New 3-D models illustrate the effect of material roughness on electrons emitted from the surface of a photocathode

Models clarify physics at photocathode surfaces
Four time snapshots from a model simulation. The simulation shows electrons (red dots) moving inside the antimony photocathode after photons are absorbed. Some electrons are emitted (green dots) from the photocathode surface while some are reflected back into the material. The number of electrons that are emitted is dependent on the applied electric field, the surface roughness of the photocathode material, and the energy of absorbed photons. Credit: Dimitre A. Dimitrov

Photocathodes used in linear accelerator facilities, free electron lasers and advanced X-ray light sources generate a beam of electrons to probe matter at an atomic level. Advances in materials science have improved the composition of materials used in photocathode production that can operate at visible wavelengths and produce a beam with reduced transverse electron momentum spread.

Despite these advances, the surface of the continues to limit beam properties. A research team created computer models to bridge the gap between theoretical and experimental studies to provide a better picture of the physics at the surface of the photocathode. The results are published this week in the Journal of Applied Physics.

A colder beam produces a brighter electron source, but can destroy the coldness of the . Dimitre A. Dimitrov, a scientist at Tech-X Corp and one of the publication's authors, is working with others to optimize on this characteristic.

"For the first time, we can grow cathodes with specifically designed surface on the experimental side," Dimitrov said. "The physics at the surface of a photocathode is incredibly complex, and we need to understand it better [to] create electron beams with optimal properties."

This work is the first time there has been a comprehensive attempt to do realistic modeling of the essential physics at the surface of the photocathode as photons are absorbed and electrons emitted. Using specialized software, the team created 3-D models that simulated electron emissions from photocathodes with flat and varied surface roughness.

The research team used the models to simulate emissions from the of a flat, antimony . They compared the simulations to experimental data to evaluate properties, including , which quantifies the number of electrons emitted per absorbed photon, and transverse emittance, or the electron emission perpendicular to the direction of propagation. The team also compared simulations of antimony of known roughness to experimental data to evaluate the same emission properties.

"From this work, we hope to gain an understanding of how smooth surfaces have to be and over what spatial scales, to assist in the design of photocathodes for next generation ultra-bright photon and electron sources," said Howard Padmore, division deputy at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

The simulations in this study did not include the effect of variation in light on . Future research will examine this variable to understand its effect on the distribution of loaded electrons, which could affect . The research team, which also includes scientists from Brookhaven National Laboratory, modeled antimony in their study but they want to study other materials and compare that data to the results of their antimony study.

More information: "Modeling quantum yield, emittance and surface roughness effects from metallic photocathodes," Journal of Applied Physics, DOI: 10.1063/1.4996568

Journal information: Journal of Applied Physics

Citation: New 3-D models illustrate the effect of material roughness on electrons emitted from the surface of a photocathode (2017, October 25) retrieved 22 July 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Black gold: Enabling bright, high rep-rate electron beams


Feedback to editors