Canadian nuclear plant 'leaked radioactive water'

Mar 17, 2011
This file photo shows Toronto skyline, seen from Lake Ontario. Thousands of liters of radioactive water have been released into Lake Ontario as a result of an accident at a Canadian nuclear power plant, according to authorities.

Thousands of liters of radioactive water have been released into Lake Ontario as a result of an accident at a Canadian nuclear power plant, according to authorities.

"The event was a low level regulatory event with only negligible effect to the environment and no public health implications," Ontario Power said in a statement on Wednesday.

The power company, which is owned by the Ontario provincial government, said 73,000 liters (19,280 gallons) of was released into Lake Ontario from the Pickering Nuclear Station.

The Pickering , one of five in Canada, is located 35 kilometers (22 miles) east of Toronto, the country's largest city with 2.6 million inhabitants.

The company blamed the leak on a faulty pump seal and said it was stopped as soon as it was discovered.

"From a regulatory perspective, this is a very low-level event. There is no impact to quality of ," the power company said.

The Canadian commission on nuclear safety also said the risk to the environment and human health was "negligible."

The incident occurred against the backdrop of a nuclear crisis in Japan that has prompted debate in many countries about the safety of nuclear power plants.

Explore further: Pilot sites in energy from coffee waste show good results

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

California 'closely monitoring' Japan nuclear leak

Mar 13, 2011

California is closely monitoring efforts to contain leaks from a quake-damaged Japanese nuclear plant, a spokesman said Saturday, as experts said radiation could be blown out across the Pacific.

EU to mull 'stress tests' for nuclear plants

Mar 15, 2011

The European Union will discuss Tuesday whether to conduct "stress tests" on atomic power plants to check their safety in light of Japan's nuclear crisis, a European Commission spokeswoman said.

Britain looks at new nuclear plants

May 24, 2007

The British government says it will run out of power in the near future unless it increases its number of nuclear power plants in the country.

Recommended for you

Seoul to provide smartphone-charging down by the stream

Aug 29, 2014

Seoul's mobile users will be able to make use of outdoor charging stations at a popular downtown stream, powered by mini-hydroelectric turbines that use the stream's current. The city is building the recharging ...

Tesla, Chinese firm plan 400 charging stations

Aug 29, 2014

Tesla Motors Co. and a state-owned Chinese phone carrier announced plans Friday to build 400 charging stations for electric cars in a new bid to promote popular adoption of the technology in China.

Cool roofs in China can save energy and reduce emissions

Aug 28, 2014

(Phys.org) —Working with Chinese researchers, the Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) has conducted the first comprehensive study of cool roofs in China and concluded ...

User comments : 13

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Bob_Kob
5 / 5 (3) Mar 17, 2011
Cmon guys, get your act together. Keep this up and nuclear power will become something of the past...
syhprum
not rated yet Mar 17, 2011
In the UK both drivers would be discussing with their lawers claims for 'whiplash injury.
antialias
1 / 5 (1) Mar 17, 2011
They probably dumped this stuff right now because no one would be upset over it - everybody is looking at Japan. in other times people would have been upset.
drivin98
1 / 5 (2) Mar 17, 2011
Cmon guys, get your act together. Keep this up and nuclear power will become something of the past...


I doubt it, but one can dream.
ereneon
5 / 5 (3) Mar 17, 2011
This wouldn't even be news if the Japanese nuclear situation were not happening... Score one for sensationalized journalism.
damnfuct
5 / 5 (4) Mar 17, 2011
How radioactive was the water? It's sort of crucial to the whole story. If it's a "low level regulatory event," it's more than likely that the water was not seriously radioactive.
ryggesogn2
3.3 / 5 (6) Mar 17, 2011
'the waste produced by coal plants is actually more radioactive than that generated by their nuclear counterparts. In fact, the fly ash emitted by a power planta by-product from burning coal for electricitycarries into the surrounding environment 100 times more radiation than a nuclear power plant producing the same amount of energy."
http://www.scient...ar-waste
For reference.
Javinator
5 / 5 (4) Mar 17, 2011
For anyone interested here is the release by OPG (Ontario Power Generation) about the leak:

http(delete me)//www.opg.com/news/releases/110316lowlevelwaterrelease.pdf
Temple
4.6 / 5 (10) Mar 17, 2011
Some interesting figures from the OPG release above:
The filtered (demineralised) water contained trace amounts of tritium, far below any regulatory limits. Routine content of tritium in water at local water treatment plants is generally between six and 10 becquerels per litre

The estimates of the maximum potential impact of this release means a tritium increase of .56 becquerels per litre


So the conservatively estimated leak (assuming highest possible volume actually did leak) will result in an increase of the tritium levels in the water from 6-10 to 6.6-10.6.

Some legal limits of tritium in drinking water (from wikipedia):
Canada: 7000 Bq/L
United States: 740 Bq/L
World Health Organization: 10,000 Bq/L
European Union: 100 Bq/L (investigative threshold)

Score one for sensational journalism.
ormondotvos
not rated yet Mar 18, 2011
Thank you, Temple. Quality post.
Jimee
1 / 5 (1) Mar 20, 2011
Perhaps the nuclear pushers can move into the plants in order to act as shields to help the rest of us trust their judgment, until a disaster strikes which can't be covered up.
CarolinaScotsman
5 / 5 (2) Mar 21, 2011
This just in: it was announced today that a major news organization, AFP, had on March 17 released 73,000 liters (19,280 gallons) of drivel onto the internet.
COCO
1 / 5 (2) Mar 21, 2011
nothing here - the area of the plant is NOT inhabited by many important people - move along.........