Most engineered nanoparticles enter tumours through cells, not between them

Most engineered nanoparticles enter tumours through cells, not between them
A transmission emission microscopy image of the endothelial cells surrounding blood vessels. The solid arrows indicate that the nanoparticles (dark spots) are engulfed by the endothelial cells instead of passing through gaps between the cells. Credit: Shrey Sindhwani

Researchers from U of T Engineering have discovered that an active, rather than passive, process dictates which nanoparticles enter solid tumors. The finding upends previous thinking in the field of cancer nanomedicine and points toward more effective nanotherapies.

The prevailing theory in cancer nanomedicine—an approach that enables more targeted therapies than standard chemotherapy—has been that mainly diffuse passively into tumors through tiny gaps between in the endothelium, which lines the inner wall of blood vessels that support tumor growth.

The researchers previously showed that less than one percent of nanoparticle-based drugs typically reach their tumor targets. In the current study, the team found that among nanoparticles that do penetrate tumors, more than 95 percent pass through —not between gaps among those cells.

"Our work challenges long-held dogma in the field and suggests a completely new theory," says Abdullah Syed, a co-lead author on the study and postdoctoral fellow in the lab of Warren Chan, a professor at the Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering (IBBME) and the Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research.

The study was published today in Nature Materials.

"We saw many nanoparticles enter the endothelial cells from blood vessels and exit into the tumor in various conditions. Endothelial cells appear to be crucial gatekeepers in the nanoparticle transport process."

Syed compares nanoparticles to people trying to get into popular restaurants on a busy night. "Some restaurants don't require a reservation, while others have bouncers who check if patrons made reservations," he says. "The bouncers are a lot more common than researchers thought, and most places only accept patrons with a reservation."

The researchers established that passive diffusion was not the mechanism of entry with multiple lines of evidence. They took more than 400 images of tissue samples from animal models, and saw few endothelial gaps relative to nanoparticles. They observed the same trend using 3-D fluorescent imaging and live-animal imaging.

Similarly, they found few gaps between endothelial cells in samples from human cancer patients.

The group then devised an that completely stopped the transportation of nanoparticles through endothelial cells. This allowed them to isolate the contribution of passive transport via gaps between endothelial cells, which proved to be miniscule.

The researchers posit several active mechanisms by which endothelial cells might transport nanoparticles into tumors, including binding mechanisms, intra-endothelial channels and as-yet undiscovered processes, all of which they are investigating.

Meanwhile, the results have major implications for nanoparticle-based therapeutics.

"These findings will change the way we think about delivering drugs to tumors using nanoparticles," says Shrey Sindhwani, also a co-lead author on the paper and an MD/Ph.D. student in Chan's lab. "A better understanding of the nanoparticle transport phenomenon will help researchers design more effective therapies."

Explore further

Targeting cancer cells with nanoparticles

More information: Shrey Sindhwani et al. The entry of nanoparticles into solid tumours, Nature Materials (2020). DOI: 10.1038/s41563-019-0566-2
Journal information: Nature Materials

Citation: Most engineered nanoparticles enter tumours through cells, not between them (2020, January 14) retrieved 24 June 2021 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments