Riddle of cement's structure is finally solved

February 9, 2016 by David L. Chandler, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
This image of a simulated concrete sample shows the "packing fraction" which describes the fraction of the volume that is filled with solid material. In this case, the average packing fraction is 0.52. Colors indicate the variations within the sample, ranging from less than 0.4 to more than 0.64. The size of the cube is 0.6 microns (millionths of a meter).

Concrete is the world's most widely used construction material, so abundant that its production is one of the leading sources of greenhouse gas emissions. Yet answers to some fundamental questions about the microscopic structure and behavior of this ubiquitous material have remained elusive.

Concrete forms through the solidification of a mixture of water, gravel, sand, and cement powder. Is the resulting glue material (known as cement hydrate, CSH) a continuous solid, like metal or stone, or is it an aggregate of small particles?

As basic as that question is, it had never been definitively answered. In a paper published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, a team of researchers at MIT, Georgetown University, and France's CNRS (together with other universities in the U.S., France, and U.K.) say they have solved that riddle and identified key factors in the structure of CSH that could help researchers work out better formulations for producing more durable concrete.

Roland Pellenq, a senior research scientist in MIT's department of civil and environmental engineering, director of the MIT-CNRS lab MSE2 hosted by the MIT Energy Initiative, and a co-author of the new paper, says the work builds on previous research he conducted with others at the Concrete Sustainability Hub (CSHub) through a collaboration between MIT and the CNRS. "We did the first atomic-scale model" of the structure of concrete, he says, but questions still remained about the larger, mesoscale structure, on scales of a few hundred nanometers. The new work addresses some of those remaining uncertainties, he says.

A bit of both

One key question was whether the solidified CSH material, which is composed of particles of many different sizes, should be considered a continuous matrix or an assembly of discrete particles. The answer turned out to be that it is a bit of both—the particle distribution is such that almost every space between grains is filled by yet smaller grains, to the point that it does approximate a continuous solid. "Those grains are in a very strong interaction at the mesoscale," he says.

"You can always find a smaller grain to fit in between" the larger grains, Pellenq says, and thus "you can see it as a continuous material." But the grains within the CSH "are not able to get to equilibrium," or a state of minimum energy, over length scales involving many grains, and this makes the material vulnerable to changes over time, he says. That can lead to "creep" of the solid concrete, and eventually cracking and degradation. "So both views are correct, in some sense," he explains.

The analysis of the structure of hardened concrete found that pores of different sizes play important roles in determining the material's characteristics. While smaller, nanoscale pores had been previously studied, mesoscale pores, ranging from 15 to 20 nanometers on up, had been more difficult to study and not well-characterized, Pellenq says. These pore spaces can play a major role in determining how susceptible the material is to water that can enter the material and cause cracking, eventually leading to structural failure. (This cracking, perhaps surprisingly, has nothing to do with the expansion of the water when it freezes, however).

The new mesoscale simulations are the first that can adequately match the sometimes conflicting and confusing results seen in experiments measuring the CSH texture, Pellenq says.

Toward better formulas

The new simulations make it possible to match the values of key characteristics such as stiffness, elasticity, and hardness, which are seen in real concrete samples. That shows that the modeling is useful, he says, and might help guide research on developing improved formulas, for example ones that reduce the required amount of water in the initial mix with cement powder. It is the manufacturing of the cement powder, a process that requires cooking limestone (with clays) at very high temperatures, that makes concrete production one of the leading sources of human-caused .

Fine-tuning the amount of water needed for a given application could also improve the material's durability, the researchers found. The amount of water used in the original mixture can make a big difference in concrete's longevity, even though most of that evaporates away during the setting process. While water is needed in order to make the slurry flow so that it can be poured in place, too much water leads to much bigger pore spaces and more loose, "fluffy" regions in the set concrete, the team found. Such regions might leave the material more vulnerable to later degradation, or could even be designed to improve its durability.

"This is a quintessential step towards the provision of a seamless atom-to-structure understanding of concrete, with huge mid-term practical impact in terms of material design and optimization," says Christian Hellmich, director of the Institute for Mechanics of Materials and Structures at the Vienna University of Technology, who was not involved in this research. He adds, "this research helps to promote research as a cutting-edge scientific discipline, where the cooperation of engineers and physicists emerges as a driving force for the reunification of natural sciences across the often too-tightly set boundaries of sub-disciplines."

Explore further: How to make stronger, 'greener' cement

More information: Mesoscale texture of cement hydrates. PNAS 2016 ; published ahead of print February 8, 2016, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1520487113

Related Stories

How to make stronger, 'greener' cement

September 25, 2014

Concrete is the world's most-used construction material, and a leading contributor to global warming, producing as much as one-tenth of industry-generated greenhouse-gas emissions. Now a new study suggests a way in which ...

Turning sewage sludge into concrete

August 27, 2015

The disposal of sludge from sewage water treatment is a big issue for wastewater plants in Malaysia. While studies show that the volume of sludge is expected to rise, disposal options are limited due to stricter environmental ...

Natural nanocrystals shown to strengthen concrete

March 31, 2015

Cellulose nanocrystals derived from industrial byproducts have been shown to increase the strength of concrete, representing a potential renewable additive to improve the ubiquitous construction material.

Recommended for you

Cryptocurrency rivals snap at Bitcoin's heels

January 14, 2018

Bitcoin may be the most famous cryptocurrency but, despite a dizzying rise, it's not the most lucrative one and far from alone in a universe that counts 1,400 rivals, and counting.

Top takeaways from Consumers Electronics Show

January 13, 2018

The 2018 Consumer Electronics Show, which concluded Friday in Las Vegas, drew some 4,000 exhibitors from dozens of countries and more than 170,000 attendees, showcased some of the latest from the technology world.

Finnish firm detects new Intel security flaw

January 12, 2018

A new security flaw has been found in Intel hardware which could enable hackers to access corporate laptops remotely, Finnish cybersecurity specialist F-Secure said on Friday.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (1) Feb 09, 2016
CSH stands for calcium silicate hydrate, dear. "The question" has never been "should [it] be considered a continuous matrix or an assembly of discrete particles?" The answer is:"It depends on context." Concrete is a mixture of cement and some discrete solid (sand & rock). Few rocks are chemically stable (quartz is one of only three minerals which are), but compared to cement, they are relatively inert. IOW, concrete is NOT chemically stable. It is also incorrect to think that composition predicts performance: processing dramatically affects physical properties, as does age & types & amounts of contaminates (including H2O, CO2 & SO4). So, since its performance is highly variable, the only question is: is their a floor for the critical physical properties of mixtures of this material? I guess is the answer is "Yes" and it will only require 30%-75% more material (weight) to guarantee the building doesn't collapse! In some structural applications this may be "good enough".
Feb 09, 2016
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.