NREL Uncovers Clean Energy Leaders State by State

November 24, 2009 by Joe Verrengia
States that have a renewable energy portfolio standard appear to be generating more clean wind energy the longer the RPS has been in effect. Credit: NREL

( -- That California and Texas still lead the United States in generating renewable energy probably is no surprise. But, NREL's 2009 State of the States report shows that several smaller states from Maine to Louisiana to Utah are closing the clean energy gap, confirming that every state has renewable energy potential.

An exclusive state-by-state analysis by the U.S Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory shows that clean energy development is spreading rapidly throughout the country, often in conjunction with public policies designed to spur such growth.

By 2007, 24 of the nation's 50 states were generating at least 1 of renewable electricity from non-hydro sources, according to the 2009 NREL State of the States report (PDF 4.2 MB).

While states such as California and Texas with abundant resources continue to rank among the leading states in terms of total renewable electricity generation, the study shows that a range of other states are demonstrating strong growth in the clean energy sector, including those with historic fossil fuel legacies, such as Oklahoma and Illinois.

Wind energy accounted for the largest percentage of nationwide growth in renewable generation between 2001 and 2007, including a 30 percent increase in 2006 and 2007.

Biomass generation continued to expand across most regions, with states as disparate as Delaware, Utah, Minnesota and Alaska showing the most recent growth in the sector. Biomass generation continued to be strong in southeastern states, including Georgia, Alabama and Florida.

The State of the States project was developed by the U.S. Department of Energy, NREL and the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE). It is funded by the Department of Energy's office of and Renewable Energy (EERE).

Not a Scorecard

This is the second annual State of the States report. NREL energy analysts began compiling new data and making initial comparisons last February.

The 212-page report contains 101 charts dissecting major renewable energy technologies and policies, as well as an extensive appendix listing clean energy resources. While the report provides state-by-state comparisons, NREL authors said the report is not meant to be a renewable energy scorecard.

Its broader purpose is to document the interplay between renewable energy technology development, policy implementation and markets on the state level — and, as a result, to help make renewable energy development more effective.

"This is the only report that looks at data from every state and attempts to quantify the links between renewable energy development and policy implementation," said NREL Senior Energy Analyst Joyce McLaren, who led the report team.

"Of course, it's interesting to know where and how much wind energy is being produced, but knowing that alone isn't going to help move you forward," McLaren said. "This report tries to identify how states are moving forward and which mechanisms are the most effective and efficient."

Making the Policy-Energy Connection

All but 14 U.S. states now have adopted renewable energy portfolio standards or goals. And, all but seven states have net-metering policies in place, which allow customers who generate their own electricity to send surplus power back to the grid and have it subtracted from their retail electricity use.

State policymakers who commented on the project in its draft stages said they were impressed by breadth and scope of the final report. Knowing what is taking place beyond your own state's borders can be influential, they said, even when one state's renewable energy resources are different from another's.

"In recent years, our energy committee has been dealing with questions that are hyper-local, such as whether we should consider including wood from construction and demolition as a renewable resource for purposes of our renewable portfolio standard," said Kevin McCarthy, principal analyst for the Connecticut General Assembly's Office of Legislative Research.

"This report puts much more information at our fingertips and allows us to take a much broader view," he said.

The NREL report also provides observations about the effects of state-based renewable energy policies,

McLaren said certain policies appear to be working particularly well in combination. For example, more renewable energy has been developed in states that require utilities both to disclose their fuel mix and offer customers the option to purchase electricity produced with renewable fuels.

States that have a renewable portfolio standard appear to be generating more clean wind energy the longer the RPS has been in effect.

States that implemented net-metering legislation in 2005 had significantly more renewable energy generation by 2007 than states without such a policy. The analysts looked back in time in order to identify development trends and make the link between past policy implementation and current development. However, McLaren cautioned that the reliability of the conclusions will be strengthened if future analyses identify the same trends.

"It's when we see the same thing every year for three or four years that we can be confident in the result," she said. "As the renewable energy field continues to develop, connections between policy and the ensuing development will only become more evident."

The report also contains an extensive list of resources with online links to renewable energy information, maps, research centers, industry associations and related information from NREL and other institutions.

Key Findings

• Non-hydro renewable electricity generation as a percent of total electricity generation increased 33.7 percent between 2001 and 2007, reaching a national total of 105 million megawatt-hours.

• California led the nation in terms of total non-hydroelectric renewable generation in 2007; Maine is No. 1 when also considering state population and gross state product.

• Washington led in total renewable generation in 2007 if hydroelectric resources are included.

• South Dakota ranks first in overall growth in non-hydro generation between 2001 and 2007.

• Geothermal electricity generation in the Lower 48 is concentrated in California, Nevada and Utah.

• Solar capacity is concentrated in the southwestern and northeastern states.

• Leading wind energy states are Texas, California, Iowa, Minnesota, and Washington. However, sparsely populated Wyoming leads in per-capita wind generation.

Provided by NREL

Explore further: Berkeley Lab examines state-level renewables portfolio standards policies

Related Stories

NREL, Xcel energy sign wind to hydrogen research agreement

May 8, 2006

The U.S. Department of Energy's, National Renewable Energy Laboratory and Xcel Energy recently signed a cooperative agreement for an innovative "wind to hydrogen" research, development and demonstration project. Researchers ...

NREL Updates National Solar Radiation Database

May 25, 2007

The Department of Energy’s (DOE) National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and collaborators have updated the National Solar Radiation Database, a planning tool that provides critical information about the amount of solar ...

China joins U.S. FutureGen project

December 16, 2006

China has joined the United States in the FutureGen International Partnership, a plan to develop clean-burning coal, the U.S. Department of Energy said Friday.

Schwarzenegger to issue renewable energy order

September 14, 2009

(AP) -- Administration officials say Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is moving ahead with plans to sign an executive order establishing the most aggressive renewable energy standard in the nation.

Recommended for you

Volvo to supply Uber with self-driving cars (Update)

November 20, 2017

Swedish carmaker Volvo Cars said Monday it has signed an agreement to supply "tens of thousands" of self-driving cars to Uber, as the ride-sharing company battles a number of different controversies.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (2) Nov 24, 2009
Who can waste the most money? Let's have a contest, and some fools will celebrate it.
1 / 5 (1) Nov 25, 2009
We have spent over $2.2 billion dollars on algae research for the last 35 years and nothing to show for it. Algae has been researched to death at universities for the last 50 years in the US. The problem is as long as the algae researchers can say we are 3-5 years away, its too expensive and they need more research they get the grant money. Nothing will ever get commercialized at the university level.

The real question you need to be asking is " Does the US really want to get off of foreign oil or do we want to continue to fund the algae researchers at the universities."

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.