EU bids to lock down radioactive waste forever

November 3, 2010 by Roddy Thomson
Interior view shows the storage room for highly radioactive waste in the interim storage site at the northern German city of Gorleben. Europe sought Wednesday to lock away forever lethal radioactive waste, but a European Commission warning of hopelessly inadequate disposal facilities itself drew a stinging rebuke.

Europe sought Wednesday to lock away forever lethal radioactive waste, but a European Commission warning of hopelessly inadequate disposal facilities itself drew a stinging rebuke.

Half a century after atomic power was first produced in Britain, Europe's nuclear energy-producing countries stand accused of future negligence without a single "deep geological disposal" site equipped to withstand up to a million years of decay.

As a result, the European Union's executive arm has tabled legislative proposals that would see states pushed to build the kind of facility deep in the earth's crust that it says scientists claim is the only way to protect nature's balance.

"We have to make sure that we have the highest safety standards in the world to protect our citizens, our water and the ground against nuclear contamination," said EU energy commissioner Guenther Oettinger.

"Safety is indivisible. If an accident happens in one country, it can have devastating effects also in others."

However, while environmental campaigners welcomed any move towards "increased transparency" under the planned changes, one attacked the commission's proposals as "sub-standard."

"It would take an engineering genius to safely bury white-hot, highly-dangerous nuclear waste deep underground for longer than mankind has been on the planet," said Greenpeace EU dirty energy campaigner Jan Haverkamp in a report.

"We fear a disposal facility could rupture high-level nuclear waste into the water table for hundreds of thousands of years."

Within four years of Europe adopting the proposed legislation, the commission said states would have to nail down a "concrete timetable" for constructing their facilities, including "the financing schemes chosen."

The commission wants operators "to put money aside for the financing of future disposals."

Producers would not be allowed to export nuclear waste to countries outside the EU for final disposal.

Current schemes offering so-called "interim storage" are given a lifespan of "maximal 50-100 years," the commission said, meaning waste "has to be retrieved and repackaged."

Spent fuel and "need continuous maintenance and oversight," it said.

As the material is typically near the surface, "there is in addition a risk of accidents, including airplane crashes, fires or earthquakes."

Finland plans to have the sort of repository the commission says the science recommends operational in 2020, Sweden in 2023 and France in 2025, Oettinger's office said.

The EU has 143 nuclear power plants in use across 14 of its 27 states, with another two, Italy and Poland, planning to build their first.

Countries would be able to choose to work together to build and manage final disposal sites in any one of them, should they secure cross-border public support.

Most European nations have settled on maintaining nuclear energy at the core of their power needs for coming generations, as oil threatens to run dry and new green technologies have yet to deliver their full potential.

The first nuclear plant to enter service in the EU was Calder Hall, which came on line in northwest England in 1956.

Explore further: Experts call for local and regional control of sites for radioactive waste

Related Stories

Researcher urges nuclear waste options

August 18, 2006

The Bush administration is eagerly pushing nuclear power as a way to help solve the U.S. energy crisis. But in its new plan for nuclear waste management, the administration is taking the wrong approach, says an MIT professor ...

Feds unveil Yucca Mountain cleanup plans

October 27, 2005

U.S. Energy Department officials have announced plans to make Yucca Mountain a "clean" nuclear waste dump, but Nevada officials aren't happy.

EU energy policy encounters difficulties

February 8, 2006

The European Union's efforts to boost European energy security are reportedly conflicting with some EU member states' national security interests.

DIAMOND to tackle UK nuclear waste issues

May 1, 2008

The long-term problem of how to manage and dispose of Britain’s nuclear waste is to be tackled by a UK consortium headed by the University of Leeds.

GE and Hitachi want to use nuclear waste as a fuel

February 18, 2010

( -- One of the world's biggest providers of nuclear reactors, GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy (a joint venture of General Electric and Hitachi), wants to reprocess nuclear waste for use as a fuel in advanced nuclear ...

Recommended for you

Weather anomalies accelerate the melting of sea ice

January 16, 2018

In the winter of 2015/16, something happened that had never before been seen on this scale: at the end of December, temperatures rose above zero degrees Celsius for several days in parts of the Arctic. Temperatures of up ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Nov 04, 2010
It will be possible to use Molten Salt Reactors like the Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor to "burn-up" most of this waste. "Using LFTR to Minimize Actinide Wastes" by Lars Jorgensen 30 March 2010 is an excellent paper on the subject. There are much better solutions to our problems than just locking it up.
1 / 5 (1) Nov 05, 2010
In this light you may wish to consider looking over the presentations collected on this website:


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.