Report presents best policy options to reduce petroleum use

Jun 23, 2011

It will take more than tougher fuel economy standards for U.S. transportation to significantly cut its oil use over the next half century. It will likely require a combination of measures that foster consumer and supplier interest in vehicle fuel economy, alternative fuels, and a more efficient transportation system, says a new report from the National Research Council. Public interest in reducing the cost of securing the nation's energy supplies, curbing emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases (GHGs), and improving transportation operations could motivate such varied actions.

"It is not simply a matter of choosing a single best policy," said Emil Frankel, director of transportation policy, Bipartisan Policy Center, Washington, D.C., and chair of the committee that wrote the report. "Decisions about whether and how to reduce transportation's use of oil will require officials to consider a range of options."

The U.S. accounts for more than two-thirds of the nation's oil use and about 25 percent of its . Federal regulations over the past 40 years such as have helped the transportation sector make significant gains in controlling its oil use and emissions. However, these measures are likely to do little more than temper growth in the sector's carbon dioxide emissions and demand for oil over the next several decades, the committee said.

To achieve earlier, larger, and sustained gains, a longer-term strategy involving a mix of policy measures and impacts on demand and supplies is needed. The report was developed to inform policymakers of the pros and cons of available policy options to reduce and emissions over time from cars, trucks, and aircraft -- the U.S. transportation modes that collectively account for 95 percent of transportation oil use.

The examined in the report include a range of approaches but are not ranked in any particular order:

  • land-use and travel-demand management measures aimed at curbing household vehicle use
  • low-carbon standards for transportation fuels
  • public investments in transportation infrastructure to increase vehicle operating efficiencies
  • transportation fuel taxes
  • vehicle efficiency standards, "feebates," and other financial incentives to motivate interest in vehicle efficiency
Because some of the policies are market and demand oriented, others regulatory, and others hybrids of the two, they produce different responses from users and suppliers of transportation vehicles and fuels. They also have different track records of implementation and thus differing prospects for early application.

The report says that any serious actions must ultimately cut the amount of oil used and GHGs emitted from the nation's 225 million cars and light trucks. Policymakers need to look beyond measures that center largely on suppliers of vehicles and fuels and adopt policies that will also cause consumers to respond with strong and sustained interest in saving energy and lowering emissions.

In assessing opportunities for policy, the report says fuel taxes have both the greatest applicability across modes and the widest scope of impact. Raising fuel prices can lead to increased consumer and supplier interest in more fuel-efficient vehicles and operations. It can also reduce the total amount of energy-intensive travel by making it more expensive.

However, political resistance to fuel taxes is high. The federal gas tax, approximately 18 cents per gallon, has not been raised since 1993. To make this a more viable option over time, pursuing innovative ways to use the new tax dollars could help spur and sustain public support.

The committee said that vehicle standards with a more focused impact on vehicle energy and emissions performance have the advantage of familiarity and public acceptance. This advantage is important because it can mean early savings in oil use and emissions. Purchase incentive programs that impose fees on inefficient vehicles to fund rebates on efficient ones -- known as feebates -- may ultimately motivate consumers to buy the newer designs. However, neither efficiency standards nor such purchase incentives will prompt vehicle users to engage in more energy-efficient operations, such as driving less or carpooling more.

Creating an environment less dependent on private vehicles may pay dividends by reducing the total demand for vehicle travel, but this may take decades to bring about through land-use planning and controls. In the meantime, public investment in infrastructure for highways, airways, and waterways can make transportation more efficient while reducing system delays and congestion. These operational benefits may be politically palatable ways to save energy and emissions in the near term, especially if consumers face higher energy prices down the road.

Explore further: Researchers develop unique waste cleanup for rural areas

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

US finalizes new auto fuel economy standards

Apr 01, 2010

The US government Thursday finalized new automobile fuel economy standards starting with 2012 models, a move officials said would save billions of barrels of oil and reduce greenhouse emissions.

US sets new standards for truck, bus emissions

Oct 26, 2010

The United States on Monday unveiled new standards for heavy-duty trucks, vans, buses and delivery vehicles, aimed at improving their fuel efficiency and reducing emissions by up to 20 percent.

Charting a course toward cleaner cars

Apr 01, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- The emissions from cars and light trucks account for 16 percent of the total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the United States, and these vehicles use 47 percent of all the petroleum consumed ...

Recommended for you

Peugeot hybrid compressed-air car set for Paris Motor Show

13 hours ago

An 860-kilogram concept city car from Peugeot indicates impressive fuel economy. This latest concept "has its sights set on meeting the French government's goal of putting an affordable 2.0l/100km (141mpg) car into production by 2020," said Jordan Bis ...

Apps for electric cars

17 hours ago

Siemens is equipping electric cars with completely redesigned information and communications technology (ICT). Basically, the idea is to control a variety of vehicle functions on a uniform, centralized computer ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

zevkirsh
not rated yet Jun 23, 2011
the real problem with getting more efficiency out of vehicles is what do you do when gas is cheap? when it's cheap , everyone wastes it, only when it is expensive, people care without forcing them to care., the answer is very high gas taxes.

the national academy of sciences is notable for providing 'extensive' research and reporting. this process of reporting is total nonsense. it is more government funded wasted dollars.
it has been proven that a complex regulatory regime with notice and comment period is just another disguise for industry capturing government with lobbying money ( even when that money comes from bailout sponsored loans that are essentially government handouts). you either have command and control or you dont.

the simple truth is that the markets work very well. even though the price of gas is heavily controlled, it tends to inflate far ahead of the curve as it is part of the petro-dollar inflation balancing mechanism. thus ensuring people save gas or pay the pric