Diamagnetic levitation of pyrolitic graphite over a single magnet achieved

Aug 28, 2014
Three pieces of pyrolytic graphite are levitated freely over a single multipole NdFeB magnet

Diamagnetic levitation of pyrolitic graphite over a single magnet has been achieved, using commercially available magnetic field domain printing technology. Using this approach, levitation applications, including bearings and sensors, could be realised without the use of complex magnet arrays.

Intrinsic reaction

In diamagnetism, a material creates a repelling in reaction to an applied magnetic field. The strength of the effect is highly material-dependent; in diamagnetic materials it is the dominant form of magnetism and can be strong enough to allow of some materials, including water, bismuth and graphite.

The repelling magnetic field, produced by a modification of the orbits of the electrons in the diamagnetic material, allows levitation that does not need energy input, nor feedback control, and so is of interest for applications including bearings and MEMS sensor systems. Recent research has included its use in a levitated flywheel battery and nanoforce sensors.

Typically, an array of magnets arranged in a chessboard pattern of alternating magnetisation directions is used to achieve stable diamagnetic levitation. This pattern creates the necessary strong magnetic field and field gradient. Such arrays take time to assemble and the brittle NdFeB magnets often used can be damaged in the assembly process. Before assembly, each magnet needs to be machined, magnetised and coated individually, making array manufacture time-consuming and costly.

Printed patterns

Magnetic field domain pattern of a printed multiple NdFeB magnet, revealed by magnetic field viewing film

In this issue of Electronics Letters, Gerald Küstler, an independent researcher based in Germany, reports the use of an existing, commercially available magnet production technology to eliminate the need for a magnet array in diamagnetic levitation.

"I recognised that magnets with printed magnetic field domains can be used to realise diamagnetic levitation over a single magnet," explains Küstler. "The technology of printing magnetic field domains was just recently developed by Correlated Magnets Research LLC. Their aim is to provide magnets with very specific and improved properties and behaviour. However, as far as I know, diamagnetic levitation applications were never in their focus."

Normal magnetisation technologies use a set of magnetisation coils arranged to achieve a single specific magnetisation pattern. This allows simple magnetisation patterns like linear or radial opposite patterns to be made, for example, the alternating parallel rows of magnetisation of a fridge magnet.

More complex patterns with undisturbed closed loops, such as an opposite, nested ring pattern, can't be made this way, as there must always be an access for the current feeding wires at one point of the loop. Building a custom magnetisation coil for a new specific field pattern also means a significant investment of money and time.

The process adopted by Correlated Magnetics Research LLC uses an impulse magnetiser and a linear stage which moves a small magnetisation coil above the surface of the magnet to be magnetised. In this way, the necessary, detailed, magnetic field domain pattern can be built up step by step.

Using this technology, Küstler was able to obtain the necessary pattern to achieve diamagnetic levitation using a single magnet, eliminating the costs and complexities of array manufacture. He expects that this approach to creating magnetisation patterns will provide researchers in diamagnetic levitation with much more flexibility, making it possible to create and test different patterns quickly, and accelerate the research and development process:

"Researchers will be able to print field patterns needed for diamagnetic levitation tracks, bearings or sensors with a free floating seismic mass. Field pattern design and printing could be iteratively adapted to specific requirements in a matter of minutes. So, in the short-term, I would see a benefit in cut-down development times and in the long-term, it would be imaginable that such monolithic magnets for diamagnetic levitation will be mass produced."

A strong future

Küstler has since been investigating single magnet diamagnetic levitation using different multipole magnetisation patterns and has demonstrated levitation of multiple objects at the same time (see main image).

He has also investigated the levitation of a 25 µm thin graphene sheet, which suggests another possible long term application. "From the literature, it is known that by heating up a diamagnetic sheet partly with a laser beam, it can be moved over the surface of a magnet array. So, by combining the most recent developments in this field, it is possible to imagine a monolithic multipole magnet where one can move tiny sheets of graphene using lasers. That would be a step in the direction of micro-robots. Approaches in this field were also reported recently," says Küstler.

"Lab-on-chips would be another long-term topic. Personally, I'm keen to see the development of much stronger permanent magnets than we already have. Nanocomposite magnets or iron nitride magnets are already in development and promise an enormous increase in energy density compared to state-of-the-art NdFeB magnets. With such magnets, the levitation height and load bearing capacity in diamagnetic levitation applications could be significantly increased."

Explore further: Horizontal levitation: The ultimate solution to particle separation

More information: "Diamagnetic levitation of pyrolytic graphite over monolithic NdFeB magnet." G. Küstler Electronics Letters, Volume 50, Issue 18, 28 August 2014, p. 1289 – 1290. DOI:  10.1049/el.2014.2332 , Print ISSN 0013-5194, Online ISSN 1350-911X

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Levitating foam liquid under the spell of magnetic fields

Nov 11, 2013

Foams fascinate, partly due to their short lifespan. Foams change as fluid drains out of their structure over time. It is precisely their ephemeral nature which has, until now, prevented scientists from experimentally probing ...

Recommended for you

How Paramecium protozoa claw their way to the top

Sep 19, 2014

The ability to swim upwards – towards the sun and food supplies – is vital for many aquatic microorganisms. Exactly how they are able to differentiate between above and below in often murky waters is ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

jalmy
5 / 5 (1) Aug 28, 2014
What I want to know is....Can you make a hoverboard. Yes or No?
pmaher_art
not rated yet Aug 28, 2014
Is this not the Meissner Effect?
Jixo
not rated yet Aug 28, 2014
Can you make a hoverboard. Yes or No?
Yes, but you shouldn't be very fat and it would work only above tray pawed with magnets.
Is this not the Meissner Effect
it isn't - but the rudimentary similarity of both phenomena is still here. The electrons at the surface of graphite plates are nearly as fast, as the electrons within superconductors. The magnetic field forces the electrons to curve their path and to occupy larger volume at both cases, which leads into expelling force. The difference is, the electrons are held together with pushing force within superconductors, whereas in graphite only with pulling force - they're constrained with rather thick graphite plates and it's easier for them to avoid this constrain. Therefore the diamagnetic force is much weaker than the Meissner effect. But the graphite with layers well separated is claimed to be superconductive even at room temperature - in this case both effects would converge into single mechanism and force intensity.
Jixo
not rated yet Aug 28, 2014
The pyrolytic carbon is particularly effective in its diamagnetism, because it has well arranged structure of 2D monocrystal. It is also most diamagnetic against the cleavage plane, exhibiting the greatest diamagnetism (by weight) of any room-temperature diamagnet. It's high diamagnetism is followed with its excellent electric and heat conductivity along layers (even better than copper, BTW). It's simply a rudimentary superconductor (which has a 2D structure too, BTW).