Measurement at Big Bang conditions confirms lithium problem

Aug 27, 2014
Michael Anders at the LUNA accelerator in Italy. Credit: HZDR/M. Anders

The field of astrophysics has a stubborn problem and it's called lithium. The quantities of lithium predicted to have resulted from the Big Bang are not actually present in stars. But the calculations are correct – a fact which has now been confirmed for the first time in experiments conducted at the underground laboratory in the Gran Sasso mountain in Italy. As part of an international team, researchers from the Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR) studied how much lithium forms under Big Bang conditions. The results were published in Physical Review Letters.

Lithium, aside from hydrogen and helium, is one of the three elements that are created before the first stars form. These three elements were – according to the theory – already created early on, through what is known as "primordial nucleosynthesis." That means that when the universe was only a few minutes old, neutrons and protons merged to form the nuclei of the these elements. At the Laboratory for Underground Nuclear Astrophysics (LUNA), the nucleosynthesis of has now been reproduced by an international team of scientists. Michael Anders, who earned his doctorate in the last year at TU Dresden and HZDR on this very topic, took a leading role on the team. Within the framework of a project that was funded by the German Research Foundation, he was supervised by Dr. Daniel Bemmerer, group leader at HZDR.

In the Italian , the scientists fired helium nuclei at heavy hydrogen (known as deuterium) in order to reach energies similar to those just after the Big Bang. The idea was to measure how much lithium forms under similar conditions to those during the early stages of the universe. The result of the experiment: the data confirmed the theoretical predictions, which are incompatible with the observed lithium concentrations found in the universe.

"For the first time, we could actually study the lithium-6 production in one part of the Big Bang energy range with our experiment," explains Daniel Bemmerer. Lithium-6 (three neutrons, three protons) is one of the element's two stable isotopes. The formation of lithium-7, which possesses an additional neutron, was studied in 2006 by Bemmerer at LUNA.

With these new results, what is known as the "lithium problem" remains a hard nut to crack: on the one hand, now all laboratory results of the astrophysicists suggest that the theory of primordial nucleosynthesis is correct. On the other hand, many observations of astronomers show that the oldest stars in our Milky Way contain only half as much lithium-7 as predicted. Sensational reports by Swedish researchers, who discovered clearly more lithium-6 in such stars than predicted, must also likely be checked again based on the new LUNA data. Bemmerer says, "Should unusual lithium concentrations be observed in the future, we know, thanks to the new measurements, that it cannot be due to the primordial nucleosynthesis."

Further research will soon be carried out in a new underground lab

What was important for the studies was the special location of LUNA: in the mountainous Gran Sasso d'Italia, 1400 meters of solid rock keep the disturbance from cosmic radiation at bay. The experimental setup is additionally enveloped in a lead shell. Only with such good shielding can the rare interactions between the nuclei be precisely determined. But within the next year, similar research will also be possible in Dresden. TU Dresden and HZDR will put the accelerator laboratory "Felsenkeller" into operation. Although the solid rock shielding from natural radiation in this former brewery cellar is only forty-five meters, it is already sufficient for many measurements. The new laboratory also possesses a particle accelerator that is more than twelve times as strong: "There we can expand our experiments and study the formation of elements at high energy ranges", says Bemmerer.

Explore further: Lithium-based neutron detector named among Top 100 technologies of the year

More information: M. Anders et al. (2014), First Direct Measurement of the 2H(α,γ)6Li Cross Section at Big Bang Energies and the Primordial Lithium Problem. Physical Review Letters 113, 042501; DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.042501

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

International team strengthens Big Bang Theory

Jun 06, 2013

(Phys.org) —An international team of scientists using the most powerful telescope on Earth has discovered the moments just after the Big Bang happened more like the theory predicts, eliminating a significant ...

By measuring lithium, researchers study star structure

Oct 25, 2012

During its nuclear fusion processes, a burning star does not make the element lithium. Rather, over time, stars consume their lithium supply that was originally created during the Big Bang that gave birth to our universe.

Recommended for you

User comments : 13

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

vlaaing peerd
2.1 / 5 (8) Aug 27, 2014
Lithium isn't missing, it's just dark lithium.
orti
1 / 5 (1) Aug 27, 2014
"Should unusual lithium concentrations be observed in the future, we know, thanks to the new measurements, that it cannot be due to the primordial nucleosynthesis."
? The whole point of the article is there isn't enough lithium to fit theory.
richardwenzel987
5 / 5 (3) Aug 27, 2014
We think, in these experiments that we are modeling big bang conditions, but maybe we are not. It might be the case that conditions in the primordial universe deviated in some way from our expectations. Is this pointing to some new physics?
jalmy
1.4 / 5 (11) Aug 27, 2014
Ya this is pretty much bunk science here. So you think you might be modeling conditions that might be right and it matches the theory that you used to set up your conditions? It's nothing more than pig Latin there. The fact is your model is wrong, and it's wrong because of natural selection of some sort. For some reason the matter chose to "condense" into other things than lithium. It's one thing to make something form under certain controlled conditions without the presence of the formation of other elements at the same time. Natural selection. Some of the other things going on pushed or pulled or combined and ruined your lithium forming conditions.
Aligo
Aug 27, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
mikep608
1 / 5 (12) Aug 27, 2014
HERE'S MY WEBPAGE LINK. I LIKE TO REINTERPRET EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS SO WE CAN HAVE MORE USEFUL KNOWLEDGE TO GUIDE US IN PROGRESS.https://www.faceb...eline
11791
Aug 28, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
arom
1 / 5 (6) Aug 28, 2014
The field of astrophysics has a stubborn problem and it's called lithium. The quantities of lithium predicted to have resulted from the Big Bang are not actually present in stars. But the calculations are correct – a fact which has now been confirmed for the first time in experiments conducted at the underground laboratory ….

With these new results, what is known as the "lithium problem" remains a hard nut to crack ….


By the way there is a much more crucial problem in the conventional Big Bang theory which is rarely mentioned nowadays, i.e. before the Big Bang occur there is infinite dense singularity (of matter) which is – 'the ultimate free lunch for creation of the universe' said by Stephen W. Hawking in his popular book – The history of time ….
http://www.vacuum...=7〈=en

agsb2
1 / 5 (2) Aug 28, 2014
The Lithium problem will make sense when Di-Lithium is discovered.
swordsman
2 / 5 (4) Aug 28, 2014
Only a 50% error! Not bad by Astrophysics standards.
ab3a
1 / 5 (2) Aug 30, 2014
This model is so bad, it's not even wrong.
Shitead
not rated yet Aug 31, 2014
Lithium is an excellent low-temperature fusion fuel. Stars consume lithium as fast as they produce it. The real mystery is why does lithium exist at all?
nswanberg
1 / 5 (1) Sep 01, 2014
All models are wrong. Some are useful.
Bob Osaka
not rated yet Sep 01, 2014
Finding one lithium atom shrouded by ten billion hydrogen atoms is an unenviable task. It's like searching for a missing airliner in a vast ocean. It's there, somewhere, out there...

What? No jokes about the LUNA dicks must have a bipolar disorder because they're missing their lithium?
Grallen
1 / 5 (2) Sep 02, 2014
This is great! This experiment will draw attention of theorists to the gap in our knowledge: I can't wait for the shiny new (mathematically supported) theories!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.