New process could make gallium arsenide cheaper for computer chips, solar cells

New process could make gallium arsenide cheaper for computer chips, solar cells

Computer chips, solar cells and other electronic devices have traditionally been based on silicon, the most famous of the semiconductors, that special class of materials whose unique electronic properties can be manipulated to turn electricity on and off the way faucets control the flow of water.

There are other semiconductors. Gallium arsenide is one such material and it has certain technical advantages over silicon – electrons race through its crystalline structure faster than they can move through silicon.

But silicon has a crushing commercial advantage. It is roughly a thousand times cheaper to make. As a result, gallium arsenide-based devices are only used in niche applications where their special capabilities justify their higher cost.

Cellphones, for instance, typically rely on speedy gallium arsenide chips to process the high-frequency radio signals that arrive faster than silicon can handle.

Now Stanford researchers have invented a manufacturing process that could dramatically reduce the cost of making gallium arsenide and thus open up new uses for them, notably inside solar panels.

"Solar cells that use gallium arsenide hold the record when it comes to the efficiency at which they convert sunlight into electricity," said Bruce Clemens, the professor of materials science and engineering who led this work.

But silicon-based solar is so much cheaper to make that gallium arsenide are relegated to exotic applications such as satellites. There, the main cost is launching the satellite into orbit, so gallium arsenide solar panels pay their freight by virtue of their greater photon-to-electricity conversion efficiency.

Clemens, who is the Walter B. Reinhold Professor in the School of Engineering, said the Stanford process could make gallium arsenide solar cells more practical on Earth.

Writing in the journal MRS Communications, Clemens and co-author Garrett Hayes, who recently earned his doctorate in materials science from Stanford, describe this new manufacturing process.

Silicon is typically used in solar cells and computer chips. Gallium arsenide is an alternative material with many advantages. But it costs too much. A new process would reduce manufacturing costs. Credit: Clemens Research Group

Silicon and gallium arsenide both begin their progression from raw crystal to electronic device similarly. Both materials are fashioned into what electronics manufacturers call wafers. These are flat, circular platters of purified material. Subsequent manufacturing steps create computer chips, solar cells or other electronic devices on top of these wafers.

But it can cost about $5,000 to make a wafer of gallium arsenide 8 inches in diameter, versus $5 for a silicon wafer, according to Aneesh Nainani, who teaches semiconductor manufacturing at Stanford.

The new Stanford process seeks to lessen this thousand-to-one cost differential by reusing that $5,000 wafer.

Today the working electronic circuits in a gallium arsenide device are grown on top of this wafer. Manufacturers make this circuitry layer by flowing gaseous gallium arsenide and other materials across the wafer surface. This material condenses into thin layer of circuitry atop the wafer. In this scenario, the wafer is only a backing. The thin layer of circuitry on top of this costly platter contains all of the electronics.

To make the wafer reusable the Stanford process would add several steps to the manufacturing process. The researchers demonstrated the technique in their experiments.

First they covered the precious wafer with a layer of disposable material.

Then they used standard processes of gas deposition to form a gallium arsenide circuit layer on top of the disposable layer.

Next, using a laser, they vaporized the disposable layer and lifted off the circuitry layer like flapjack on a greased griddle.

They mounted this thin circuitry layer on a more solid backing and cleaned the costly gallium arsenide wafer to make the next batch of circuits.

Nainani estimates that this reuse could create gallium arsenide devices that would be 50 to 100 times more expensive than silicon circuits – still a big differential but much less than what exists today.

Clemens thinks the Stanford process could rekindle interest in gallium arsenide electronics.

Silicon is inexpensive today because, over time, the electronics industry has focused all of its ingenuity on making silicon cheaper. Silicon wafers are $5 today because manufacturers compete to satisfy the world's ever-increasing appetite for wafers and, over the course of decades, that competition has driven prices down.

It all boils down to economies of scale, Clemens said.

"Once it becomes possible to make gallium arsenide more cost-effectively, other people will jump in to improve other parts of the process,'' Clemens said. "And with each advance, more uses will open up, especially in solar energy generation where has clear efficiency advantages."


Explore further

Solar cell compound probed under pressure

More information: "Laser liftoff of gallium arsenide thin films." MRS Communications, DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1557/mrc.2015.2
Citation: New process could make gallium arsenide cheaper for computer chips, solar cells (2015, March 25) retrieved 22 August 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2015-03-gallium-arsenide-cheaper-chips-solar.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
47 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Mar 25, 2015
Since in this new process the working gallium arsenide circuits are grown on top of a layer of "disposable material", why does the substrate have to be a hugely expensive gallium arsenide wafer?

Mar 25, 2015
So, what is the "disposable material" that evidently isn't expensive gallium arsenide but has a matching lattice constant?

And then the question becomes: if there is a "disposable material" with the same lattice constant as GaAs. isn't there a "less disposable" material with the same lattice constant which could be used as the substrate?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more