Existing climate models useful in forecasting, model testing

Existing climate models useful in forecasting, model testing
Satellite image showing El Niño sea surface temperature departure from the norm for October 2015, where orange-red colors are above normal and indicative of El Niño. Credit: NOAA

A team of scientists has figured out a shortcut way to produce skillful seasonal climate forecasts with a fraction of the computing power normally needed. The technique involves searching within existing global climate models to learn what happened when the ocean, atmosphere and land conditions were similar to what they are today. These "model-analogs" to today end up producing a remarkably good forecast, the team found—and the finding could help researchers improve new climate models and forecasts of seasonal events such as El Niño.

"It's a big data project. We found we can mine very useful information from existing to mimic how they would make a with current initial conditions," said Matt Newman, a CIRES scientist working in NOAA's Physical Sciences Division and co-author of the study published today in the AGU journal Geophysical Research Letters.

Scientists typically make seasonal forecasts by observing the current global conditions, plugging that estimate into a climate model, and then running the model's equations forward in time several months using supercomputers. These computationally intensive calculations can only be done at a few national forecast centers and large research institutions.

However, scientists use similar computer models for long simulations of the Earth's pre-industrial climate. Those model simulations—and there are many—already exist and are freely available to anyone doing climate change studies. Newman and his colleagues decided they would try developing seasonal forecasts from these existing climate model simulations, instead of making new model computations.

Hui Ding, the paper's lead author and also a CIRES scientist working in NOAA's Physical Sciences Division, wrote a computer program that searched the huge database of climate model simulations to find the best matches to the current observed ocean surface conditions in a given region of interest. To get the seasonal forecast, the researchers tracked how these model-analogs evolved within the over the next several months.

They found that the model-analog technique was as skillful as more traditional forecasting methods. This means that long-existing climate model simulations are useful as an independent way to produce seasonal climate forecasts, including seasonal El Niño-related forecasts. "Instead of relying only on sophisticated forecast systems to forecast El Niño, we can mine these runs and find good enough analogs to develop a current forecast," he said.

Researchers can also use this technique to test models during the development phase. "They can look at how well forecasts from these new models compare to forecasts from pre-existing models matched for current conditions. That's a quick test to see if the new models are improved," Newman said.


Explore further

Why predicting the weather and climate is even harder for Australia's rainy northern neighbours

More information: Hui Ding et al. Diagnosing secular variations in retrospective ENSO seasonal forecast skill using CMIP5 model-analogs, Geophysical Research Letters (2019). DOI: 10.1029/2018GL080598
Journal information: Geophysical Research Letters

This story is republished courtesy of AGU Blogs (http://blogs.agu.org), a community of Earth and space science blogs, hosted by the American Geophysical Union. Read the original story here.

Citation: Existing climate models useful in forecasting, model testing (2019, February 14) retrieved 26 May 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-02-climate_1_2.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
6 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Feb 14, 2019
Basically, what they are saying is that for any period, say late spring, they search the existing data for a matching condition in the past. This then is the initial condition and so the subsequent outcome is likely to be very similar, that is, the weather/climate in later periods.

On the down side, the fact that climate does not trivially cycle indicates the condition are never quite the same and the contributors to subsequent climate are never known exactly (eg the activity of the sun, not to mention the butterfly effect).

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more