Why the urge to find 'Nemo' has helped fish diversify

June 12, 2014
Wideband anemonefish from the Solitary Islands, Australia, tending eggs. Credit: Ian Shaw.

Caring parents foster successful offspring, or so the thinking goes. But for reef fishes, such as Disney's charismatic clownfish, Nemo, the effects of parental care stretch right across evolutionary time and even increase species diversity. This is according to new research involving Trinity College Dublin's Professor of Zoology (School of Natural Sciences), Yvonne Buckley.

Typically, reef fishes adopt one of two parental strategies: they are either like the egg-guarding clownfish, caring for their young, or they trust to luck and release their eggs straight into the water column following fertilisation. Although had long suspected that hatching from guarded eggs settle closer to home than those hatching from floating eggs, whether or not these distances mattered in the long run had been unknown until now.

The new research shows that there is a profound evolutionary difference between these two groups of fishes: Those that guard their eggs are more likely to yield new species. This is probably because the relative lack of genetic mixing means those populations of individuals separated by distance or by some ecological barrier adapt to different environments and diversify into unique species, given sufficient time. Species that disperse more widely tend to mix more frequently, which makes it harder for different populations to follow different evolutionary paths.

Professor Buckley is a co-author of the research that has just been published in the international journal American Naturalist. She said: "There are over 7000 species of that we know about, which means they comprise approximately 10% of all living vertebrates. It is amazing that just one factor – whether or not parents guard their young – is so important in terms of explaining patterns that span over 100 million years."

While caring for your young leads to higher diversity, the story is not all good news for Nemo and co. Individual species are typically more vulnerable to extinction if they do not disperse widely, because local threats and disasters such as oil spills or coral reef declines can wipe out populations that do not share their genes too widely.

Professor Buckley added: "The amazing diversity of fish that live on reefs are threatened by overexploitation, climate change and pollution all over the world. Not only are we losing beautiful , but we may also be changing the course of evolutionary processes that lead to diversity in the first place."

Explore further: 100 million year study shows a sheltered start breeds evolutionary success

More information: Dispersal Capacity Predicts Both Population Genetic Structure and Species Richness in Reef Fishes, Cynthia Riginos, Yvonne M. Buckley, Simon P. Blomberg and Eric A. Treml, The American Naturalist Ahead of Print, p. 000. Published by: The University of Chicago Press, Article Stable URL: www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/676505

Related Stories

Reef fish arrived in two waves

April 10, 2014

(Phys.org) —The world's reefs are hotbeds of biological diversity, including over 4,500 species of fish. A new study shows that the ancestors of these fish colonized reefs in two distinct waves, before and after the mass ...

Recommended for you

Gene editing in the brain gets a major upgrade

October 19, 2017

Genome editing technologies have revolutionized biomedical science, providing a fast and easy way to modify genes. However, the technique allowing scientists to carryout the most precise edits, doesn't work in cells that ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.