GE uranium enrichment plans raise fears: report
The Exelon Byron Nuclear Generating Stations in Byron, Illinois. US conglomerate General Electric is seeking permission to build a $1 billion plant for uranium enrichment by laser, a process which has raised proliferation fears, The New York Times said.
US conglomerate General Electric is seeking permission to build a $1 billion plant for uranium enrichment by laser, a process which has raised proliferation fears, The New York Times said Sunday.
After testing the enrichment process for two years, GE has asked the US government to approve its plans for a massive facility in North Carolina that could produce reactor fuel by the ton, the report said, citing GE officials.
"We are currently optimizing the design," Christopher Monetta, president of Global Laser Enrichment, a subsidiary operated by GE and Japan's Hitachi, said in an interview with the newspaper.
The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission is expected to deliver its decision on whether to issue a commercial license for the complex by next year, the report said.
Uranium enrichment can be used to produce both the fuel for a nuclear reactor and the fissile material for an atomic warhead. New technologies are seen as potentially dangerous as they make it easier to build a bomb.
Monetta said the plant could enrich enough uranium each year to fuel up to 60 large reactors -- in theory, enough to power 42 million homes, or a third of all homes in the United States.
Donald Kerr, a former director of the Los Alamos National Laboratory who was recently briefed on GE's advance, said laser enrichment "appears to be close to a real industrial process" and a genuine technological breakthrough.
But critics say the technology could be co-opted by rogue states such as Iran or terror groups and used in the covert production of weapons, as it would be more difficult to detect small laser-equipped facilities.
"We're on the verge of a new route to the bomb," Frank von Hippel, a nuclear physicist who advised former US president Bill Clinton and now teaches at Princeton University, told the Times.
"We should have learned enough by now to do an assessment before we let this kind of thing out."
(c) 2011 AFP
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
Need a rigid insulation material???
13 hours ago
-
magnets or EMF in car bumpers to protect from fender bender
May 26, 2012
-
length of wire in a coil of known dimensions?
May 25, 2012
-
India Engineering Powerhouse
May 25, 2012
-
electromagnet core dereference between hard and soft iron
May 25, 2012
-
Measuring water pressure in an open tank
May 24, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Engineering
More news stories
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
6 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
2
Probability of contamination from severe nuclear reactor accidents is higher than expected: study
Catastrophic nuclear accidents such as the core meltdowns in Chernobyl and Fukushima are more likely to happen than previously assumed. Based on the operating hours of all civil nuclear reactors and the number ...
Technology / Energy & Green Tech
May 22, 2012 |
3.6 / 5 (22) |
56
|
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
HyperSolar shows dirty water no barrier to power world
(Phys.org) -- The Santa Barbara, California, company, HyperSolar, is set to transparently share the ups and downs of its research experiences toward the companys ultimate vision, successfully producing ...
Tesla to launch electric sedan in US on June 22
Tesla Motors said Tuesday it would begin deliveries of "the world's first premium electric sedan" on June 22, slightly ahead of schedule.
Technology / Energy & Green Tech
May 22, 2012 |
4.5 / 5 (11) |
18
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say
(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives may do more harm ...
Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?
(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...
Aug 22, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Aug 22, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
I wonder if this process would work on reprocessing spent fuel as well. >95% of the waste is unenriched Uranium.
Aug 22, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Luni Toonist at it again.
Nuke industry wants to provide
renewable radioactive nuclei. No safe solution exist.
This is NOT a safe clean process but emits many residual
high energy particles that are released outside the
containment boundary.
:(
Aug 22, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Coal plants emit radioactive waste.
http://www.scient...ar-waste
See? That is how you back up a claim so as to not sound like a raving lunatic.
Aug 23, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Aug 23, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Aug 23, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Aug 23, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Go GE! Hope it reduces costs by a factor of 10!
Aug 24, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Coal, Oil, Shale, Isotopes, and Natural Gas aren't a good solutions either.
The energy lobbyist are spending alot of money to keep
these dirty energies on the front burner.
The American people are wise to this and a change in future
energy production for the US is needed.
NO business as usual, the country needs new renewable technology that doesn't pollute, destroy the environment, produce toxic or waste materials.
I know America is up to the challenge we just need BIG energy
to lead or get out of the way.
Aug 24, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
That rules out just about everything. You think they grow solar cells in an organic garden or something?
Aug 24, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
They are on the front burner because they are cheap. No one here thinks renewables that are cheaper than coal are a bad idea. No one. They just dont exist. And yes, we are spending money to research them, so dont pretend we can just assign a few research dollars and fix everything, because we already are.
Just because you demand utopia doesnt mean it is feasible.
Aug 24, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
new research needs funding and to say new technology is
useless because we have to develop it is counter productive.
silicon valley startups for example start with great amounts of investments.
just because there cheap doesn't make it right.
Aug 24, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
not what i said at all, i just said that we are ALREADY financing the research.
And you still have yet to back up your wild claim about this technology (laser enrichment) losing containment of radioactivity. Please do.
Aug 24, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
You need to prove that it isn't.
Aug 25, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
You are the one making very specific claims, not me. I am just curious where you got your information. I'll take that final response as an admission that you simply made up the whole thing. What a waste of time.
Aug 25, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Aug 25, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
http://web.mit.ed...arpower/
Alot more information on the web.
It amuses me when people who can't defend their position
intellectually must resort to name calling as their argument.
Have a Nice Day.
Aug 25, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
as you said above.
That is what fmfbrestel is arguing.
Aug 25, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
2 - I am not defending ANYTHING, I am just asking for a source for your very specific claim of a containment failure.
3 - If your claim is true, it is important. I have tried to find a source to back it up, but I cant - which is why I asked you for your source.
4 - It amuses me when people intentionally lie on a science message board because they disagree with the topic.