Study finds hydrate gun hypothesis unlikely

August 23, 2017, CAGE
By extracting the pore water from the sediment cores, the scientist can measure the chemical processes associated with long term methane release. Credit: Maja Sojtaric/CAGE - Centre for Arctic Gas Hydrate, Environment and Climate

Clathrate (hydrate) gun hypothesis stirred quite the controversy when it was posed in 2003. It stated that methane hydrates—frozen water cages containing methane gas found below the ocean floor—can melt due to increasing ocean temperatures.

According to the hypothesis, this melt can happen in the time span of a human life, dissociating vast amounts of hydrate and releasing methane into the atmosphere. Consequently, this would lead to a runaway process in which the methane released would add to the global budget of greenhouse gases, and further accelerate the warming of the planet.

Limited impact at an Arctic site

This dramatic hypothesis inspired science fiction and scientists alike, spurring the latter to further investigate the sensitivity of hydrates. A new study in Nature Communications has found that the hydrate gun hypothesis seems increasingly unlikely, at least for a specific site in the Arctic Ocean that is highly susceptible to warming.

"Short-term temperature warming has limited impact on the gas hydrate stability. We show that warming can significantly affect gas hydrates in the seabed only when ocean temperature is constantly rising for several centuries," says the lead author of the study Dr. Wei-Li Hong of CAGE and currently Geological Survey of Norway.

Methane seepage from seabed at known gas hydrate zone in the Arctic Ocean. Credit: CAGE - Centre for Arctic Gas Hydrate, Environment and Climate

Hydrate mounds seeping methane for thousands of years

Hong and colleagues reported on an increase of methane flux beneath large mounds of hydrates in an area called Storfjordrenna, in the Barents Sea close to Svalbard. These gas hydrate pingos are all profusely seeping methane. But according to Hong, even though the area is shallow, and potentially susceptible to temperature change, these seeps are not intensifying because of the momentary warming.

"The increase of methane flux started several hundreds to thousands of years ago, which is well before any onset of warming in the Arctic Ocean that others have speculated," says Hong.

The study was based on measurements of pore chemistry in the sediments from the area. Pore water is water trapped in pores in soil, and can be analysed to reveal environmental changes in a given area through time. Scientists also analysed authigenic carbonate, a type of rock created through a chemical process in areas of , as well as measured bottom water temperatures. Data from these analyses was then used in a model experiment.

One of the gas hydrate mounds, also known as pingos, on the ocean floor in the Arctic. Credit: Pavel Serov; CAGE - Centre for Arctic Gas Hydrate, Environment and Climate

Natural state of the system

For the past century, bottom water in the area fluctuated seasonally from 1.8 to 4.6 degrees Celsius. Even though these fluctuations occurred quite often, they only affected that were shallower than 1.6 meters below the sea floor.

The hydrates are fed by a methane flow from deeper reservoirs. As this area was glaciated during the last ice age, this gas compacted into a layer under the pressure and cold temperatures under the ice sheet. Hydrates can be stable in the first 60 meters of sediments. "The results of our study indicate that the immense seeping found in this area is a result of natural state of the system. Understanding how interacts with other important geological, chemical and biological processes in the Earth system is essential and should be the emphasis of our scientific community," Hong states.

Explore further: Domes of frozen methane may be warning signs for new blow-outs

More information: Wei-Li Hong et al, Seepage from an arctic shallow marine gas hydrate reservoir is insensitive to momentary ocean warming, Nature Communications (2017). DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15745

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Site of the next major earthquake on the San Andreas Fault?

June 19, 2018

Many researchers hypothesize that the southern tip of the 1300-km-long San Andreas fault zone (SAFZ) could be the nucleation site of the next major earthquake on the fault, yet geoscientists cannot evaluate this hazard until ...

Palm oil: The carbon cost of deforestation

June 19, 2018

A recent study by EPFL and the Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL) shows that intensive farming of palm oil has a major impact on the environment. Both short- and long-term solutions exist, ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Caliban
5 / 5 (1) Aug 23, 2017
Two really inconclusive studies, whose conclusions don't necessarily follow from their findings, or at least not insofar as the findings are presented in (both of) the articles published here on Porg.

Both of them seem to acknowledge that further warming would likely trigger additional release of methane from clathrates, but then go on to say that it is unlikely without actually saying why they claim this to be so, when we clearly live in a warming world.

I wonder what is afoot? Is this really shoddy journalism? Really shoddy research? Both? Some kind of denierside-funded pseudoscience?

FFS.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.