Vehicles of 2017 could get 54.5 mpg
November 21, 2011 By Sandy Bauers
One of the most powerful points in Thomas Friedman's book, "Hot, Flat and Crowded," was that when President Ronald Reagan rolled back fuel efficiency standards for American vehicles, it wasted an amount of petroleum equivalent to what's under the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
Quite an image.
Since then, economy standards have eked upward.
The Obama administration recently announced standards for model year 2017-2025 passenger cars and light trucks. The proposal calls for increases in fuel efficiency equivalent to 54.5 mpg - if all reductions were made through fuel economy improvements. So clearly there's wiggle room here for other improvements to add up to fuel efficiency.
The latest standard, for model year vehicles 2012-2016, will raise fuel efficiency equivalent to 35.5 mpg by 2016.
According to the Environmental Protection Agency, cars, SUVs, minivans and pickup trucks are responsible for nearly 60 percent of U.S. transportation-related petroleum use and greenhouse gas emissions. The agency says that today's proposed standards would reduce oil consumption by 4 billion barrels and cut 2 billion metric tons of greenhouse gas pollution over the lifetimes of the vehicles sold in those years.
On the level of an individual consumer, the agency said that the new standards would cost an average of up to $6,600 in fuel costs over the lifetime of a model year 2025 vehicle for a net lifetime savings of $4,400 after factoring in related increases in vehicle cost.
"Overall, the net benefit to society from this rule would total more than $420 billion over the lifetime of the vehicles sold in model year 2017-2025," the EPA said in a press release.
Environmental groups praised the move.
"The Obama administration's clean cars proposal represents the biggest step ever taken to end America's addition to Big Oil," said Jillian Hertzberg, Clean Vehicles Associate with Environment America, in a press release. "By making the cars and trucks of the future cleaner and more fuel efficient, these standards will reap big benefits for our environment, our health and our economy."
More information: Read more about the proposal: http://www.nhtsa.g … fuel-economy
(c)2011 The Philadelphia Inquirer
Distributed by MCT Information Services
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
4 comments
-
Need a rigid insulation material???
20 hours ago
-
magnets or EMF in car bumpers to protect from fender bender
May 26, 2012
-
length of wire in a coil of known dimensions?
May 25, 2012
-
India Engineering Powerhouse
May 25, 2012
-
electromagnet core dereference between hard and soft iron
May 25, 2012
-
Measuring water pressure in an open tank
May 24, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Engineering
More news stories
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
12 hours ago |
5 / 5 (2) |
3
Probability of contamination from severe nuclear reactor accidents is higher than expected: study
Catastrophic nuclear accidents such as the core meltdowns in Chernobyl and Fukushima are more likely to happen than previously assumed. Based on the operating hours of all civil nuclear reactors and the number ...
Technology / Energy & Green Tech
May 22, 2012 |
3.6 / 5 (22) |
56
|
HyperSolar shows dirty water no barrier to power world
(Phys.org) -- The Santa Barbara, California, company, HyperSolar, is set to transparently share the ups and downs of its research experiences toward the companys ultimate vision, successfully producing ...
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
Tesla to launch electric sedan in US on June 22
Tesla Motors said Tuesday it would begin deliveries of "the world's first premium electric sedan" on June 22, slightly ahead of schedule.
Technology / Energy & Green Tech
May 22, 2012 |
4.5 / 5 (12) |
18
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study
(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.
Nov 21, 2011
Rank: 4.4 / 5 (7)
Nov 21, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (4)
Nov 22, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Where is the problem? Why do some car manufacturers need to strain to get these values when it's obviously already being done?
Nov 22, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (2)
b) U.S. cars tend to be bigger and heavier
c) U.S. road surfaces tend to really suck in comparison to German autobahns (I've driven on both, so I know this from direct experience)
d) They are talking about FLEET AVERAGE fuel economy. That means ordinary and compact cars would have to greatly exceed the average, because pickup trucks/SUVs/minivans will be below that average.
Nov 22, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
I use gasoline. Not diesel.
True. But there's no real point why this should be so.
Me too. I agree. Road surfaces (and tires) suck in the US (at least in some parts. West coast didn't seem that bad with respect to road conditions). But that also doesn't need to stay that way.
They should stop selling that crap to people. No one needs them apart from the occasional business or the one-in-a-million outdoor enthusiast.
Nov 22, 2011
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (2)
If we had denser population centers with more public transport... But that won't happen any time soon. What's done is done, and now we have to sleep in it.
Nov 22, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
What do you think we have? Toaster ovens? There's probably not a car on the road that doesn't have AC by now (and uses it).
I haul groceries, too. Whether you drive 2km or 200km to a fair/go shopping doesn't make a bit of a difference to the size of the car you need. And I have yet to see anyone who NEEDS a SUV or truck to haul groceries.
And the 'state fair'/'soccer mom' argument is bogus. That happens what - like twice a year? You can find alternatives for that (e.g. just renting a car for that one occasion - which is what I do when I have to haul some furniture ).
And no - I haven't used public transport for years. A normal sized car is sufficient for almost anything.
Nov 22, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Not necessarily. In having more fuel efficiency the consumer will have less fuel cost and therefore will drive more and emit more EVIL greenhouse gas emissions than before. But these vehicles are expensive to begin with so the principal cost of the car may incentize consumers not to drive so often. It also depends on the price of oil. These EPA dunderheads are not forecasting dynamically and have no sense of economics.
Nov 22, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Riiiight. Because you always ask yourself before every trip: Can I afford it? Nah. Gas is too expensive. Guess I won't take the trip.
That's total BS.