Experiments show natural selection opposes sexual selection

Experiments show natural selection opposes sexual selection
An assassin bug approaching a male broad-horned flour beetle. Credit: University of Exeter

Natural selection can reverse evolution that occurs through sexual selection and this can lead to better females, new research shows.

The study—led by the University of Exeter and Okayama University—examined broad-horned , whose males have exaggerated mandibles, while females do not.

Male beetles with the largest mandibles win more fights and mate with more females—an example of "", where certain characteristics (like a male peacock's tail) improve mating success.

However, having bigger mandibles requires a masculinized body (large head and neck), and a smaller abdomen—which, for females, limits the number of eggs they can carry. A masculinized body is not good for females.

Experimentally enhanced through predation, however, targets the same males favored by sexual selection and this results in the evolution of less masculinized bodies and better-quality females.

In the study, broad-horned flour beetles were exposed to a predator called the assassin bug, which ate males with the largest mandibles.

By removing these males, predation effectively reduced the benefits of sexual selection and this means natural selection has an increased impact.

Experiments show natural selection opposes sexual selection
Broad-horned flour beetles. Credit: University of Exeter

After eight generations of this, females produced about 20% more offspring across their lifespan, compared to a control group of beetles where large-horned males were not removed by predation.

"Males and females of every species share genes, but in some cases—including broad-horned flour beetles—the genes good for one sex aren't always ideal for the other," said Professor David Hosken, of the University of Exeter.

"We see this process, known as intralocus sexual conflict, across the .

"For example, humans share the genes for hips—which males need for walking, and females need for both walking and childbirth.

"Optimal hips for women would be broad enough to allow childbirth, while optimal hip width for men is narrower.

"Humans reach a sort of evolutionary compromise, in which neither males nor females get the that would be optimal for them."

Professor Hosken added: "Our findings show that sexual selection favoring large-horned drags female body shape away from the female optima.

"This study helps us understand two evolutionary tug of wars, one between natural and sexual selection and the other that takes place over body shape and characteristics shared between the sexes."

The paper, published in the journal Nature Communications, is entitled: "Natural increases female fitness by reversing the exaggeration of a male sexually selected trait."


Explore further

Exploring why males are larger than females among mammals

More information: "Natural selection increases female fitness by reversing the exaggeration of a male sexually selected trait" Nature Communications (2021). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23804-7
Journal information: Nature Communications

Citation: Experiments show natural selection opposes sexual selection (2021, June 8) retrieved 28 July 2021 from https://phys.org/news/2021-06-natural-opposes-sexual.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
399 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments