War on weeds takes toll on beneficial bacteria in the soil

As farmers battle in their above-ground war on weeds, they may inadvertently create underground casualties – unintentionally attacking the beneficial bacteria that help crops guard against enemy fungus, according to Cornell University research.

Specifically, Cornell researchers found negative consequences of the weed-killing herbicide glyphosate on Pseudomonas, a -friendly bacteria.

"Beneficial Pseudomonas in the soil can help crops thrive. They can produce plant-stimulating hormones to promote plant growth and antifungals to defeat problematic fungi – such as Pythium and Fusarium – found in agricultural soil, but previous studies reported that the abundance of decreased when the herbicide glyphosate seeps underground," said Ludmilla Aristilde, assistant professor of biological and environmental engineering. "Our study seeks to understand why this happens."

Soil bacteria require their proteins – composed of – and their metabolism to support cellular growth and the production of important metabolites to sustain their underground fight. But glyphosate applied to crops can drain into the soil and disrupt the molecular factories in the bacterial cells in some species, interfering with their metabolic and amino acid machinery.

The new findings show that glyphosate does not target the amino acid production and metabolic gadgetry equally among the Pseudomonas species. For example, when Pseudomonas protegens, a bacteria used as a biocontrol agent for cereal crops, and Pseudomonas fluorescens, used as a fungus biocontrol for fruit trees, were exposed to varying glyphosate concentrations, the researchers noted no ill effects. However, in two species of Pseudomonas putida, used in soil fungus control for corn and other , the bacteria had notably stunted growth, said Aristilde, who is a faculty fellow at Cornell's Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future.

"Thus, if a farmer is using Pseudomonas fluorescens as a biocontrol, then it is probably okay to use glyphosate," Aristilde said. "But if the farmer uses Pseudomonas putida to control the fungus in the soil, then glyphosate is more likely to prevent the from doing its job."

The study offers molecular details for why adverse effects on Pseudomonas are species-specific. "That's actually good news because – as a society – we will likely not stop using herbicide completely," said Aristilde. "If that is the case, farmers need to know which beneficial soil biocontrol they're using can be susceptible. If they're using a strain that is susceptible and conflicting with their herbicide application, then it is a problem. That's the bottom line."

"Glyphosate-Induced Specific and Widespread Perturbations in the Metabolome of Soil Pseudomonas Species" was published in Frontiers of Environmental Science in June 2017.


Explore further

Glyphosate-resistant 'superweeds' may be less susceptible to diseases

More information: Ludmilla Aristilde et al. Glyphosate-Induced Specific and Widespread Perturbations in the Metabolome of Soil Pseudomonas Species, Frontiers in Environmental Science (2017). DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2017.00034
Provided by Cornell University
Citation: War on weeds takes toll on beneficial bacteria in the soil (2017, October 24) retrieved 16 September 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2017-10-war-weeds-toll-beneficial-bacteria.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
2 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more