EU nuclear safety sweep accused of soft-pedalling

May 9, 2011 by Christian Spillmann
Shown here are nuclear reactors at a US power plant. Europe on Wednesday will draw up stress-test parameters for a safety sweep of its nuclear power reactors like these, promised after Japan's Fukushima No.1 disaster, but already the focus of bitter disputes.

Europe on Wednesday will draw up stress-test parameters for a safety sweep of its nuclear power reactors, promised after Japan's Fukushima No.1 disaster, but already the focus of bitter disputes.

For experts stand accused of turning a blind eye to the risk of terror attacks or aircraft accidents -- and of being in thrall to the powerful industry lobby governing their career prospects.

The European Nuclear Safety Regulators Group (ENSREG) has been entrusted with the job of checking whether ageing power plants can withstand the sort of natural disaster that triggered the meltdown in Japan.

It was the EU's 27 heads of state and government who opted to hand the design of the tests to their domestic regulators. ENSREG will meet in Brussels on Wednesday to agree on the criteria.

But the meeting comes as anti-nuclear politicians and campaigners object that the industry lobby, backed by the biggest players in France and Britain, have secured an easy ride.

The EU's energy commissioner Gunther Oettinger has also made it clear he will not settle for a watered-down set of tests.

"I will not put my signature to a which does not live up to my expectations nor to those of the broader public," Oettinger, of Germany, warned in an interview with the German weekly Spiegel.

"I do not agree with the fact that man-made disasters should be tested on a voluntary basis only," he added.

But Oettinger insists he is prepared to lodge new legislative proposals this year in a bid to force a tougher safety regime.

The commissioner drew the ire of the industry after the March quake and tsunami in Japan when he claimed the world was staring at a "apocalypse."

On Tuesday, he plans to meet with pressure groups and figures seeking backing for that position.

If Oettinger spoke out it was partly because lobby group the Western European Nuclear Regulators Association (WENRA) wants to exclude plane crashes and deliberate attacks from the test criteria.

Opponents fear they will manage to push through testing criteria that while raising test limits for plants' resistance to earthquakes, floods or severe systems failures breakdowns, exclude these kinds of man-made catastrophes.

WENRA members Italy and Sweden, which have abandoned nuclear energy, and Germany, which is going to, are among those backing their western partners on the issue.

But France and Britain, which between them account for more than half the 143 nuclear power plants in service in the European Union, are thought to be leading the charge.

Paris and London "are refusing the idea of including a deliberate plane crash, because no European plant would be able to stand up to that and therefore they would all have to close," said European Greens energy expert Michel Raquet.

The French authorities have dismissed the criticism: one of their officials in Brussels insisted that every eventuality would be covered in the stress tests, including the failure of the cooling system which proved so catastrophic at Fukushima.

Other EU countries however, share the fears of anti-nuclear campaigners.

In anti-nuclear Austria, Environment minister Nikolaus Berlakovich has openly criticised European plants' exposure to cyber-attacks.

And Belgium's energy minister Paul Magnette sparked weekend headlines when he argued in a debate with trade unionists that plants there could be mothballed ahead of schedule.

Lithuania, meanwhile, is anxiously looking over its shoulder at non-EU neighbour Belarus as the latter builds a new plant. The Baltic state wants its EU partners to develop national evacuation strategies in the event of a worst-case scenario, Brussels officials say.

"Based on the current plans for these tests, the European Union is falling well short of the necessary rigour," Greens EU lawmaker Yannick Jadot warned.

"If this is a success for the authorities in London and France, who have pulled this off through intensive lobbying to strip down the tests' specifications, it's a failure for all our citizens," he warned.

Explore further: EU to mull 'stress tests' for nuclear plants

Related Stories

EU to mull 'stress tests' for nuclear plants

March 15, 2011

The European Union will discuss Tuesday whether to conduct "stress tests" on atomic power plants to check their safety in light of Japan's nuclear crisis, a European Commission spokeswoman said.

EU fixes post-Japan nuclear safety overhaul

March 25, 2011

European leaders resolved Friday to revisit safety at nuclear reactors as emergency workers in Japan suffered radiation burns and rising global fears of food contamination hit home.

EU bids to lock down radioactive waste forever

November 3, 2010

Europe sought Wednesday to lock away forever lethal radioactive waste, but a European Commission warning of hopelessly inadequate disposal facilities itself drew a stinging rebuke.

New U.S. nuclear reactors unlikely soon: physicist

April 15, 2011

( -- Japanese officials increased the nuclear crisis level at the Fukushima plant on Monday to match that of the 1986 Chernobyl disaster. But, unlike the Soviet disaster, most of the radiation from the Fukushima ...

IAEA warned Japan over nuclear quake risk: WikiLeaks

March 17, 2011

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) warned Japan two years ago that a strong earthquake could pose a "serious problem" for its nuclear power stations, Britain's Daily Telegraph reported.

Recommended for you

When words, structured data are placed on single canvas

October 22, 2017

If "ugh" is your favorite word to describe entering, amending and correcting data on the rows and columns on spreadsheets you are not alone. Coda, a new name in the document business, feels it's time for a change. This is ...

Enhancing solar power with diatoms

October 20, 2017

Diatoms, a kind of algae that reproduces prodigiously, have been called "the jewels of the sea" for their ability to manipulate light. Now, researchers hope to harness that property to boost solar technology.

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet May 10, 2011
Nuclear safety is paramount in the public's mind and offering a reactor many times safer than widely used LWRs would secure the future of the nuclear industry and pave the way for a safe, green future for coming generations.

Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors (LFTRs) operate at atmospheric pressure, using stable fluoride salts of low reactivity. So there is no pressure or high chemical-reactivity 'driver' to expel radioactive substances into the environment. The fissioning fuel is in liquid form and is 'used up' 100%, so there is no need for cooling pools and subsequent fuel reprocessing. The amount of waste produced is less than one-thirtieth of that from an LWR and decays to background radiation levels in 300 years (easily, cheaply and safely storable).

LFTRs can 'burn-up' existing nuclear waste, as start-up fuel and therefore will get rid of the need for storage of such waste for hundreds of thousands of years.

Sell the safety improvements that can secure our green future.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.