tihange plant, just days after being forced to shut it down following a fire in the electricity supply system.

Recommended for you

Samsung to disable Note 7 phones in recall effort

December 9, 2016

Samsung announced Friday it would disable its Galaxy Note 7 smartphones in the US market to force remaining owners to stop using the devices, which were recalled for safety reasons.

Swiss unveil stratospheric solar plane

December 7, 2016

Just months after two Swiss pilots completed a historic round-the-world trip in a Sun-powered plane, another Swiss adventurer on Wednesday unveiled a solar plane aimed at reaching the stratosphere.

Solar panels repay their energy 'debt': study

December 6, 2016

The climate-friendly electricity generated by solar panels in the past 40 years has all but cancelled out the polluting energy used to produce them, a study said Tuesday.

5 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Lord_jag
3.6 / 5 (7) Feb 01, 2016
What are all these closures costing?

Repairing cracks, buying tens of thousands of liters of nuclear grade oil and leaks galore. Even if you completely ignore the potential for catastrophic failure, what is the actual and real cost of constantly repairing and fueling these units?
Vietvet
3 / 5 (6) Feb 01, 2016
Meanwhile in Germany--

"Radioactive waste dogs Germany despite abandoning nuclear power"
https://www.newsc...BAL-hoot
WillieWard
3 / 5 (4) Feb 02, 2016
Meanwhile in Germany--
coal: 77 deaths/TWh
nuclear: 0.074 deaths/TWh
"Coal has even higher emissions of radioactive material compared to nuclear power."
http://anglesonen...om/?p=63
http://www.nytime...use.html
http://carboncoun...burning/
http://judithcurr...misstep/
German Energiewende = Green Hypocrisy
Lord_jag
3.4 / 5 (5) Feb 02, 2016
Willie,
Tell me more about the non-dispatchable nuclear power that's repeatedly down for months due to health concerns.
WillieWard
3 / 5 (4) Feb 02, 2016
Tell me more about...
"US nuclear power reactors operated at record 91.9% capacity in 2015" while solar in Germany in 2014 less than 11%.
http://www.platts...21796809
"91.9% capacity" a really dispatchable reliable carbon-free power, even with political/ideological interests against it.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.