Wild fish ecosystems may be masking serious rapid decline in fish production potential

New mathematics model shows that as the fish diversity of complex marine food webs declines, fish production resists the change, masking ultimate rapid loss

Fish are a main protein source for over a billion people worldwide and is one of the most traded food commodities. However, many commercial fisheries have become unsustainable due to practices such as overfishing and habitat destruction.

A study conducted by the National University of Singapore (NUS), Queen's University Belfast (UK), the Marine Institute (Ireland), and the Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas, UK), using a realistically complex mathematical model of ecosystems, found that as the fish diversity of complex declines, the remaining fish initially resist the change by compensating with an increase in production.

This resistance to change in wild fish ecosystems may be masking a more serious decline in production potential in situations where is already reported, posing the danger of providing a false sense of assurance until the biodiversity losses become too great.

The findings were first published online in the journal Nature Communications in March 2015.

Consequences of biodiversity loss on fish ecosystems

The team used a unique high performance mathematical model known as the Population-Dynamical Matching Model (PDMM) to represent thousands of coexisting species dynamically interacting as a food web in a complex ecosystem. This breakthrough in modelling allows the representation of features such as prey-switching, where predators preferentially target prey species in abundant supply in order to improve their chances of survival, and gradual assembly of a model food web similar to the natural process. Such detailed features encourage dynamic stability and coexistence of many model species, as well as accurate representation of real food webs.

The team sequentially deleted fish species from complex model marine ecosystems generated using the PDMM and after each deletion, observed the dynamics of the remaining fish species and measured the change in total fish production.

The study results showed that the prey of the deleted tended to resist the biodiversity loss by increasing their production, which helped to mitigate the decrease in total fish production. However, once the biodiversity losses became too great and only about a third of the species in a food web remained, a collapse ensued whereby production sharply declined with further species loss, as the relatively small percentage of remaining species were unable to provide much compensation.

Implications of findings

Due to the initial resistance to change, in situations where biodiversity loss has already been reported, any continued high production levels in wild fish ecosystems may be masking a more serious non-linear decline in production potential, severely threatening the world's security.

The findings show that it is vital to manage fisheries within the larger ecological context and that action to halt species loss may avert severe loss of production.

The team plans to use the model to further investigate the relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in order to allow for more informed management of fisheries.

More information: "Impact of biodiversity loss on production in complex marine food webs mitigated by prey-release." Nature Communications 6, Article number: 6657 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7657

Journal information: Nature Communications

Citation: Wild fish ecosystems may be masking serious rapid decline in fish production potential (2015, July 8) retrieved 27 April 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2015-07-wild-fish-ecosystems-masking-rapid.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Seafood supply altered by climate change

23 shares

Feedback to editors